• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发团体治疗的治疗关系监测系统。

Developing a therapeutic relationship monitoring system for group treatment.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University.

Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University.

出版信息

Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018 Jun;55(2):105-115. doi: 10.1037/pst0000139.

DOI:10.1037/pst0000139
PMID:29863391
Abstract

The use of outcome monitoring systems to identify clients that are at-risk for treatment failure has now become part of daily clinical practice, shown in >25 empirical studies to improve client outcomes. These promising findings have led to outcome monitoring systems being recognized as evidence-based. Feedback systems based on client perception of therapeutic processes are recent additions to the monitoring literature, and the research suggests that these too lead to improved outcomes. Unfortunately, feedback systems and research have been primarily limited to individual therapy, creating a knowledge gap for multiperson treatment. This study reports on the development of a therapeutic relationship monitoring system for group treatment using results from 6 Group Questionnaire (GQ) studies conducted in 4 unique clinical populations: nonclinical process, counseling center, European inpatient, and seriously mentally ill inpatients. The GQ is a factor-analytically derived scale, which assesses a client's perception of 3 relationship quality constructs (positive bond, positive work, and negative relationship) across 3 structural domains (member-member, member-leader, and member-group). The first goal of the present study was to replicate the previously established factor structure across each clinical population. The second goal was to establish normative values and relevant feedback alerts for the GQ subscales in each population. Findings support the GQ factor structure across clinical populations, indicating that the constructs measured by the GQ bear similar relationships in each population. Further, findings support the implementation of unique norms and feedback alerts in each clinical population, reflecting the reality of meaningful differences between clinical populations. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

使用成果监测系统来识别有治疗失败风险的客户,现在已成为日常临床实践的一部分,在超过 25 项实证研究中显示,这可以改善客户的结果。这些有希望的发现使得成果监测系统被认为是基于证据的。基于客户对治疗过程的感知的反馈系统是监测文献的最新补充,研究表明,这些系统也可以带来更好的结果。不幸的是,反馈系统和研究主要局限于个体治疗,为多人治疗创造了一个知识空白。本研究报告了使用在 4 个独特的临床群体中进行的 6 项小组问卷(Group Questionnaire,GQ)研究的结果,为小组治疗开发一种治疗关系监测系统的情况:非临床过程、咨询中心、欧洲住院患者和严重精神疾病住院患者。GQ 是一种基于因素分析的量表,评估客户对 3 种关系质量结构(积极联系、积极工作和消极关系)在 3 个结构领域(成员-成员、成员-领导和成员-小组)的感知。本研究的第一个目标是在每个临床群体中复制先前建立的因素结构。第二个目标是为每个群体的 GQ 子量表建立规范值和相关反馈警报。研究结果支持了 GQ 在临床群体中的因素结构,表明 GQ 衡量的结构在每个群体中都具有相似的关系。此外,研究结果支持在每个临床群体中实施独特的规范和反馈警报,反映了临床群体之间存在有意义差异的现实。

相似文献

1
Developing a therapeutic relationship monitoring system for group treatment.开发团体治疗的治疗关系监测系统。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018 Jun;55(2):105-115. doi: 10.1037/pst0000139.
2
The effects of relationship and progress feedback in group psychotherapy using the Group Questionnaire and Outcome Questionnaire-45: A randomized clinical trial.使用团体问卷和结果问卷-45 在团体心理治疗中关系和进展反馈的效果:一项随机临床试验。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018 Jun;55(2):116-131. doi: 10.1037/pst0000133.
3
An item reduction analysis of the Group Questionnaire.群体问卷的项目缩减分析。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018 Jun;55(2):144-150. doi: 10.1037/pst0000145.
4
Do clinicians really use feedback-monitoring systems? A qualitative analysis of 16 group leaders.临床医生真的会使用反馈监测系统吗?对 16 位组长的定性分析。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018 Jun;55(2):132-143. doi: 10.1037/pst0000141.
5
Practice-based evidence can help! Using the Group Questionnaire to enhance clinical practice.基于实践的证据可以提供帮助!使用团体问卷增强临床实践。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018 Jun;55(2):196-202. doi: 10.1037/pst0000136.
6
It's complicated: Using group member process-feedback to improve group therapist effectiveness.这很复杂:利用小组成员的过程反馈来提高团体治疗师的有效性。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018 Jun;55(2):164-169. doi: 10.1037/pst0000146.
7
Clients' and therapists' views of the therapeutic alliance: similarities, differences and relationship to therapy outcome.患者和治疗师对治疗联盟的看法:相似性、差异性及其与治疗效果的关系。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2013 Mar-Apr;20(2):118-35. doi: 10.1002/cpp.792. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
8
Introduction to special issue: Feedback in group psychotherapy.特刊介绍:团体心理治疗中的反馈。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018 Jun;55(2):101-104. doi: 10.1037/pst0000178.
9
Cohesion in group therapy.团体治疗中的凝聚力。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2011 Mar;48(1):34-42. doi: 10.1037/a0022063.
10
Modeling group process constructs at three stages in group psychotherapy.在团体心理治疗的三个阶段建立团体过程结构模型。
Psychother Res. 2009 May;19(3):332-43. doi: 10.1080/10503300902894430.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of a conversational, videoconferencing-based therapy group for postpartum depression and anxiety symptoms: A pragmatic evaluation.实施基于视频会议的产后抑郁和焦虑症状对话治疗小组:一项实用性评估。
Digit Health. 2024 Aug 5;10:20552076241269630. doi: 10.1177/20552076241269630. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Italian adaptation of the Group Questionnaire: validity and factorial structure.团体问卷的意大利语改编版:效度与因子结构
Res Psychother. 2020 Sep 7;23(2):443. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2020.443.