• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型皮肤清洁剂配方与葡萄糖酸洗必泰的疗效和安全性比较。

Efficacy and safety of a novel skin cleansing formulation versus chlorhexidine gluconate.

机构信息

BioScience Laboratories, Inc, Bozeman, MT.

Hahn School of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2018 Nov;46(11):1262-1265. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.04.232. Epub 2018 Jun 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2018.04.232
PMID:29884580
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated whether a multi-ingredient surfactant colloidal silver technology was noninferior to a 4% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) antiseptic on immediate and persistent antimicrobial activity.

METHODS

The inguinal regions of 81 healthy adults were demarcated into 4 quadrants, and 3 were used for testing each product at baseline, 10 minutes, and 6 hours postapplication. The log of the number of colony forming units was obtained using a cylinder sampling technique. The 95% confidence interval of the test product to the control product with a margin of 0.65 was established as the upper limit of noninferiority.

RESULTS

A total of 81 individuals were enrolled. The colloidal silver product was found to be noninferior to 4% CHG at both 10 minutes and 6 hours postapplication.

CONCLUSIONS

The colloidal silver-based product was noninferior to the 4% CHG product at 10 minutes and 6 hours postapplication.

摘要

背景

本研究评估了一种多成分表面活性剂胶体银技术在即刻和持久抗菌活性方面是否不劣于 4%葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHG)消毒剂。

方法

81 名健康成年人的腹股沟区域被划分为 4 个象限,每个产品在基线、10 分钟和 6 小时后应用于 3 个象限进行测试。使用圆柱采样技术获得菌落形成单位数量的对数。测试产品与控制产品的 95%置信区间,以 0.65 的差值为非劣效性的上限。

结果

共有 81 名个体入组。胶体银产品在应用后 10 分钟和 6 小时均显示不劣于 4%CHG。

结论

胶体银产品在应用后 10 分钟和 6 小时与 4%CHG 产品相比不劣效。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of a novel skin cleansing formulation versus chlorhexidine gluconate.新型皮肤清洁剂配方与葡萄糖酸洗必泰的疗效和安全性比较。
Am J Infect Control. 2018 Nov;46(11):1262-1265. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.04.232. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
2
A clinical study comparing the skin antisepsis and safety of ChloraPrep, 70% isopropyl alcohol, and 2% aqueous chlorhexidine.一项比较氯己定醇(ChloraPrep)、70%异丙醇和2%氯己定水溶液的皮肤消毒效果及安全性的临床研究。
J Infus Nurs. 2002 Jul-Aug;25(4):244-9. doi: 10.1097/00129804-200207000-00007.
3
Comparative of a new and innovative 2% chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated cloth with 4% chlorhexidine gluconate as topical antiseptic for preparation of the skin prior to surgery.新型创新型2%葡萄糖酸氯己定浸渍布与4%葡萄糖酸氯己定作为术前皮肤准备局部防腐剂的比较。
Am J Infect Control. 2007 Mar;35(2):89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.06.012.
4
Methods for evaluating changes in skin condition due to the effects of antimicrobial hand cleansers: two studies comparing a new waterless chlorhexidine gluconate/ethanol-emollient antiseptic preparation with a conventional water-applied product.评估抗菌洗手液作用导致皮肤状况变化的方法:两项将新型无水葡萄糖酸氯己定/乙醇润肤抗菌制剂与传统水性产品进行比较的研究。
Am J Infect Control. 2001 Dec;29(6):361-9. doi: 10.1067/mic.2001.118619.
5
Relationship between chlorhexidine gluconate skin concentration and microbial density on the skin of critically ill patients bathed daily with chlorhexidine gluconate.洗必泰葡萄糖酸皮肤浓度与重症患者每日用洗必泰葡萄糖酸沐浴后皮肤微生物密度的关系。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012 Sep;33(9):889-96. doi: 10.1086/667371. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
6
Evaluation of a waterless, scrubless chlorhexidine gluconate/ethanol surgical scrub for antimicrobial efficacy.对一种无水、免刷的葡萄糖酸洗必泰/乙醇手术 scrub 进行抗菌效果评估。
Am J Infect Control. 2001 Dec;29(6):377-82. doi: 10.1067/mic.2001.118842.
7
Safety of chlorhexidine gluconate used for skin antisepsis in the preterm infant.氯己定葡萄糖酸盐用于早产儿皮肤消毒的安全性。
J Perinatol. 2012 Jan;32(1):4-9. doi: 10.1038/jp.2011.148. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
8
Efficacy and dermal tolerance of a novel alcohol-based skin antiseptic in horses.一种新型酒精基皮肤消毒剂对马的有效性和皮肤耐受性
Vet Surg. 2018 May;47(4):572-577. doi: 10.1111/vsu.12793. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
9
Neonatal skin and chlorhexidine: a burning experience.新生儿皮肤与洗必泰:一次惨痛经历。
Neonatal Netw. 2014 Jan-Feb;33(1):19-23. doi: 10.1891/0730-0832.33.1.19.
10
Differential Effects of Chlorhexidine Skin Cleansing Methods on Residual Chlorhexidine Skin Concentrations and Bacterial Recovery.不同洗必泰皮肤清洁方法对残余洗必泰皮肤浓度和细菌回收的影响差异。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Apr;39(4):405-411. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.312. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
A Porcine Model for the Development and Testing of Preoperative Skin Preparations.一种用于术前皮肤准备制剂研发与测试的猪模型。
Microorganisms. 2022 Apr 19;10(5):837. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10050837.
2
Cytotoxicity and Epidermal Barrier Function Evaluation of Common Antiseptics for Clinical Use in an Artificial Autologous Skin Model.在人工自体皮肤模型中对临床常用防腐剂的细胞毒性和表皮屏障功能评估
J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 8;10(4):642. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040642.
3
Effectiveness of Bath Wipes After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Randomized Trial.
造血细胞移植后使用沐浴湿巾的效果:一项随机试验。
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2020 Nov/Dec;37(6):390-397. doi: 10.1177/1043454220944061. Epub 2020 Jul 24.