• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessing Item-Level Fit for the DINA Model.评估DINA模型的项目水平拟合度。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2015 Oct;39(7):525-538. doi: 10.1177/0146621615583050. Epub 2015 May 5.
2
The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination.使用 Rasch 和确定性输入、嘈杂“与”门诊断分类模型对每个内容领域的掌握程度的准确性和一致性:一项基于韩国医师执照考试数据的模拟研究和真实世界分析。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:15. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.15. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
3
Cognitive diagnosis modelling incorporating item response times.结合项目反应时间的认知诊断建模
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2018 May;71(2):262-286. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12114. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
4
Utilizing response times in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing under the higher-order deterministic input, noisy 'and' gate model.利用高阶确定性输入、噪声“与”门模型下认知诊断计算机自适应测验中的反应时间。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2020 Feb;73(1):109-141. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12160. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
5
Assessing fit of alternative unidimensional polytomous IRT models using posterior predictive model checking.使用后验预测模型检查评估替代单维多项 IRT 模型的拟合情况。
Psychol Methods. 2017 Jun;22(2):397-408. doi: 10.1037/met0000082. Epub 2016 May 30.
6
Examining Parameter Invariance in a General Diagnostic Classification Model.检验一般诊断分类模型中的参数不变性。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 13;10:2930. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02930. eCollection 2019.
7
A Constrained Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro Algorithm for Q Matrix Estimation in DINA Models.一种用于 DINA 模型中 Q 矩阵估计的受限 metropolis-hastings robbins-monro 算法。
Psychometrika. 2020 Jun;85(2):322-357. doi: 10.1007/s11336-020-09707-4. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
8
Estimating the DINA model parameters using the No-U-Turn Sampler.使用无回转采样器估计DINA模型参数。
Biom J. 2018 Mar;60(2):352-368. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201600225. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
9
DINA Models for Multiple-Choice Items With Few Parameters: Considering Incorrect Answers.参数较少的多项选择题的DINA模型:考虑错误答案
Appl Psychol Meas. 2015 Sep;39(6):431-447. doi: 10.1177/0146621615574693. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
10
Evaluating the Fit of Sequential G-DINA Model Using Limited-Information Measures.使用有限信息测度评估序列G-DINA模型的拟合度。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2020 May;44(3):167-181. doi: 10.1177/0146621619843829. Epub 2019 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of an assessment technique for basic science retention using the NBME subject exam data.利用 NBME 科目考试数据开发基础科学保留评估技术。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Nov 9;22(1):771. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03842-5.
2
Modified Item-Fit Indices for Dichotomous IRT Models with Missing Data.具有缺失数据的二分IRT模型的修正项目拟合指数
Appl Psychol Meas. 2022 Nov;46(8):705-719. doi: 10.1177/01466216221125176. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
3
Performance of the Statistic for the Multidimensional Graded Response Model.多维等级反应模型统计量的性能
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Jun;81(3):491-522. doi: 10.1177/0013164420958060. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
4
Evaluating the Fit of Sequential G-DINA Model Using Limited-Information Measures.使用有限信息测度评估序列G-DINA模型的拟合度。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2020 May;44(3):167-181. doi: 10.1177/0146621619843829. Epub 2019 May 14.
5
Assessing Item-Level Fit for Higher Order Item Response Theory Models.评估高阶项目反应理论模型的项目水平拟合度。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2018 Nov;42(8):644-659. doi: 10.1177/0146621618762740. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
6
Applying the Statistic to Evaluate the Fit of Diagnostic Classification Models in the Presence of Attribute Hierarchies.应用该统计量评估存在属性层次结构时诊断分类模型的拟合度。
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 9;9:1875. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01875. eCollection 2018.
7
Inferential Item-Fit Evaluation in Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling.认知诊断建模中的推断性项目拟合评估
Appl Psychol Meas. 2017 Nov;41(8):614-631. doi: 10.1177/0146621617707510. Epub 2017 May 19.
8
Comparison of Relative Fit Indices for Diagnostic Model Selection.诊断模型选择的相对拟合指数比较。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2017 Sep;41(6):422-438. doi: 10.1177/0146621617695521. Epub 2017 Mar 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing Two Algorithms for Calibrating the Restricted Non-Compensatory Multidimensional IRT Model.比较两种用于校准受限非补偿多维IRT模型的算法。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2015 Mar;39(2):119-134. doi: 10.1177/0146621614545983. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
2
Efficient Models for Cognitive Diagnosis With Continuous and Mixed-Type Latent Variables.具有连续和混合型潜在变量的认知诊断高效模型。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2015 Jan;39(1):31-43. doi: 10.1177/0146621614524981. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
3
Goodness-of-Fit Testing for Latent Class Models.潜在类别模型的拟合优度检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1993 Jul 1;28(3):375-89. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2803_4.
4
Hierarchical diagnostic classification models: a family of models for estimating and testing attribute hierarchies.分层诊断分类模型:用于估计和检验属性层次结构的一类模型。
Psychometrika. 2014 Apr;79(2):317-39. doi: 10.1007/s11336-013-9362-0. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
5
Data-Driven Learning of Q-Matrix.基于数据驱动的Q矩阵学习
Appl Psychol Meas. 2012 Oct;36(7):548-564. doi: 10.1177/0146621612456591.
6
Bayesian structural equation modeling: a more flexible representation of substantive theory.贝叶斯结构方程建模:对实质性理论更灵活的表述。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Sep;17(3):313-35. doi: 10.1037/a0026802.
7
A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data.应用于语言测试数据的通用诊断模型。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2008 Nov;61(Pt 2):287-307. doi: 10.1348/000711007X193957. Epub 2007 Mar 22.

评估DINA模型的项目水平拟合度。

Assessing Item-Level Fit for the DINA Model.

作者信息

Wang Chun, Shu Zhan, Shang Zhuoran, Xu Gongjun

机构信息

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.

Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Appl Psychol Meas. 2015 Oct;39(7):525-538. doi: 10.1177/0146621615583050. Epub 2015 May 5.

DOI:10.1177/0146621615583050
PMID:29881024
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5978514/
Abstract

This research focuses on developing item-level fit checking procedures in the context of diagnostic classification models (DCMs), and more specifically for the "Deterministic Input; Noisy 'And' gate" (DINA) model. Although there is a growing body of literature discussing model fit checking methods for DCM, the item-level fit analysis is not adequately discussed in literature. This study intends to take an initiative to fill in this gap. Two approaches are proposed, one stems from classical goodness-of-fit test statistics coupled with the Expectation-Maximization algorithm for model estimation, and the other is the posterior predictive model checking (PPMC) method coupled with the Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation. For both approaches, the chi-square statistic and a power-divergence index are considered, along with Stone's method for considering uncertainty in latent attribute estimation. A simulation study with varying manipulated factors is carried out. Results show that both approaches are promising if Stone's method is imposed, but the classical goodness-of-fit approach has a much higher detection rate (i.e., proportion of misfit items that are correctly detected) than the PPMC method.

摘要

本研究聚焦于在诊断分类模型(DCM)的背景下开发项目级拟合检验程序,更具体地说是针对“确定性输入;噪声‘与’门”(DINA)模型。尽管有越来越多的文献讨论DCM的模型拟合检验方法,但项目级拟合分析在文献中并未得到充分讨论。本研究旨在主动填补这一空白。提出了两种方法,一种源于经典的拟合优度检验统计量并结合期望最大化算法进行模型估计,另一种是后验预测模型检验(PPMC)方法并结合马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗估计。对于这两种方法,均考虑了卡方统计量和幂散度指数,以及用于考虑潜在属性估计中不确定性的斯通方法。进行了一项具有不同操纵因素的模拟研究。结果表明,如果采用斯通方法,两种方法都很有前景,但经典的拟合优度方法比PPMC方法具有更高的检测率(即被正确检测出的不拟合项目的比例)。