• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

这个想法是从哪里来的?对想法感知来源的自我验证分析。

Where Did This Thought Come From? A Self-Validation Analysis of the Perceived Origin of Thoughts.

机构信息

1 Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain.

2 The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Nov;44(11):1615-1628. doi: 10.1177/0146167218775696. Epub 2018 Jun 4.

DOI:10.1177/0146167218775696
PMID:29862884
Abstract

Three experiments examined whether perceiving thoughts as coming from internal versus external origins are more impactful on attitudes. Participants generated either positive or negative thoughts about different attitude objects, including different diets, and plastic surgery. Then, participants were induced to think that their thoughts came from the self or from an external source. In Experiment 1, participants induced to believe their thoughts originated from the self versus an external source relied on them more to form their attitudes. Experiment 2 demonstrated that when the external origin was associated with properties of validity, people relied on their thoughts more than when thoughts were perceived to come from an internal origin associated with low validity. Experiment 3 showed that the impact of thought origin on evaluations was mediated by greater liking for one's thoughts when they originated in the self.

摘要

三项实验检验了将思维感知为源自内部还是外部对态度的影响更大。参与者对不同的态度对象生成了积极或消极的想法,包括不同的饮食和整容手术。然后,参与者被引导认为他们的想法来自自我或外部来源。在实验 1 中,与自我相比,参与者更倾向于依赖被引导为源自外部来源的想法来形成他们的态度。实验 2 表明,当外部来源与有效性的特征相关联时,人们会比将思维感知为来自与低有效性相关联的内部来源时更依赖于自己的想法。实验 3 表明,思维来源对评估的影响是通过当思维源自自我时,人们更喜欢自己的想法来中介的。

相似文献

1
Where Did This Thought Come From? A Self-Validation Analysis of the Perceived Origin of Thoughts.这个想法是从哪里来的?对想法感知来源的自我验证分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Nov;44(11):1615-1628. doi: 10.1177/0146167218775696. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
2
Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: the self-validation hypothesis.将思维自信视为说服的一个决定因素:自我验证假说。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 May;82(5):722-41. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.5.722.
3
Objectification of people and thoughts: An attitude change perspective.对人和思想的物化:一种态度转变的视角。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2017 Jun;56(2):233-249. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12183. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
4
A meta-cognitive approach to doping in sports: The effects of thought validation on attitudes related to doping.一种体育领域中使用兴奋剂的元认知方法:思维验证对与使用兴奋剂相关态度的影响。
J Sports Sci. 2020 Oct;38(19):2242-2252. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1776930. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
5
Motivated reflection on attitude-inconsistent information: an exploration of the role of fear of invalidity in self-persuasion.动机性思考态度不一致信息:对无效恐惧在自我说服中作用的探索。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Dec;39(12):1559-70. doi: 10.1177/0146167213497983. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
6
Emotion and persuasion: cognitive and meta-cognitive processes impact attitudes.情感与说服:认知和元认知过程影响态度。
Cogn Emot. 2015;29(1):1-26. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.967183. Epub 2014 Oct 10.
7
Evaluating the message or the messenger? Implications for self-validation in persuasion.评估信息还是信息传递者?说服中的自我验证的启示。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Dec;39(12):1571-84. doi: 10.1177/0146167213499238. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
8
Incidental experiences of affective coherence and incoherence influence persuasion.偶然的情感连贯和不连贯体验会影响说服效果。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Jun;39(6):792-802. doi: 10.1177/0146167213482588. Epub 2013 Mar 29.
9
Happiness versus sadness as a determinant of thought confidence in persuasion: a self-validation analysis.作为说服中思维信心决定因素的快乐与悲伤:一项自我验证分析
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Nov;93(5):711-27. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.711.
10
Feelings of ease and attitudes toward healthy foods.轻松感以及对健康食品的态度。
Psicothema. 2015;27(3):241-6. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2014.287.

引用本文的文献

1
The association of the persecutory ideation questionnaire with clinically-relevant and other outcomes: the moderating role of confidence.受迫害观念问卷与临床相关和其他结果的关联:信心的调节作用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 9;14(1):15809. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66846-9.