• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

苏格兰肠道筛查计划结肠镜检查质量-有改进的空间吗?

Scottish Bowel Screening Programme colonoscopy quality - scope for improvement?

机构信息

Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.

Information Services Division, NHS National Services Scotland, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2018 Sep;20(9):O277-O283. doi: 10.1111/codi.14281. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1111/codi.14281
PMID:29863812
Abstract

AIM

The delivery of the Scottish Bowel Screening Programme (SBoSP) is rooted in the provision of a high quality, effective and participant-centred service. Safe and effective colonoscopy forms an integral part of the process. Additional accreditation as part of a multi-faceted programme for participating colonoscopists, as in England, does not exist in Scotland. This study aimed to describe the quality of colonoscopy in the SBoSP and compare this to the English national screening standards.

METHODS

Data were collected from the SBoSP between 2007 and 2014. End-points for analysis were caecal intubation, cancer, polyp and adenoma detection, and complications. Overall results were compared with 2012 published English national standards for screening and outcomes from 2006 to 2009.

RESULTS

During the study period 53 332 participants attended for colonoscopy. The colonoscopy completion rate was 95.6% overall. The mean cancer detection rate was 7.1%, the polyp detection rate was 45.7% and the adenoma detection rate was 35.5%. The overall complication rate was 0.47%.

CONCLUSION

Colonoscopy quality in the SBoSP has exceeded the standard set for screening colonoscopy in England, despite not adopting a multi-faceted programme for screening colonoscopy. However, the overall adenoma detection rate in Scotland was 9.1% lower than that in England which has implications for colonoscopy quality and may have an impact on cancer prevention rates, a key aim of the SBoSP.

摘要

目的

苏格兰肠道筛查计划(SBoSP)的实施基于提供高质量、有效且以参与者为中心的服务。安全有效的结肠镜检查是该计划的重要组成部分。在英格兰,参与结肠镜检查的医生需要通过多方面的认证计划来获得额外的认证,但在苏格兰,这种认证并不存在。本研究旨在描述 SBoSP 中的结肠镜检查质量,并将其与英国国家筛查标准进行比较。

方法

数据收集自 2007 年至 2014 年的 SBoSP。分析的终点为盲肠插管、癌症、息肉和腺瘤的检出率以及并发症。总体结果与 2012 年英国国家筛查标准和 2006 年至 2009 年的筛查结果进行比较。

结果

在研究期间,共有 53332 名参与者接受了结肠镜检查。结肠镜检查完成率总体为 95.6%。平均癌症检出率为 7.1%,息肉检出率为 45.7%,腺瘤检出率为 35.5%。总体并发症发生率为 0.47%。

结论

尽管苏格兰没有采用多方面的结肠镜检查筛查计划,但 SBoSP 的结肠镜检查质量已经超过了英格兰为筛查结肠镜检查设定的标准。然而,苏格兰的总体腺瘤检出率比英格兰低 9.1%,这对结肠镜检查质量有影响,并可能对癌症预防率产生影响,这是 SBoSP 的一个关键目标。

相似文献

1
Scottish Bowel Screening Programme colonoscopy quality - scope for improvement?苏格兰肠道筛查计划结肠镜检查质量-有改进的空间吗?
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Sep;20(9):O277-O283. doi: 10.1111/codi.14281. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
2
Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.结肠镜检查质量指标:来自英国国民保健署结直肠癌筛查计划的经验。
Gut. 2012 Jul;61(7):1050-7. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300651. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
3
The impact of hypothetical PErsonalised Risk Information on informed choice and intention to undergo Colorectal Cancer screening colonoscopy in Scotland (PERICCS)-a randomised controlled trial.假设的个性化风险信息对苏格兰结直肠癌筛查结肠镜检查的知情选择和意向的影响(PERICCS)-一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med. 2020 Oct 20;18(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01750-3.
4
Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).免疫化学粪便潜血试验在结直肠癌筛查项目中结肠镜检查的质量:EQuIPE 研究(评估内镜性能质量指标)。
Gut. 2015 Sep;64(9):1389-96. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307954. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
5
Impact of cumulative experience on the quality of screening colonoscopy: A 13-year observational study.累积经验对结肠镜筛查质量的影响:一项长达 13 年的观察性研究。
J Med Screen. 2021 Dec;28(4):433-438. doi: 10.1177/09691413211009562. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
6
The impact of personalised risk information compared to a positive/negative result on informed choice and intention to undergo colonoscopy following colorectal Cancer screening in Scotland (PERICCS) - a randomised controlled trial: study protocol.苏格兰基于结直肠癌筛查的个人化风险信息对比阳性/阴性结果对知情选择和接受结肠镜检查意向的影响(PERICCS)-一项随机对照试验:研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Apr 16;19(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6734-0.
7
The first 3 years of national bowel cancer screening at a single UK tertiary centre.英国一家三级中心开展全国结直肠癌筛查的头 3 年。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Feb;14(2):166-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02567.x.
8
Adenoma detection rates in an opportunistic screening colonoscopy program in Iran, a country with rising colorectal cancer incidence.在伊朗这个结直肠癌发病率不断上升的国家,一项机会性筛查结肠镜检查项目中的腺瘤检出率。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 18;14:196. doi: 10.1186/s12876-014-0196-8.
9
Differences in screening vs non-screening colonoscopy: scope for improvement?筛查与非筛查结肠镜检查的差异:有改进的空间吗?
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Sep;18(9):903-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.13291.
10
High resolution colonoscopy in a bowel cancer screening program improves polyp detection.在结直肠癌筛查项目中进行高分辨率结肠镜检查可提高息肉检出率。
World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Oct 14;17(38):4308-13. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i38.4308.

引用本文的文献

1
Improved use of faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin in the Scottish bowel screening programme.提高粪便免疫化学试验在苏格兰肠道筛查计划中检测血红蛋白的应用。
J Med Screen. 2023 Dec;30(4):184-190. doi: 10.1177/09691413231175611. Epub 2023 May 25.
2
Calibrating Natural History of Cancer Models in the Presence of Data Incompatibility: Problems and Solutions.在存在数据不兼容的情况下校准癌症模型的自然史:问题与解决方案。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Apr;40(4):359-366. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01125-3. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
3
Adverse events of colonoscopy in a colorectal cancer screening program with fecal immunochemical testing: a population-based observational study.
在一项采用粪便免疫化学检测的结直肠癌筛查项目中结肠镜检查的不良事件:一项基于人群的观察性研究。
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Feb;9(2):E224-E232. doi: 10.1055/a-1324-2763. Epub 2021 Feb 3.