• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绝经后妇女基于 HPV 的宫颈癌筛查中专业采样与自我采样的比较。

Comparison between professional sampling and self-sampling for HPV-based cervical cancer screening among postmenopausal women.

机构信息

Department of Women's Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Sep;142(3):359-364. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12538. Epub 2018 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1002/ijgo.12538
PMID:29856071
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether self-sampling is as reliable as professional sampling for HPV testing and genotype detection among postmenopausal women.

METHODS

In the present prospective cross-sectional study, women in Örebro County, Sweden, who had high-risk HPV (hrHPV) and normal cytology results in exit screening tests conducted in between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2014, were invited to follow-up screenings between February 24, 2015 and May 15, 2015, that included professional sampling and self-sampling. HPV genotypes were identified by a DNA-based assay that could detect 35 HPV genotypes. Findings between the different sampling methods were compared.

RESULTS

Of 143 women who participated, 119 returned a self-sample. Completely concordant results were observed in 67 of these samples when both hrHPV and low-risk HPV genotypes were analyzed. Overall, 99 (83.2%) women had the same clinically relevant finding from both sampling methods. Twenty women had discordant hrHPV results (hrHPV detected in 10 self-samples vs 10 professionally collected samples; Cohen κ 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.53-0.80). There was no significant difference between the two sampling methods for clinically significant infections (P>0.99) or extended genotyping (P=0.827).

CONCLUSION

Postmenopausal women could be offered self-sampling devices to increase screening-program coverage while maintaining test quality.

摘要

目的

研究绝经后妇女自我采样与专业采样在 HPV 检测和基因分型检测中的可靠性。

方法

在本前瞻性横断面研究中,邀请瑞典厄勒布鲁县于 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日期间接受出口筛查试验且高危型 HPV(hrHPV)和细胞学正常的女性参加 2015 年 2 月 24 日至 5 月 15 日之间的随访筛查,包括专业采样和自我采样。通过可检测 35 种 HPV 基因型的基于 DNA 的检测方法确定 HPV 基因型。比较不同采样方法的结果。

结果

143 名参与研究的女性中,有 119 名女性提交了自我采样。当同时分析 hrHPV 和低危型 HPV 基因型时,这些样本中有 67 个完全一致。总体而言,99(83.2%)名女性的两种采样方法具有相同的临床相关发现。20 名女性的 hrHPV 结果不一致(10 个自我样本和 10 个专业采集样本均检测到 hrHPV;Cohen κ 0.66,95%置信区间 0.53-0.80)。两种采样方法在临床显著感染(P>0.99)或扩展基因分型(P=0.827)方面无显著差异。

结论

可以为绝经后妇女提供自我采样设备,在保持检测质量的同时提高筛查计划的覆盖率。

相似文献

1
Comparison between professional sampling and self-sampling for HPV-based cervical cancer screening among postmenopausal women.绝经后妇女基于 HPV 的宫颈癌筛查中专业采样与自我采样的比较。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Sep;142(3):359-364. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12538. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
2
[Utilization of self-sampling kits for HPV testing in cervical cancer screening - pilot study].[宫颈癌筛查中使用人乳头瘤病毒检测自采样试剂盒的初步研究]
Ceska Gynekol. 2015 Dec;80(6):436-43.
3
High-risk human papillomavirus detection in self-sampling compared to physician-taken smear in a responder population of the Dutch cervical screening: Results of the VERA study.高危型人乳头瘤病毒自我采样检测与荷兰宫颈筛查应答人群中医生取样涂片检测的比较:VERA 研究结果。
Prev Med. 2017 Aug;101:96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.05.021. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
4
Human Papillomavirus Genotype Detection and Cytology Using a New Self-Sampling Method.人乳头瘤病毒基因型检测和细胞学检查采用新的自我采样方法。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 May 1;25(5):1673-1679. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.5.1673.
5
Self-collected vaginal sampling for the detection of genital human papillomavirus (HPV) using careHPV among Ghanaian women.加纳女性使用careHPV进行自我采集阴道样本以检测生殖道人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)
BMC Womens Health. 2017 Sep 26;17(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12905-017-0448-1.
6
A randomized, controlled trial of two strategies of offering the home-based HPV self-sampling test to non- participants in the Flemish cervical cancer screening program.一项关于向弗拉芒宫颈癌筛查计划中未参与者提供基于家庭的 HPV 自我采样检测的两种策略的随机对照试验。
Int J Cancer. 2018 Aug 15;143(4):861-868. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31391. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
7
Acceptability of self-collected versus provider-collected sampling for HPV DNA testing among women in rural El Salvador.萨尔瓦多农村地区女性中,人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)DNA检测采用自我采集样本与医护人员采集样本的可接受性。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Aug;126(2):156-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.02.026. Epub 2014 May 2.
8
Randomized Intervention of Self-Collected Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing in Under-Screened Rural Women: Uptake of Screening and Acceptability.农村筛查不足女性人乳头瘤病毒检测自我采样的随机干预:筛查接受情况与可接受性
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016 May;25(5):489-97. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5348. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
9
Daily self-sampling for high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) testing.高危型人乳头瘤病毒(HR-HPV)检测的每日自我采样
J Clin Virol. 2015 Dec;73:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2015.09.016. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
10
Accuracy of dry vaginal self-sampling for detecting high-risk human papillomavirus infection in cervical cancer screening: a cross-sectional study.宫颈癌筛查中用于检测高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染的阴道干自我采样准确性:一项横断面研究
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Aug;134(2):302-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.05.026. Epub 2014 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Modelling the cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with HPV self-sampling and molecular triage for women aged 60-69 years.对60至69岁女性采用人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)自我采样和分子分流进行宫颈癌筛查的成本效益建模。
Discov Oncol. 2025 May 18;16(1):805. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02432-3.
2
Self-collected versus medic-collected sampling for human papillomavirus testing among women in Lagos, Nigeria: a comparative study.尼日利亚拉各斯的女性中,自我采集样本与医护采集样本进行人乳头瘤病毒检测的比较研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 15;22(1):1922. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14222-5.
3
Predictors of treatment failure for adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: Up to 14 years of recorded follow-up.
子宫颈腺癌治疗失败的预测因素:长达14年的随访记录
Oncol Lett. 2022 Aug 25;24(4):357. doi: 10.3892/ol.2022.13477. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
Comparison of self-collected versus clinician collected cervicovaginal specimens for detection of high risk human papillomavirus among HIV infected women in Ethiopia.比较埃塞俄比亚 HIV 感染女性中自我采集和临床医生采集的宫颈阴道标本,以检测高危型人乳头瘤病毒。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 Sep 1;22(1):360. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01944-2.
5
Age, margin status, high-risk human papillomavirus and cytology independently predict recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia up to 6 years after treatment.年龄、切缘状态、高危型人乳头瘤病毒和细胞学检查可独立预测治疗后长达6年的复发性高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变。
Oncol Lett. 2021 Sep;22(3):684. doi: 10.3892/ol.2021.12945. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
6
Self-sampling for high-risk human papillomavirus as a follow-up alternative after treatment of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.高危型人乳头瘤病毒自我采样作为高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变治疗后的随访替代方法。
Oncol Lett. 2021 Apr;21(4):240. doi: 10.3892/ol.2021.12501. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
7
Cervical dysplasia in elderly women performing repeated self-sampling for HPV testing.老年女性重复进行 HPV 自我采样时的宫颈发育不良。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 5;13(12):e0207714. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207714. eCollection 2018.