Suppr超能文献

自选强度使用工作站替代物时的能量消耗。

Energy Expenditure While Using Workstation Alternatives at Self-Selected Intensities.

出版信息

J Phys Act Health. 2019 Feb 1;16(2):141-148. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2017-0675. Epub 2019 Jan 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Active workstations offer the potential for augmenting energy expenditure (EE) in sedentary occupations. However, comparisons of EE during pedal and treadmill desk usage at self-selected intensities are lacking.

METHODS

A sample of 16 adult participants (8 men and 8 women; 33.9 [7.1] y, 22.5 [2.7] kg/m) employed in sedentary occupations had their EE measured using indirect calorimetry during 4 conditions: (1) seated rest, (2) seated typing in a traditional office chair, (3) self-paced pedaling on a pedal desk while typing, and (4) self-paced walking on a treadmill desk while typing.

RESULTS

For men and women, self-paced pedal and treadmill desk typing significantly increased EE above seated typing (pedal desk: +1.20 to 1.28 kcal/min and treadmill desk: +1.43 to 1.93 kcal/min, P < .001). In men, treadmill desk typing (3.46 [0.19] kcal/min) elicited a significantly higher mean EE than pedal desk typing (2.73 [0.21] kcal/min, P < .001). No significant difference in EE was observed between treadmill desk typing (2.68 [0.19] kcal/min) and pedal desk typing among women (2.52 [0.21] kcal/min).

CONCLUSIONS

Self-paced treadmill desk usage elicited significantly higher EE than self-paced pedal desk usage in men but not in women. Both pedal and treadmill desk usage at self-selected intensities elicited approximate 2-fold increases in EE above what would typically be expected during traditional seated office work.

摘要

背景

活动式工作站具备提升久坐职业人群能量消耗(EE)的潜力。然而, pedal 和 treadmill desk 在自我选择强度下使用时 EE 的比较仍缺乏相关研究。

方法

16 名成年参与者(8 名男性,8 名女性;33.9[7.1]岁,22.5[2.7]kg/m²)参与了这项研究,他们从事久坐职业,通过间接热量测定法在以下 4 种条件下测量 EE:(1)坐姿休息,(2)坐在传统办公椅上打字,(3)在 pedal 桌上自行调节速度踏车打字,以及(4)在 treadmill 桌上自行调节速度步行打字。

结果

对于男性和女性,自我调节速度的 pedal 和 treadmill 桌打字显著增加了 EE,高于坐姿打字(pedal 桌:+1.20 至 1.28 kcal/min;treadmill 桌:+1.43 至 1.93 kcal/min,P<.001)。在男性中, treadmill 桌打字(3.46[0.19]kcal/min)比 pedal 桌打字(2.73[0.21]kcal/min)产生的平均 EE 显著更高(P<.001)。在女性中,treadmill 桌打字(2.68[0.19]kcal/min)和 pedal 桌打字(2.52[0.21]kcal/min)之间的 EE 没有显著差异。

结论

在男性中,自我调节速度的 treadmill 桌使用比 pedal 桌使用产生的 EE 显著更高,但在女性中则不然。自我选择强度 pedal 和 treadmill 桌使用均能使 EE 增加约 2 倍,高于传统坐姿办公时的预期水平。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验