State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resources Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.
National Center for Chronic and Noncommunicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100050, China.
Environ Health. 2018 Jun 11;17(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12940-018-0398-6.
Many studies have reported an increased mortality risk from heat waves comparing with non-heat wave days. However, how much the mortality rate change with the heat intensity-vulnerability curve-is still unknown. Such unknown information makes the related managers impossible to assess scientifically life losses from heat waves, consequently fail in conducting suitable integrated risk management measures.
We used the heat wave intensity index (HWII) to characterize quantitatively the heat waves, then applied a distributed lag non-linear model to explore the area-specific definition of heat wave, and developed the vulnerability models on the relationships between HWII and mortality by age and by area. Finally, Monte Carlo method was run to assess and compare the event-based probabilistic heat wave risk during the periods of 1971-2015 and 2051-2095.
We found a localized definition of heat wave for each corresponding area based on the minimum AIC (Akaike information criterion). Under the local heat wave events, the expected life loss during 1971-2015 does distinguish across areas, and decreases consistently in the order of WZ Chongqing, PK Nanjing and YX Guangzhou for each age group. More specifically, for the elders (≥65), the average annual loss (AAL) (and 95% confidence interval) would be 61.3 (30.6-91.9), 38 (3.8-72.2) and 18.7 (7.3-30) deaths per million people. With two stresses from warming and aging in future China, the predicted average AAL of the elders under four Representative Carbon Pathways (2.6, 4.5, 6.0, and 8.5) during 2051-2095 would be 2460, 1675, 465 deaths per million for PK Nanjing, YX Guangzhou and WZ Chongqing, respectively, approximately becoming 8~ 90 times of the AAL during 1971-2015.
This study found that the non-linear HWII-mortality relationships vary by age and area. The heat wave mortality losses are closely associated with the social-economic level. With the increasing extreme climatic events and a rapid aging trend in China, our findings can provide guidance for policy-makers to take appropriate regional adaptive measures to reduce health risks in China.
许多研究报告称,与非热浪日相比,热浪会导致死亡率升高。然而,死亡率随热强度-脆弱性曲线变化的幅度仍不得而知。这些未知信息使得相关管理者无法科学地评估热浪造成的生命损失,因此无法采取适当的综合风险管理措施。
我们使用热浪强度指数(HWII)对热浪进行定量描述,然后应用分布滞后非线性模型来探索特定区域的热浪定义,并根据年龄和区域开发 HWII 与死亡率之间的脆弱性模型。最后,通过蒙特卡罗方法评估和比较 1971-2015 年和 2051-2095 年期间基于事件的概率热浪风险。
我们根据最小 AIC(Akaike 信息准则)为每个相应区域找到了本地化的热浪定义。在局部热浪事件下,1971-2015 年期间的预期生命损失在各区域之间存在差异,且各年龄组的损失顺序依次为 WZ 重庆、PK 南京和 YX 广州。更具体地说,对于老年人(≥65 岁),平均每年损失(AAL)(置信区间为 95%)分别为 61.3(30.6-91.9)、38(3.8-72.2)和 18.7(7.3-30)人/百万人。在中国未来面临的气候变暖与人口老龄化的双重压力下,四种代表性排放路径(2.6、4.5、6.0 和 8.5)下未来 2051-2095 年老年人的预测平均 AAL 将分别为 PK 南京、YX 广州和 WZ 重庆的 2460、1675、465 人/百万人,大约是 1971-2015 年期间 AAL 的 8~90 倍。
本研究发现,非线性 HWII-死亡率关系因年龄和区域而异。热浪死亡率损失与社会经济水平密切相关。随着中国极端气候事件的增加和人口老龄化趋势的加快,我们的研究结果可为决策者提供指导,以采取适当的区域适应措施,降低中国的健康风险。