Wang Chun, Shu Zhan, Shang Zhuoran, Xu Gongjun
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Appl Psychol Meas. 2015 Oct;39(7):525-538. doi: 10.1177/0146621615583050. Epub 2015 May 5.
This research focuses on developing item-level fit checking procedures in the context of diagnostic classification models (DCMs), and more specifically for the "Deterministic Input; Noisy 'And' gate" (DINA) model. Although there is a growing body of literature discussing model fit checking methods for DCM, the item-level fit analysis is not adequately discussed in literature. This study intends to take an initiative to fill in this gap. Two approaches are proposed, one stems from classical goodness-of-fit test statistics coupled with the Expectation-Maximization algorithm for model estimation, and the other is the posterior predictive model checking (PPMC) method coupled with the Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation. For both approaches, the chi-square statistic and a power-divergence index are considered, along with Stone's method for considering uncertainty in latent attribute estimation. A simulation study with varying manipulated factors is carried out. Results show that both approaches are promising if Stone's method is imposed, but the classical goodness-of-fit approach has a much higher detection rate (i.e., proportion of misfit items that are correctly detected) than the PPMC method.
本研究聚焦于在诊断分类模型(DCM)的背景下开发项目级拟合检验程序,更具体地说是针对“确定性输入;噪声‘与’门”(DINA)模型。尽管有越来越多的文献讨论DCM的模型拟合检验方法,但项目级拟合分析在文献中并未得到充分讨论。本研究旨在主动填补这一空白。提出了两种方法,一种源于经典的拟合优度检验统计量并结合期望最大化算法进行模型估计,另一种是后验预测模型检验(PPMC)方法并结合马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗估计。对于这两种方法,均考虑了卡方统计量和幂散度指数,以及用于考虑潜在属性估计中不确定性的斯通方法。进行了一项具有不同操纵因素的模拟研究。结果表明,如果采用斯通方法,两种方法都很有前景,但经典的拟合优度方法比PPMC方法具有更高的检测率(即被正确检测出的不拟合项目的比例)。