Suppr超能文献

458例卵巢肿瘤患者四种血清肿瘤标志物的临床分析:HE4、CA125、CA19-9和CEA联合检测在卵巢肿瘤中的诊断价值

Clinical analysis of four serum tumor markers in 458 patients with ovarian tumors: diagnostic value of the combined use of HE4, CA125, CA19-9, and CEA in ovarian tumors.

作者信息

Chen Fawen, Shen Jing, Wang Jianwei, Cai Pengwei, Huang Yi

机构信息

Department of Clinical Laboratory, Fujian Provincial Hospital South Branch.

Department of Blood Transfusion.

出版信息

Cancer Manag Res. 2018 May 22;10:1313-1318. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S155693. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the diagnostic values of human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for ovarian tumors.

METHODS

The participants were divided into three groups: 386 healthy women (control group), 262 patients with benign ovarian tumors (the benign group), and 196 patients with malignant pelvic tumors (the malignant group). The serum levels of HE4, CA125, CA19-9, and CEA were analyzed by electrochemiluminescent immunoassay.

RESULTS

It showed that serum levels of HE4, CA125, CA19-9, and CEA of patients with malignant ovarian tumors were significantly higher than those in the control group and benign group (<0.01). HE4 had a high specificity (96.56%) in malignant ovarian tumors. The tumor markers HE4, CA125, CA19-9, and CEA had a sensitivity of 63.78%, 62.75%, 35.71%, and 38.78%, respectively. The combined use of two or more tumor markers (parallel test) had a higher diagnostic sensitivity but lower specificity than a single tumor marker. The combined efficiency of HE4 and CA125 was the highest, with a sensitivity and specificity of 80.10% and 69.08%, respectively. HE4 and CA125 combined with the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm provided an efficient means of screening and diagnosis of ovarian malignancies. The diagnostic sensitivity increased to 88.52% when three or four tumor markers were used but showed no significant difference compared with the combination of HE4 and CA125 (>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The combination of three or four tumor markers did not improve the diagnostic efficacy when compared with the combination of HE4 and CA125.

摘要

目的

探讨人附睾蛋白4(HE4)、糖类抗原125(CA125)、糖类抗原19-9(CA19-9)和癌胚抗原(CEA)对卵巢肿瘤的诊断价值。

方法

将参与者分为三组:386名健康女性(对照组)、262例良性卵巢肿瘤患者(良性组)和196例恶性盆腔肿瘤患者(恶性组)。采用电化学发光免疫分析法检测血清中HE4、CA125、CA19-9和CEA的水平。

结果

结果显示,恶性卵巢肿瘤患者血清中HE4、CA125、CA19-9和CEA水平显著高于对照组和良性组(<0.01)。HE4在恶性卵巢肿瘤中具有较高的特异性(96.56%)。肿瘤标志物HE4、CA125、CA19-9和CEA的敏感性分别为63.78%、62.75%、35.71%和38.78%。两种或更多种肿瘤标志物联合使用(平行试验)比单一肿瘤标志物具有更高的诊断敏感性,但特异性较低。HE4和CA125联合使用的效率最高,敏感性和特异性分别为80.10%和69.08%。HE4和CA125与卵巢恶性肿瘤风险算法相结合提供了一种有效的卵巢恶性肿瘤筛查和诊断方法。使用三种或四种肿瘤标志物时诊断敏感性提高到88.52%,但与HE4和CA125联合使用相比无显著差异(>0.05)。

结论

与HE4和CA125联合使用相比,三种或四种肿瘤标志物联合使用并未提高诊断效能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0345/5968799/778211fa7607/cmar-10-1313Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验