Hur Yera, Cho A Ra, Kim Sun
Institute of Medical Education, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.
Department of Medical Education, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Med Educ. 2018 Jun;30(2):119-130. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2018.87. Epub 2018 May 30.
The purpose of this study was to explore the possibility of mentoring as an alternative to the current student support system based on our experiences of developing, operating, and evaluating a mentoring program.
In 2014 and 2015, a total of 29 mentoring pairs were selected to be trained as mentors and mentees. The mentoring program was evaluated by the following methods. First, at the end of the one-on-one mentoring program, the mentee made a presentation summarizing their experiences and submitted a portfolio. Second, suggestions from the mentors and mentees were gathered from a survey and from a focus group interview. The quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, frequency, and the Mann-Whitney U-test using SPSS version 21.0.
One-on-one mentoring sessions were carried out an average of five times during the semester. The topics of discussion were very diverse, including career coaching, personal counselling, journal club, field trips, leisure activities, and volunteering. Mentors and mentees showed high satisfaction rates regarding the content and administration of the program (mentors: 4.15±0.59, mentees: 4.00±1.58). However, the duration of the mentoring program was given a comparatively low rating (mentors: 3.15±1.09, mentees: 3.24±1.03).
Overall, the implementation of the mentoring program was successful. Based on the content of the main activities, we can confirm the possibility of implementing an individualized support program for solving the mentoring issues faced by medical students.
基于我们在开发、运营和评估一个指导计划方面的经验,本研究旨在探索将指导作为当前学生支持系统的替代方案的可能性。
在2014年和2015年,共选出29对指导关系,分别作为导师和学员进行培训。通过以下方法对指导计划进行评估。首先,在一对一指导计划结束时,学员进行一次总结其经历的展示,并提交一份作品集。其次,通过一项调查和一次焦点小组访谈收集导师和学员的建议。使用SPSS 21.0版本对定量数据进行描述性统计、频率分析和曼-惠特尼U检验。
在学期期间,一对一指导课程平均进行了五次。讨论的主题非常多样,包括职业指导、个人咨询、期刊俱乐部、实地考察、休闲活动和志愿服务。导师和学员对该计划的内容和管理表现出较高的满意度(导师:4.15±0.59,学员:4.00±1.58)。然而,指导计划的时长得到了相对较低的评分(导师:3.15±1.09,学员:3.24±1.03)。
总体而言,指导计划实施成功。基于主要活动的内容,我们可以确认实施个性化支持计划以解决医学生面临的指导问题的可能性。