Suppr超能文献

谁会预约非工作时间的全科医生门诊?使用新的非工作时间门诊的患者队列分析。

Who attends out-of-hours general practice appointments? Analysis of a patient cohort accessing new out-of-hours units.

机构信息

Department of Social Work, Social Care and Community Studies, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.

Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 9;8(6):e020308. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020308.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This report describes the patients who used additional out-of-hours (OOH) appointments offered through a UK scheme intended to increase patient access to primary care by extending OOH provision.

DESIGN

Cohort study and survey data.

SETTING

OOH appointments offered in four units in one region in England (October 2015 to November 2016).

METHODS

Unidentifiable data on all patients were abstracted from a bespoke appointment system and the responses to a patient opinion questionnaire about this service. Descriptive analysis of the appointment data was conducted. Multivariate analysis of the opinion survey data examined the characteristics of the patients who would have gone to the emergency department (ED) had the OOH appointments not been available.

RESULTS

There were 24 448 appointments for 19 701 different patients resulting in 29 629 service outcomes. Women dominated the uptake and patients from the poorest fifth of the population used nearly 40% of appointments. The patient survey found OOH appointments were extremely popular-93% selecting 'extremely likely' or 'likely' to recommend the service. Multivariate analysis of patient opinion survey data on whether ED would have been an alternative to the OOH service found that men, young children, people of Asian heritage and the most deprived were more likely to have gone to ED without this service.

CONCLUSIONS

The users of the OOH service were substantially different from in-hours service users with a large proportion of children under age 5, and the poor, which support the idea that there may be unmet need as the poor have the least flexible working conditions. These results demonstrate the need for equality impact assessment in planning service improvements associated with policy implementation. It suggests that OOH need to take account of patients expectations about convenience of appointments and how patients use services for urgent care needs.

摘要

目的

本报告描述了通过英国计划提供的额外非工作时间(OOH)预约的患者,该计划旨在通过延长 OOH 服务来增加患者获得初级保健的机会。

设计

队列研究和调查数据。

设置

英格兰一个地区的四个单位提供的 OOH 预约(2015 年 10 月至 2016 年 11 月)。

方法

从一个定制的预约系统中提取所有患者的不可识别数据,以及对该服务的患者意见调查问卷的回应。对预约数据进行描述性分析。对意见调查数据的多变量分析研究了如果没有 OOH 预约,那些会去急诊部(ED)的患者的特征。

结果

有 24448 次预约,涉及 19701 名不同的患者,共产生 29629 项服务结果。女性占据主导地位,来自最贫困的五分之一人口的患者使用了近 40%的预约。患者调查发现 OOH 预约非常受欢迎-93%的人选择“非常可能”或“可能”推荐该服务。对关于 ED 是否会成为 OOH 服务替代方案的患者意见调查数据的多变量分析发现,男性、幼儿、亚洲裔和最贫困的人如果没有这项服务,更有可能去 ED。

结论

OOH 服务的使用者与正常工作时间的服务使用者有很大的不同,其中包括大量 5 岁以下的儿童和贫困人口,这支持了这样一种观点,即可能存在未满足的需求,因为贫困人口的工作条件最不灵活。这些结果表明,在规划与政策实施相关的服务改进时,需要进行平等影响评估。这表明 OOH 需要考虑患者对预约便利性的期望以及患者如何将服务用于紧急护理需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11a3/6009516/502c4c240a69/bmjopen-2017-020308f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验