• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Out-Of-Network Spending Mostly Declined In Privately Insured Populations With A Few Notable Exceptions From 2008 To 2016.2008年至2016年期间,在大多数享有私人保险的人群中,网络外支出有所下降,但也有一些显著的例外情况。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jun;39(6):1032-1041. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01776.
2
Out-of-Network Air Ambulance Bills: Prevalence, Magnitude, and Policy Solutions.非联网空中救护账单:流行程度、规模和政策解决方案。
Milbank Q. 2020 Sep;98(3):747-774. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12464. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
3
Frequency and Costs of Out-of-Network Bills for Outpatient Laboratory Services Among Privately Insured Patients.私人保险患者门诊实验室服务的网络外账单的频率和费用。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Jun 1;181(6):834-841. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1422.
4
The impacts of New York's balance billing regulation on ground ambulance pricing.纽约平衡计费法规对地面救护车定价的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr;60(2):e14387. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14387. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
5
Understanding Surprise Out-of-Network Billing in Hand and Upper Extremity Care.理解手和上肢护理中的意外网络外计费。
J Hand Surg Am. 2021 Mar;46(3):236-240. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.11.008. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
6
Policies to address surprise billing can affect health insurance premiums.解决意外计费问题的政策会影响健康保险费。
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Sep;26(9):401-404. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.88491.
7
Out-of-network bills among privately insured patients undergoing hysterectomy.私营保险患者接受子宫切除术的网络外账单。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Apr;226(4):543.e1-543.e45. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.027. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
8
Association of Surprise-Billing Legislation with Prices Paid to In-Network and Out-of-Network Anesthesiologists in California, Florida, and New York: An Economic Analysis.加利福尼亚州、佛罗里达州和纽约州意外账单立法与支付给网络内和网络外麻醉医师的价格之间的关联:一项经济分析
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Oct 1;181(10):1324-1331. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4564.
9
Prevalence And Characteristics Of Surprise Out-Of-Network Bills From Professionals In Ambulatory Surgery Centers.门诊手术中心专业人员意外的非网络账单的患病率及特征
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 May;39(5):783-790. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01138. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
10
Sources of Geographic Variation in Health Care Spending Among Individuals With Employer Sponsored Insurance.个人拥有雇主赞助保险的医疗保健支出的地理差异来源。
Med Care Res Rev. 2021 Oct;78(5):548-560. doi: 10.1177/1077558720926095. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Growth In Patient Cost Sharing For Hospitalizations With And Without Intensive Care Among Commercially Insured Patients.商业保险患者住院费用中有无重症监护病房的患者自付费用增长情况。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Sep;42(9):1221-1229. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00419.
2
Options for states to constrain pricing power of health care providers.各州限制医疗服务提供者定价权的方式。
Front Health Serv. 2022 Oct 19;2:1020920. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.1020920. eCollection 2022.
3
Research and policy to strengthen the employer-sponsored health insurance market.加强雇主赞助医疗保险市场的研究与政策。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun;57(3):439-442. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13982. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
4
Quantifying Balance Billing for Out-of-Network Behavioral Health Care in Employer-Sponsored Insurance.量化雇主赞助保险中网络外行为健康护理的平衡计费。
Psychiatr Serv. 2022 Sep 1;73(9):1019-1026. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100157. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
5
Out-of-Network Laboratory Test Spending, Utilization, and Prices in the US.美国的网络外实验室检测支出、使用情况和价格。
JAMA. 2021 Apr 27;325(16):1674-1676. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0720.
6
Changes in Hospital Income, Use, and Quality Associated With Private Equity Acquisition.与私募股权投资收购相关的医院收入、使用和质量的变化。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Nov 1;180(11):1428-1435. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3552.
7
Prices And Cost Sharing For Psychotherapy In Network Versus Out Of Network In The United States.美国网络内与网络外心理治疗的价格和费用分担。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jul;39(7):1210-1218. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01468.

本文引用的文献

1
Out-of-Network Spending on Behavioral Health, 2008-2016.2008 - 2016年行为健康领域的非网络支出
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jan;36(1):232-234. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05665-w. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
2
Out-Of-Network Billing And Negotiated Payments For Hospital-Based Physicians.医院医师的网络外计费和协商支付
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jan;39(1):24-32. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00507. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
3
Health Care Spending, Utilization, and Quality 8 Years into Global Payment.全球支付实施 8 年后的医疗保健支出、利用和质量
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 18;381(3):252-263. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1813621.
4
Variation In Health Spending Growth For The Privately Insured From 2007 To 2014.2007 年至 2014 年私营保险者健康支出增长的变化。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Feb;38(2):230-236. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05245.
5
Medicare Advantage And Commercial Prices For Mental Health Services.医疗保险优势计划和精神健康服务的商业价格。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Feb;38(2):262-267. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05226.
6
Prices for Physicians' Services in Medicare Advantage and Commercial Plans.医疗保险优势计划和商业计划中的医师服务价格。
Med Care Res Rev. 2020 Jun;77(3):236-248. doi: 10.1177/1077558718780604. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
7
Network Optimization And The Continuity Of Physicians In Medicaid Managed Care.医疗保险管理式医疗中的网络优化与医师的连续性。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Jun;37(6):929-935. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1410.
8
Using Medicare Prices - Toward Equity and Affordability in the ACA Marketplace.
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 14;377(24):2309-2311. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1710020. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
9
Evaluating the Impact of Policies to Regulate Involuntary Out-of-Network Charges on New Jersey Hospitals.评估监管新泽西州医院非自愿网络外收费政策的影响。
Rand Health Q. 2017 Jan 1;6(4):7. eCollection 2017 Jan.
10
Narrow Networks On The Health Insurance Marketplaces: Prevalence, Pricing, And The Cost Of Network Breadth.医疗保险市场的窄带网络:流行程度、定价和网络广度的成本。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Sep 1;36(9):1606-1614. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1669.

2008年至2016年期间,在大多数享有私人保险的人群中,网络外支出有所下降,但也有一些显著的例外情况。

Out-Of-Network Spending Mostly Declined In Privately Insured Populations With A Few Notable Exceptions From 2008 To 2016.

作者信息

Song Zirui, Johnson William, Kennedy Kevin, Biniek Jean Fuglesten, Wallace Jacob

机构信息

Zirui Song (

William Johnson is a senior researcher at the Health Care Cost Institute, in Washington, D.C.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jun;39(6):1032-1041. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01776.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01776
PMID:32479236
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8299541/
Abstract

While out-of-network or potential "surprise" billing has garnered increasing attention, particularly in emergency department and inpatient settings, few national studies have examined out-of-network care overall or in other settings. We examined out-of-network spending and use among two large nationwide populations with employer-sponsored insurance. In a primary sample of 27,883,040 people in data for 2008-16 from the Truven MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database, we found that the unadjusted share of total spending that occurred out of network decreased from 7.0 percent in 2008-10 to 6.1 percent in 2014-16, an adjusted average decline of 0.10 percentage points per year. Using a secondary sample of 13,093,209 people in the Health Care Cost Institute database provided qualitatively similar results, including when provider charges (upper bound for balance billing) were used in place of observed out-of-network prices. In subgroup analyses of the primary sample, the share of out-of-network spending was stable or declined among all segments of care except hospitalist services, pathologist services, and laboratory tests across the study period. Out-of-network use demonstrated comparable patterns. Prices were higher out of network than in network. Policy makers should focus their efforts on protecting consumers from balance billing or potential surprise billing in clinical scenarios where patients often have little choice over their provider.

摘要

尽管网络外就医或潜在的“意外”账单问题日益受到关注,尤其是在急诊科和住院环境中,但很少有全国性研究全面考察网络外就医情况或其他环境中的情况。我们研究了两个拥有雇主赞助保险的全国性大群体的网络外支出和使用情况。在2008 - 2016年来自Truven MarketScan商业理赔和就诊数据库的27,883,040人的主要样本中,我们发现网络外支出占总支出的未调整比例从2008 - 2010年的7.0%降至2014 - 2016年的6.1%,经调整后平均每年下降0.10个百分点。在医疗保健成本研究所数据库中对13,093,209人的二次样本进行分析,得出了定性相似的结果,包括使用提供者收费(差额账单上限)代替观察到的网络外价格时。在主要样本的亚组分析中,除了在整个研究期间的住院医师服务、病理学家服务和实验室检查外,网络外支出份额在所有护理环节中保持稳定或下降。网络外使用情况呈现出类似模式。网络外价格高于网络内价格。政策制定者应致力于保护消费者免受差额账单或临床场景中潜在意外账单的影响,在这些场景中患者通常对其提供者几乎没有选择权。