• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险管理式医疗中的网络优化与医师的连续性。

Network Optimization And The Continuity Of Physicians In Medicaid Managed Care.

机构信息

Chima D. Ndumele (

Becky Staiger is a graduate student in the Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Jun;37(6):929-935. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1410.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1410
PMID:29863934
Abstract

Health plans use selective physician networks to control costs while improving quality. However, narrow (limited) networks raise concerns about reduced access to and continuity of care. In the period 2010-15, the proportion of Medicaid managed care plans in fourteen states with narrow primary care physician networks-that is, the plans that employed 30 percent or less of those physicians in their market-declined from a peak of 42 percent in 2011 to 27 percent in 2015. On average, plans experienced a 12 percent annual turnover rate, with 34 percent of primary care physicians exiting within five years. Turnover was 3 percentage points higher in plans with narrow networks after one year, and 20 percentage points higher after five years, compared to turnover in plans with non-narrow networks. These findings suggest that efforts to maintain adequate physician networks must monitor not only the breadth of the networks, but also the continuity within them.

摘要

健康计划利用选择性医生网络来控制成本,同时提高质量。然而,狭窄(有限)的网络引起了人们对医疗服务获取和连续性的担忧。在 2010 年至 2015 年期间,在 14 个州,拥有狭窄初级保健医生网络的医疗补助管理式医疗计划(即那些在市场上雇佣了 30%或以下医生的计划)的比例从 2011 年的 42%的峰值下降到 2015 年的 27%。平均而言,计划的年度人员流动率为 12%,其中 34%的初级保健医生在五年内离职。与非狭窄网络计划相比,在网络狭窄的计划中,一年后的人员流动率高出 3 个百分点,五年后高出 20 个百分点。这些发现表明,为维持足够的医生网络所做的努力不仅必须监测网络的广度,还必须监测网络内的连续性。

相似文献

1
Network Optimization And The Continuity Of Physicians In Medicaid Managed Care.医疗保险管理式医疗中的网络优化与医师的连续性。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Jun;37(6):929-935. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1410.
2
The impact of financial incentives on physician behavior in managed care plans: a review of the evidence.经济激励措施对管理式医疗计划中医务人员行为的影响:证据综述
Med Care Res Rev. 1996 Sep;53(3):294-314. doi: 10.1177/107755879605300305.
3
Managing the physician: rules versus incentives.管理医生:规则与激励措施
Health Aff (Millwood). 1991 Winter;10(4):138-46. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.10.4.138.
4
Medicaid Managed Care's Effects on Costs, Access, and Quality: An Update.医疗补助管理式医疗对成本、可及性和质量的影响:最新进展。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2020 Apr 2;41:537-549. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094345.
5
Physicians' perceptions of commercial and Medicaid managed care plans: a comparison.医生对商业医疗保险和医疗补助管理式医疗计划的看法:一项比较研究。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1997 Feb;22(1):5-21. doi: 10.1215/03616878-22-1-5.
6
Fee-For-Service, While Much Maligned, Remains The Dominant Payment Method For Physician Visits.按服务收费虽备受诟病,但仍是门诊诊疗的主要支付方式。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Mar;35(3):411-4. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1291.
7
Has the influence of managed care waned? Evidence from the market for physician services.管理式医疗的影响是否已经减弱?来自医师服务市场的证据。
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2010 Mar;10(1):85-103. doi: 10.1007/s10754-009-9073-3. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
8
Perceived financial incentives, HMO market penetration, and physicians' practice styles and satisfaction.感知到的经济激励、健康维护组织(HMO)的市场渗透率以及医生的执业风格与满意度。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Apr;34(1 Pt 2):307-21.
9
Managed care plan performance since 1980. A literature analysis.1980年以来的管理式医疗计划绩效:文献分析
JAMA. 1994 May 18;271(19):1512-9.
10
Medicaid managed care: state experiences.医疗补助管理式医疗:各州的经验
Bull N Y Acad Med. 1996 Winter;73(2 Suppl):496-505.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the patient-sharing network in hypertension management: a retrospective study in China.高血压管理中患者共享网络的分析:一项中国的回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 13;15(3):e093684. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093684.
2
State-Level Variation in Medicaid Managed Care Enrollment and Specialty Care for Publicly Insured Children.州级层面的医疗补助管理式医疗参保率和公众保险儿童专科护理的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2336415. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36415.
3
North Carolina's Medicaid Transformation: the Early Enrollee Experience.
北卡罗来纳州医疗补助计划的转型:早期参保者的体验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Nov;38(15):3295-3302. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08319-9. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
4
Evaluating the accessibility and value of U.S. ambulatory care among Medicaid expansion states and non-expansion states, 2012-2015.评估 2012-2015 年美国在扩大医疗补助计划的州和非扩大医疗补助计划的州的门诊护理的可及性和价值。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 3;23(1):723. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09696-x.
5
Geographical Variations In Emergency Department Visits For Mental Health Conditions For Medicaid Beneficiaries.医疗补助受益人的精神健康状况在急诊科就诊的地域差异。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Feb;42(2):172-181. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00796.
6
Disruptions to the patient-provider relationship and patient utilization and outcomes: Evidence from medicaid managed care.破坏医患关系和患者利用及结果:来自医疗补助管理式医疗的证据。
J Health Econ. 2022 Jan;81:102574. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102574. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
7
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Managed Care Enrollment Among US Children.美国儿童在管理式医疗参保中的种族和民族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e214162. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.4162.
8
Out-Of-Network Spending Mostly Declined In Privately Insured Populations With A Few Notable Exceptions From 2008 To 2016.2008年至2016年期间,在大多数享有私人保险的人群中,网络外支出有所下降,但也有一些显著的例外情况。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jun;39(6):1032-1041. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01776.
9
Association of Provider Performance with Changes in Insurance Networks.医疗服务提供者绩效与保险网络变化的关联
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jul;35(7):1997-2002. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05784-4. Epub 2020 May 6.
10
Comparison of Office-Based Physician Participation in Medicaid Managed Care and Health Insurance Exchange Plans in the Same US Geographic Markets.美国同一地理市场中,以办公室为基础的医生参与医疗补助管理式医疗和健康保险交易所计划的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202727. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2727.