Cumming Toby B, Lowe Danielle, Linden Thomas, Bernhardt Julie
Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Assessment. 2020 Jul;27(5):976-981. doi: 10.1177/1073191118771516. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a widely used cognitive screening tool in stroke. As scoring the visuospatial/executive MoCA items involves subjective judgement, reliability is important. Analyzing data on these items from A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT), we compared the original scoring of assessors ( = 102) to blind scoring by a single, independent rater. In a sample of scoresheets from 1,119 participants, we found variable interrater reliability. The match between original assessors and the independent rater was the following: trail-making 97% (κ = 0.94), cube copy 90% (κ = 0.80), clock contour 92% (κ = 0.49), clock numbers 89% (κ = 0.67), and clock hands 72% (κ = 0.46). For all items except clock contour, the independent rater was "stricter" than the original assessors. Discrepancies were typically errors in original scoring, rather than borderline differences in subjective judgement. In trials that include the MoCA, researchers should emphasize scoring rules to assessors and implement independent data checking, especially for clock hands, to maximize accuracy.
蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)是一种在中风领域广泛使用的认知筛查工具。由于对MoCA量表中的视觉空间/执行功能项目进行评分涉及主观判断,因此可靠性很重要。通过分析一项极早期康复试验(AVERT)中这些项目的数据,我们将评估者(n = 102)的原始评分与由一名独立评分者进行的盲法评分进行了比较。在来自1119名参与者的评分表样本中,我们发现评分者间的可靠性存在差异。原始评估者与独立评分者之间的匹配情况如下:连线测验为97%(κ = 0.94),立方体复制为90%(κ = 0.80),时钟轮廓为92%(κ = 0.49),时钟数字为89%(κ = 0.67),时钟指针为72%(κ = 0.46)。除时钟轮廓外,对于所有项目,独立评分者比原始评估者“更严格”。差异通常是原始评分中的错误,而非主观判断中的临界差异。在包含MoCA量表的试验中,研究人员应向评估者强调评分规则,并实施独立的数据检查,尤其是针对时钟指针项目,以最大限度地提高准确性。