Suppr超能文献

三种硅酸钙水门汀对犬牙髓切断术模型中炎症反应和矿化诱导潜能的影响

Effects of Three Calcium Silicate Cements on Inflammatory Response and Mineralization-Inducing Potentials in a Dog Pulpotomy Model.

作者信息

Kang Chung-Min, Hwang Jiwon, Song Je Seon, Lee Jae-Ho, Choi Hyung-Jun, Shin Yooseok

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, 03722, Korea.

Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2018 May 27;11(6):899. doi: 10.3390/ma11060899.

Abstract

This beagle pulpotomy study compared the inflammatory response and mineralization-inducing potential of three calcium silicate cements: ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) (Dentsply, Tulsa, OK, USA), OrthoMTA (BioMTA, Seoul, Korea), and Endocem MTA (Maruchi, Wonju, Korea). Exposed pulp tissues were capped with ProRoot MTA, OrthoMTA, or Endocem MTA. After 8 weeks, we extracted the teeth, then performed hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemical staining with osteocalcin and dentin sialoprotein. Histological evaluation comprised a scoring system with eight broad categories and analysis of calcific barrier areas. We evaluated 44 teeth capped with ProRoot MTA ( = 15), OrthoMTA ( = 18), or Endocem MTA ( = 11). Most ProRoot MTA specimens formed continuous calcific barriers; these pulps contained inflammation-free palisading patterns in the odontoblastic layer. Areas of the newly formed calcific barrier were greater with ProRoot MTA than with Endocem MTA ( = 0.006). Although dentin sialoprotein was highly expressed in all three groups, the osteocalcin expression was reduced in the OrthoMTA and Endocem MTA groups. ProRoot MTA was superior to OrthoMTA and Endocem MTA in all histological analyses. ProRoot MTA and OrthoMTA resulted in reduced pulpal inflammation and more complete calcific barrier formation, whereas Endocem MTA caused a lower level of calcific barrier continuity with tunnel defects.

摘要

本比格犬牙髓切断术研究比较了三种硅酸钙水门汀的炎症反应和矿化诱导潜力

ProRoot 三氧化矿物凝聚体(MTA)(美国登士柏国际公司,塔尔萨,俄克拉何马州)、OrthoMTA(韩国首尔 BioMTA 公司)和 Endocem MTA(韩国原州 Maruchi 公司)。将暴露的牙髓组织分别用 ProRoot MTA、OrthoMTA 或 Endocem MTA 覆盖。8 周后,拔除牙齿,然后进行苏木精-伊红染色以及用骨钙素和牙本质涎蛋白进行免疫组织化学染色。组织学评估包括一个有八个大类别的评分系统以及钙化屏障区域分析。我们评估了 44 颗分别用 ProRoot MTA(n = 15)、OrthoMTA(n = 18)或 Endocem MTA(n = 11)覆盖的牙齿。大多数 ProRoot MTA 标本形成了连续的钙化屏障;这些牙髓在成牙本质细胞层含有无炎症的栅栏状模式。ProRoot MTA 组新形成的钙化屏障面积大于 Endocem MTA 组(P = 0.006)。尽管牙本质涎蛋白在所有三组中均高表达,但 OrthoMTA 组和 Endocem MTA组的骨钙素表达降低。在所有组织学分析中,ProRoot MTA 均优于 OrthoMTA 和 Endocem MTA。ProRoot MTA 和 OrthoMTA 导致牙髓炎症减轻和钙化屏障形成更完整,而 Endocem MTA 导致钙化屏障连续性较低且有隧道状缺损。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9b5/6025164/bd222e140d09/materials-11-00899-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验