RPS ASA, South Kingstown, RI, USA.
RPS ASA, South Kingstown, RI, USA.
Mar Pollut Bull. 2018 Aug;133:1001-1015. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.05.042. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
Oil spill model simulations of a deepwater blowout in the Gulf of Mexico De Soto Canyon, assuming no intervention and various response options (i.e., subsea dispersant injection SSDI, in addition to mechanical recovery, in-situ burning, and surface dispersant application) were compared. Predicted oil fate, amount and area of surfaced oil, and exposure concentrations in the water column above potential effects thresholds were used as inputs to a Comparative Risk Assessment to identify response strategies that minimize long-term impacts. SSDI reduced human and wildlife exposure to volatile organic compounds; dispersed oil into a large water volume at depth; enhanced biodegradation; and reduced surface water, nearshore and shoreline exposure to floating oil and entrained/dissolved oil in the upper water column. Tradeoffs included increased oil exposures at depth. However, since organisms are less abundant below 200 m, results indicate that overall exposure of valued ecosystem components was minimized by use of SSDI.
对墨西哥湾德索托峡谷深水油井喷事件进行了溢油模型模拟,假设没有干预以及各种应对方案(即海底分散剂注入 SSDI,除了机械回收、就地燃烧和表面分散剂应用)。预测的石油命运、表面石油的数量和面积以及水柱中潜在影响阈值以上的暴露浓度被用作比较风险评估的输入,以确定能够将长期影响降至最低的应对策略。SSDI 减少了人类和野生动物接触挥发性有机化合物;将石油分散到深海大量水体中;增强了生物降解;减少了地表水、近岸和海岸线对浮油和上覆水柱中夹带/溶解油的暴露。权衡取舍包括在深处增加石油暴露。然而,由于在 200 米以下生物的数量较少,因此结果表明,使用 SSDI 可以最大程度地减少有价值生态系统成分的整体暴露。