• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

收入分配不均是否有利于环境质量?金砖国家的比较分析。

Is skewed income distribution good for environmental quality? A comparative analysis among selected BRICS countries.

机构信息

Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kharagpur, Medinipur, West Bengal, 721302, India.

Centre for Development Studies (CDS), Prasanth Nagar, Ulloor, Trivandrum, Kerala, 695011, India.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Aug;25(23):23170-23194. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2401-8. Epub 2018 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-018-2401-8
PMID:29862476
Abstract

A large number of studies have examined the linkage between income inequality and environmental quality at the individual country levels. This study attempts to examine the linkage between the two factors for the individual BRICS economies from a comparative perspective, which is scarce in the literature. It examines the selected countries (Brazil, India, China and South Africa) by endogenising the patterns of primary energy consumption (coal use and petroleum use), total primary energy consumption, economic growth, and urbanisation as key determining factors in CO emission function. The long-run results based on ARDL bounds testing revealed that income inequality leads to increase in CO emissions for Brazil, India and China, while the same factor leads to reduction in CO emissions for South Africa. However, it observes that while coal use increases CO emissions for India, China and South Africa, it has no effect for Brazil. In contrast, the use of petroleum products contributes to CO emissions in Brazil, while the use of the same surprisingly results in reduction of carbon emissions in South Africa, India and China. The findings suggest that given the significance of income inequality in environmental pollution, the policy makers in these emerging economies have to take into consideration the role of income inequality, while designing the energy policy to achieve environmental sustainability.

摘要

大量研究考察了在单个国家层面上收入不平等与环境质量之间的关联。本研究试图从比较的角度来检验金砖国家(巴西、印度、中国和南非)的这两个因素之间的关系,这在文献中是很少见的。它通过将主要能源消费(煤炭使用和石油使用)、总初级能源消费、经济增长和城市化等关键决定因素内在化为 CO 排放函数,来检验这些选定国家的情况。基于 ARDL 边界检验的长期结果表明,收入不平等会导致巴西、印度和中国的 CO 排放增加,而同一因素会导致南非的 CO 排放减少。然而,它观察到煤炭使用会增加印度、中国和南非的 CO 排放,但对巴西没有影响。相比之下,石油产品的使用会导致巴西的 CO 排放增加,而令人惊讶的是,同样的使用会导致南非、印度和中国的碳排放量减少。研究结果表明,鉴于收入不平等在环境污染方面的重要性,这些新兴经济体的政策制定者在制定能源政策以实现环境可持续性时,必须考虑收入不平等的作用。

相似文献

1
Is skewed income distribution good for environmental quality? A comparative analysis among selected BRICS countries.收入分配不均是否有利于环境质量?金砖国家的比较分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Aug;25(23):23170-23194. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2401-8. Epub 2018 Jun 3.
2
Analysis of income inequality and environmental pollution in BRICS using fresh asymmetric approach.金砖国家收入不平等与环境污染的非对称分析
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Oct;28(37):51199-51209. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14209-6. Epub 2021 May 12.
3
The heterogeneous effects of urbanization and income inequality on CO emissions in BRICS economies: evidence from panel quantile regression.城市化和收入不平等对金砖国家 CO 排放的非均匀影响:基于面板分位数回归的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jun;25(17):17176-17193. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1900-y. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
4
Asymmetric effects of energy efficiency and renewable energy on carbon emissions of BRICS economies: evidence from nonlinear panel autoregressive distributed lag model.能源效率和可再生能源对金砖国家经济碳排放的非对称影响:来自非线性面板自回归分布滞后模型的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 May;27(15):18254-18268. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08353-8. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
5
Financial development, globalization, and CO emission in the presence of EKC: evidence from BRICS countries.金融发展、全球化与 CO 排放的 EKC 关系:金砖国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Nov;25(31):31283-31296. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3034-7. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
6
The direct and indirect effects of democracy on carbon dioxide emissions in BRICS countries: evidence from panel quantile regression.金砖国家中民主对二氧化碳排放的直接和间接影响:面板分位数回归的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Sep;27(26):33085-33102. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09167-4. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
7
Environmental benefit of clean energy consumption: can BRICS economies achieve environmental sustainability through human capital?清洁能源消费的环境效益:金砖国家经济体能否通过人力资本实现环境可持续性?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(5):6766-6776. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16167-5. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
8
Exploring the impact of innovation, renewable energy consumption, and income on CO2 emissions: new evidence from the BRICS economies.探讨创新、可再生能源消费和收入对二氧化碳排放的影响:来自金砖国家经济体的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(12):13866-13881. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07876-4. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
9
Impact of stock market, renewable energy consumption and urbanization on environmental degradation: new evidence from BRICS countries.股票市场、可再生能源消费和城市化对环境恶化的影响:来自金砖国家的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jun;28(24):31549-31565. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12731-1. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
10
How CO emissions respond to changes in government size and level of digitalization? Evidence from the BRICS countries.CO 排放量如何响应政府规模和数字化水平的变化?来自金砖国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(1):457-467. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15693-6. Epub 2021 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Can Government Environmental Auditing Help to Improve Environmental Quality? Evidence from China.政府环境审计能否有助于改善环境质量?来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 4;20(4):2770. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20042770.
2
The energy consumption-environmental quality nexus in BRICS countries: the role of outward foreign direct investment.金砖国家的能源消耗-环境质量关系:对外直接投资的作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(13):19714-19730. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17180-4. Epub 2021 Oct 31.
3
How Does Income Inequality Influence Environmental Regulation in the Context of Corruption? A Panel Threshold Analysis Based on Chinese Provincial Data.

本文引用的文献

1
Causal relationship between CO₂ emissions, real GDP, energy consumption, financial development, trade openness, and urbanization in Tunisia.突尼斯二氧化碳排放、实际国内生产总值、能源消耗、金融发展、贸易开放度和城市化之间的因果关系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Oct;22(20):15663-76. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4767-1. Epub 2015 May 29.
2
The haves, the have-nots, and the health of everyone: the relationship between social inequality and environmental quality.富人与穷人,以及每个人的健康:社会不平等与环境质量的关系。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:193-209. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122646.
3
The Genetical Interpretation of Statistics of the Third Degree in the Study of Quantitative Inheritance.
收入不平等如何影响腐败背景下的环境监管?基于中国省级数据的面板门槛分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 29;18(15):8050. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158050.
数量遗传研究中三次统计的遗传学解释
Genetics. 1932 Mar;17(2):107-24. doi: 10.1093/genetics/17.2.107.
4
Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions.人口与富裕程度对二氧化碳排放的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jan 7;94(1):175-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.1.175.