• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

3.0特斯拉扩散张量成像参数能否成为乳腺癌的预后指标?

Can 3.0 Tesla diffusion tensor Imaging parameters be prognostic indicators in breast cancer?

作者信息

Ozal Safiye Tokgoz, Inci Ercan, Gemici Aysegul Akdogan, Turgut Hurriyet, Cikot Murat, Karabulut Mehmet

机构信息

Radiology Department, Medical Sciences University, Istanbul Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey.

Radiology Department, Medical Sciences University, Istanbul Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Clin Imaging. 2018 Sep-Oct;51:240-247. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.03.022. Epub 2018 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.03.022
PMID:29886409
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters such as fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), relative anisotropy (RA), and volume ratio (VR) values, and prognostic factors of invasive breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study examined 63 patients with pathologically confirmed invasive breast cancers. The patients underwent pre-operative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3.0 Tesla. The relationship between DTI parameters and tumor size, histologic and nuclear grade, axillary lymph node status, lymphovascular and perineural invasion status, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), CERB-B2, and Ki-67 were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients with lymph node metastasis (p = 0.018; p < 0.05) and/or lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.001; p < 0.01) and/or histologic grade 3 tumors (p < 0.05) had statistically significantly low MD values. There was a statistically significant relationship between ER and MD (r = 0.452, p < 0.01), PR and MD (p = 0.001, p < 0.01); CERB-B2 and RA (p = 0.047, p < 0.05); Ki-67 and RA (p = 0.026; p < 0.05); Ki-67 and VR (p = 0.021; p < 0.05); and lymphovascular invasion and FA (p = 0.045, p < 0.05) values.

CONCLUSION

DTI parameters of malignant masses in breast cancer patients correlate with tumor size, lymph node status, histologic grade, lymphovascular invasion, Ki-67, CERB B2, ER, and PR.

摘要

目的

探讨扩散张量成像(DTI)参数,如分数各向异性(FA)、平均扩散率(MD)、相对各向异性(RA)和体积比(VR)值,与浸润性乳腺癌预后因素之间的关系。

材料与方法

本回顾性研究纳入了63例经病理证实的浸润性乳腺癌患者。患者在3.0特斯拉下接受术前扩散加权磁共振成像(MRI)检查。分析了DTI参数与肿瘤大小、组织学和核分级、腋窝淋巴结状态、淋巴管和神经周围侵犯状态、雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)、CERB-B2和Ki-67之间的关系。

结果

有淋巴结转移(p = 0.018;p < 0.05)和/或淋巴管侵犯(p = 0.001;p < 0.01)和/或组织学3级肿瘤(p < 0.05)的患者MD值在统计学上显著降低。ER与MD(r = 0.452,p < 0.01)、PR与MD(p = 0.001,p < 0.01);CERB-B2与RA(p = 0.047,p < 0.05);Ki-67与RA(p = 0.026;p < 0.05);Ki-67与VR(p = 0.021;p < 0.05);以及淋巴管侵犯与FA(p = 0.045,p < 0.05)值之间存在统计学上的显著关系。

结论

乳腺癌患者恶性肿块的DTI参数与肿瘤大小、淋巴结状态、组织学分级、淋巴管侵犯、Ki-67、CERB B2、ER和PR相关。

相似文献

1
Can 3.0 Tesla diffusion tensor Imaging parameters be prognostic indicators in breast cancer?3.0特斯拉扩散张量成像参数能否成为乳腺癌的预后指标?
Clin Imaging. 2018 Sep-Oct;51:240-247. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.03.022. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
2
Diagnostic performance of diffusion tensor imaging parameters in breast cancer and correlation with the prognostic factors.扩散张量成像参数在乳腺癌中的诊断效能及其与预后因素的相关性
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Mar;45(3):660-672. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25481. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
3
Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer: associations between diffusion metrics and histological prognostic factors.乳腺癌的弥散张量磁共振成像:弥散指标与组织学预后因素的相关性。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Aug;28(8):3185-3193. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5429-8. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
4
Correlation of the SUVmax of FDG-PET and ADC values of diffusion-weighted MR imaging with pathologic prognostic factors in breast carcinoma.乳腺癌中FDG-PET的SUVmax及扩散加权磁共振成像的ADC值与病理预后因素的相关性
Eur J Radiol. 2016 May;85(5):943-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.02.015. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
5
Dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI of estrogen receptor-positive invasive breast cancers: Associations between quantitative MR parameters and Ki-67 proliferation status.雌激素受体阳性浸润性乳腺癌的动态对比增强和扩散加权磁共振成像:磁共振定量参数与Ki-67增殖状态之间的关联。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Jan;45(1):94-102. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25348. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
6
Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient measurement obtained by 3.0Tesla MRI as a potential noninvasive marker of tumor aggressiveness in breast cancer.通过3.0特斯拉磁共振成像获得的定量表观扩散系数测量作为乳腺癌肿瘤侵袭性的潜在无创标志物。
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Sep;85(9):1651-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.06.019. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
7
Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion Tensor Imaging with Readout-segmented Echo-planar Imaging for Invasive Breast Cancer: Correlation of ADC and FA with Pathological Prognostic Markers.读出分段回波平面成像的扩散张量成像对浸润性乳腺癌的诊断性能:表观扩散系数(ADC)和各向异性分数(FA)与病理预后标志物的相关性
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2017 Jul 10;16(3):245-252. doi: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2016-0037. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
8
Peritumor to tumor apparent diffusion coefficient ratio is associated with biologically more aggressive breast cancer features and correlates with the prognostication tools.肿瘤周围至肿瘤表观扩散系数比值与生物学侵袭性更强的乳腺癌特征相关,并与预后评估工具相关。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 25;15(6):e0235278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235278. eCollection 2020.
9
Usefulness of 18F-FDG uptake with clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical prognostic factors in breast cancer.乳腺癌中 18F-FDG 摄取与临床病理及免疫组化预后因素的相关性。
Ann Nucl Med. 2012 Feb;26(2):175-83. doi: 10.1007/s12149-011-0556-1. Epub 2011 Dec 3.
10
[Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient in diffusion?weighted magnetic resonance imaging and molecular subtypes of invasive breast cancer masses].[扩散加权磁共振成像中表观扩散系数与浸润性乳腺癌肿块分子亚型的相关性]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2017 Oct 20;37(10):1410-1414. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4254.2017.10.22.

引用本文的文献

1
Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Characterizing Changes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer During Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.扩散张量成像在三阴性乳腺癌新辅助全身治疗期间评估变化的特征。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Oct;60(4):1367-1376. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29267. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
2
Clinical utility of abbreviated breast MRI based on diffusion tensor imaging in patients underwent breast conservative therapy.基于扩散张量成像的简化乳腺MRI在接受保乳治疗患者中的临床应用
Radiol Med. 2023 Mar;128(3):289-298. doi: 10.1007/s11547-023-01600-1. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
3
Diffusion Breast MRI: Current Standard and Emerging Techniques.
扩散加权乳腺磁共振成像:当前标准与新兴技术
Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 8;12:844790. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.844790. eCollection 2022.
4
Breast Cancer Subtypes and Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systemic Review.乳腺癌亚型与定量磁共振成像:一项系统综述
Life (Basel). 2022 Mar 28;12(4):490. doi: 10.3390/life12040490.
5
Current and Emerging Magnetic Resonance-Based Techniques for Breast Cancer.用于乳腺癌的当前及新兴的基于磁共振成像的技术
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 May 12;7:175. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00175. eCollection 2020.