• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

推进支持家庭照顾者政策的策略有哪些?来自一个全州特别工作组的可行方法。

What Are Strategies to Advance Policies Supporting Family Caregivers? Promising Approaches From a Statewide Task Force.

作者信息

Meyer Kylie, Rath Laura, Gassoumis Zach, Kaiser Natalie, Wilber Kathleen

机构信息

a Leonard Davis School of Gerontology , University of Southern California , Los Angeles , California , USA.

出版信息

J Aging Soc Policy. 2018 Jun 8:1-19. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1485395.

DOI:10.1080/08959420.2018.1485395
PMID:29883273
Abstract

Family caregivers are the cornerstone of the long-term supports and services infrastructure in the United States, yet they often contend with many challenges related to this role. Public policy has been slow to change, leaving many caregivers vulnerable to health and economic consequences. Using models of policy making, we identify barriers to advancing policies that support family caregivers and overcome policy drift. We draw on discussions from the California Task Force on Family Caregiving as it prepares state policy recommendations. Identified strategies include identification of caregivers in health care and workplace settings to promote political consciousness raising, collecting and reporting on data that frame caregiving as a policy problem, borrowing policies and language from overlapping fields to emulate their policy successes, and presenting supportive caregiver policies as solutions to other policy problems. By presenting specific strategic approaches to advance caregiving policies, we provide tools to address the growing gap between caregiver needs and policy responses.

摘要

家庭照顾者是美国长期支持与服务体系的基石,但他们在履行这一角色时常常面临诸多挑战。公共政策的变革进展缓慢,致使许多照顾者容易受到健康和经济方面后果的影响。我们运用政策制定模型,找出推进支持家庭照顾者政策的障碍,并克服政策漂移现象。我们借鉴了加利福尼亚家庭照顾特别工作组在制定州政策建议过程中的讨论内容。确定的策略包括在医疗保健和工作场所识别照顾者,以提高政治意识;收集并报告将照顾问题界定为政策问题的数据;借鉴重叠领域的政策和措辞,效仿其政策成功经验;将支持照顾者的政策作为解决其他政策问题的方案提出。通过提出推进照顾政策的具体战略方法,我们提供了工具来弥合照顾者需求与政策回应之间日益扩大的差距。

相似文献

1
What Are Strategies to Advance Policies Supporting Family Caregivers? Promising Approaches From a Statewide Task Force.推进支持家庭照顾者政策的策略有哪些?来自一个全州特别工作组的可行方法。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2018 Jun 8:1-19. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1485395.
2
The State of Family Caregiving Policy.家庭护理政策状况
J Aging Soc Policy. 2024 Jul 3;36(4):479-489. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2024.2339177. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
3
Categorizing national caregiver recommendations to support family caregivers and address unmet needs.对国家护理员建议进行分类,以支持家庭护理员并满足未满足的需求。
Nurs Outlook. 2022 Nov-Dec;70(6):837-845. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2022.07.013. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
4
The Landscape of State Policies Supporting Family Caregivers as Aligned With the National Academy of Medicine Recommendations.支持家庭护老者的国家政策格局与国家医学科学院建议保持一致。
Milbank Q. 2022 Sep;100(3):854-878. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12567. Epub 2022 May 17.
5
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
6
Caregiver supportive policies to improve child outcomes in the wake of the HIV/AIDS epidemic: an analysis of the gap between what is needed and what is available in 25 high prevalence countries.在艾滋病流行之后改善儿童状况的照料者支持政策:对25个高流行率国家需求与现有情况之间差距的分析
AIDS Care. 2016 Mar;28 Suppl 2(sup2):142-52. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1176685.
7
Informal Caregiving and the Politics of Policy Drift in the United States.美国的非正式照料与政策漂移政治
J Aging Soc Policy. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(5):413-432. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2017.1280748. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
8
When the private sphere goes public: exploring the issues facing family caregiver organizations in the development of long-term care policies.当私人领域走向公共领域:探讨家庭护理组织在长期护理政策制定过程中面临的问题。
Soc Work Public Health. 2008;23(4):49-68. doi: 10.1080/19371910802162207.
9
The health and well-being of caregivers of children with cerebral palsy.脑瘫患儿照料者的健康与幸福。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):e626-36. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1689.
10
Policies to Sustain Employment Among Family Caregivers: The Family Caregiver Perspective.维持家庭照顾者就业的政策:家庭照顾者的视角
J Appl Gerontol. 2023 Jan;42(1):3-11. doi: 10.1177/07334648221125635. Epub 2022 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Balance and preference in activity participation for informal caregivers of people with aphasia: A questionnaire study.失语症患者非正式照护者活动参与的平衡与偏好:一项问卷调查研究。
Aphasiology. 2020;34(9):1182-1200. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2019.1659936. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
2
International Comparison of Social Support Policies on Long-Term Care in Workplaces in Aging Societies.老龄化社会中工作场所长期护理社会支持政策的国际比较
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 10;19(6):3284. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063284.
3
The Differential Effects of Caregiving Intensity on Overnight Hospitalization.
照顾强度对 overnight hospitalization 的差异影响。
West J Nurs Res. 2022 Jun;44(6):528-539. doi: 10.1177/01939459211002907. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
4
Educational Attainment Differences in Attitudes toward Provisions of IADL Care for Older Adults in the U.S.美国老年人对日常生活活动能力(IADL)护理服务态度上的教育程度差异
J Aging Soc Policy. 2022 Nov 2;34(6):903-922. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2020.1722898. Epub 2020 Feb 1.