Department of Assessment and Evaluation, Institute of Medical Education, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
FAIMER, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 4;13(6):e0198009. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198009. eCollection 2018.
Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) and Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) are used as formative assessments worldwide. Since an up-to-date comprehensive synthesis of the educational impact of Mini-CEX and DOPS is lacking, we performed a systematic review. Moreover, as the educational impact might be influenced by characteristics of the setting in which Mini-CEX and DOPS take place or their implementation status, we additionally investigated these potential influences.
We searched Scopus, Web of Science, and Ovid, including All Ovid Journals, Embase, ERIC, Ovid MEDLINE(R), and PsycINFO, for original research articles investigating the educational impact of Mini-CEX and DOPS on undergraduate and postgraduate trainees from all health professions, published in English or German from 1995 to 2016. Educational impact was operationalized and classified using Barr's adaptation of Kirkpatrick's four-level model. Where applicable, outcomes were pooled in meta-analyses, separately for Mini-CEX and DOPS. To examine potential influences, we used Fisher's exact test for count data.
We identified 26 articles demonstrating heterogeneous effects of Mini-CEX and DOPS on learners' reactions (Kirkpatrick Level 1) and positive effects of Mini-CEX and DOPS on trainees' performance (Kirkpatrick Level 2b; Mini-CEX: standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.26, p = 0.014; DOPS: SMD = 3.33, p<0.001). No studies were found on higher Kirkpatrick levels. Regarding potential influences, we found two implementation characteristics, "quality" and "participant responsiveness", to be associated with the educational impact.
Despite the limited evidence, the meta-analyses demonstrated positive effects of Mini-CEX and DOPS on trainee performance. Additionally, we revealed implementation characteristics to be associated with the educational impact. Hence, we assume that considering implementation characteristics could increase the educational impact of Mini-CEX and DOPS.
迷你临床演练评估(Mini-CEX)和直接观察操作技能(DOPS)被广泛用于形成性评估。由于缺乏对 Mini-CEX 和 DOPS 教育影响的最新综合评价,我们进行了系统评价。此外,由于 Mini-CEX 和 DOPS 实施的环境特点或实施情况可能会影响其教育效果,我们还研究了这些潜在影响。
我们在 Scopus、Web of Science 和 Ovid 数据库(包括所有 Ovid 期刊、Embase、ERIC、Ovid MEDLINE(R)和 PsycINFO)中搜索了 1995 年至 2016 年间发表的关于 Mini-CEX 和 DOPS 对所有健康专业本科和研究生学员的教育影响的原始研究文章,这些文章为英文或德文。使用 Barr 对 Kirkpatrick 四级模型的改编,将教育效果进行操作化和分类。在适用的情况下,分别对 Mini-CEX 和 DOPS 进行荟萃分析以合并结果。为了检验潜在影响,我们使用 Fisher 确切检验对计数数据进行分析。
我们共确定了 26 篇文章,这些文章展示了 Mini-CEX 和 DOPS 对学习者反应(Kirkpatrick 一级)的不同影响,以及 Mini-CEX 和 DOPS 对学员表现(Kirkpatrick 二级 b)的积极影响;Mini-CEX:标准化均数差(SMD)=0.26,p=0.014;DOPS:SMD=3.33,p<0.001)。没有发现更高级 Kirkpatrick 水平的研究。关于潜在影响,我们发现了两个实施特征,“质量”和“参与者响应性”与教育效果相关。
尽管证据有限,但荟萃分析表明 Mini-CEX 和 DOPS 对学员表现有积极影响。此外,我们还发现实施特征与教育效果相关。因此,我们假设考虑实施特征可以提高 Mini-CEX 和 DOPS 的教育效果。