Department of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA.
School of Community Health Sciences, Counselling and Counselling Psychology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Oct;50(10):2156-2163. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001679.
Physical inactivity has been linked to rates of obesity, diabetes, and heart disease through insulin resistance and other mechanisms. Although sedentary workplace environments have unintentionally contributed to the risk for chronic diseases, innovations in the workplace environment could potentially rectify this public and occupational health problem.
To evaluate the effects of light-intensity physical activity using a pedal desk (PD) compared with a standard desk (STD) in a pilot study on postprandial metabolic responses and work skills.
Twelve overweight/obese full-time sedentary office workers (six men and six women; body mass index, 28.7 ± 3.6 kg·m) were tested in two conditions: 1) PD, pedaling at self-selected light-intensity pace for 2 h and 2) STD, remaining seated for 2 h in a conventional workstation setup while performing scripted computer-based work tasks. Blood samples were analyzed for plasma glucose, insulin, and free-fatty acids in response to a standardized meal and work skills were evaluated. Paired samples t-tests were used to examine the differences in metabolic responses and work performance tasks between the conditions.
Pedal desk use required significantly less insulin to maintain glucose concentrations compared with STD condition (peak insulin concentration, 42.1 μU·mL vs 66.9 μU·mL; P = 0.03; and area under the curve, 302.6 vs 441.8 μU·min·mL; P < 0.001). No significant changes in plasma glucose and free-fatty acid concentrations were observed at any timepoints (all P > 0.05). In addition, pedaling at a self-paced rate caused no adverse effects on work skills (P > 0.05).
The PD resulted in lower postmeal insulin concentrations without an overall negative impact on work skills. Thus, the PD could have the potential to achieve public and occupational health goals in sedentary work environments.
身体活动不足通过胰岛素抵抗和其他机制与肥胖、糖尿病和心脏病的发病率有关。尽管久坐的工作环境无意中增加了患慢性病的风险,但工作环境的创新有可能纠正这一公共和职业健康问题。
评估使用脚踏板办公桌(PD)进行低强度体力活动与标准办公桌(STD)相比在餐后代谢反应和工作技能方面的影响。
12 名超重/肥胖的全职久坐办公室工作人员(6 名男性和 6 名女性;体重指数,28.7 ± 3.6 kg·m)在两种条件下进行测试:1)PD,以自我选择的低强度速度踩踏 2 小时,2)STD,在常规工作站设置中保持坐姿 2 小时,同时执行脚本化的基于计算机的工作任务。分析血液样本以检测血浆葡萄糖、胰岛素和游离脂肪酸对标准化餐食的反应,评估工作技能。采用配对样本 t 检验比较两种条件下代谢反应和工作表现任务的差异。
与 STD 条件相比,使用脚踏板办公桌需要显著较少的胰岛素来维持血糖浓度(峰值胰岛素浓度,42.1 μU·mL 与 66.9 μU·mL;P = 0.03;曲线下面积,302.6 μU·min·mL 与 441.8 μU·min·mL;P < 0.001)。在任何时间点都未观察到血浆葡萄糖和游离脂肪酸浓度的显著变化(均 P > 0.05)。此外,以自我设定的速度踩踏不会对工作技能产生不利影响(P > 0.05)。
PD 导致餐后胰岛素浓度降低,而不会对工作技能产生总体负面影响。因此,PD 有可能在久坐的工作环境中实现公共和职业健康目标。