• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正电子发射断层扫描(PET)纹理特征稳定性及其在放射组学分析中的模式判别能力:一项“特定”的体模研究。

PET textural features stability and pattern discrimination power for radiomics analysis: An "ad-hoc" phantoms study.

机构信息

Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.

Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Phys Med. 2018 Jun;50:66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.05.024. Epub 2018 May 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.05.024
PMID:29891096
Abstract

PURPOSE

The analysis of PET images by textural features, also known as radiomics, shows promising results in tumor characterization. However, radiomic metrics (RMs) analysis is currently not standardized and the impact of the whole processing chain still needs deep investigation. We characterized the impact on RM values of: i) two discretization methods, ii) acquisition statistics, and iii) reconstruction algorithm. The influence of tumor volume and standardized-uptake-value (SUV) on RM was also investigated.

METHODS

The Chang-Gung-Image-Texture-Analysis (CGITA) software was used to calculate 39 RMs using phantom data. Thirty noise realizations were acquired to measure statistical effect size indicators for each RM. The parameter η (fraction of variance explained by the nuisance factor) was used to assess the effect of categorical variables, considering η < 20% and 20% < η < 40% as representative of a "negligible" and a "small" dependence respectively. The Cohen's d was used as discriminatory power to quantify the separation of two distributions.

RESULTS

We found the discretization method based on fixed-bin-number (FBN) to outperform the one based on fixed-bin-size in units of SUV (FBS), as the latter shows a higher SUV dependence, with 30 RMs showing η > 20%. FBN was also less influenced by the acquisition and reconstruction setup:with FBN 37 RMs had η < 40%, only 20 with FBS. Most RMs showed a good discriminatory power among heterogeneous PET signals (for FBN: 29 out of 39 RMs with d > 3).

CONCLUSIONS

For RMs analysis, FBN should be preferred. A group of 21 RMs was suggested for PET radiomics analysis.

摘要

目的

通过纹理特征(也称为放射组学)对 PET 图像进行分析,在肿瘤特征描述方面显示出良好的效果。然而,放射组学指标(RMs)分析目前尚未标准化,整个处理链的影响仍需要深入研究。我们对以下因素对 RM 值的影响进行了特征描述:i)两种离散化方法,ii)采集统计信息,以及 iii)重建算法。还研究了肿瘤体积和标准化摄取值(SUV)对 RM 的影响。

方法

使用 Phantom 数据,使用 Chang-Gung-Image-Texture-Analysis(CGITA)软件计算 39 个 RM。对每种 RM 测量了 30 个噪声实现的统计效应大小指标。参数η(由杂项因素解释的方差分数)用于评估分类变量的影响,考虑η<20%和 20%<η<40%分别代表“可忽略”和“较小”的依赖性。Cohen's d 用于量化两个分布的分离度,作为判别力的量化指标。

结果

我们发现基于固定-bin-number(FBN)的离散化方法优于基于 SUV 单位固定-bin-size(FBS)的方法,因为后者显示出更高的 SUV 依赖性,其中 30 个 RM 的η值大于 20%。FBN 还受到采集和重建设置的影响较小:使用 FBN 时,37 个 RM 的η值小于 40%,而使用 FBS 时只有 20 个。大多数 RM 在异质 PET 信号中显示出良好的区分能力(对于 FBN:39 个 RM 中有 29 个 d 值大于 3)。

结论

对于 RMs 分析,应优先选择 FBN。建议使用一组 21 个 RM 进行 PET 放射组学分析。

相似文献

1
PET textural features stability and pattern discrimination power for radiomics analysis: An "ad-hoc" phantoms study.正电子发射断层扫描(PET)纹理特征稳定性及其在放射组学分析中的模式判别能力:一项“特定”的体模研究。
Phys Med. 2018 Jun;50:66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.05.024. Epub 2018 May 30.
2
Impact of acquisition count statistics reduction and SUV discretization on PET radiomic features in pediatric 18F-FDG-PET/MRI examinations. acquisitions 计数统计减少和 SUV 离散化对儿科 18F-FDG-PET/MRI 检查中 PET 放射组学特征的影响。
Phys Med. 2019 Mar;59:117-126. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
3
Robustness of [F]FDG PET/CT radiomic analysis in the setting of drug-induced cardiotoxicity.药物性心脏毒性中 [F]FDG PET/CT 影像组学分析的稳健性。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2024 Feb;244:107981. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107981. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
4
Reproducibility of F18-FDG PET radiomic features for different cervical tumor segmentation methods, gray-level discretization, and reconstruction algorithms.不同宫颈肿瘤分割方法、灰度离散化及重建算法下F18-FDG PET影像组学特征的可重复性
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Nov;18(6):32-48. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12170. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
5
Prognostic value of different discretization parameters in fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography radiomics of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.口咽鳞状细胞癌氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描影像组学中不同离散化参数的预后价值
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2024 Mar;11(2):024007. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.11.2.024007. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
6
Quantitative radiomics: Validating image textural features for oncological PET in lung cancer.定量放射组学:验证肺癌肿瘤 PET 成像纹理特征。
Radiother Oncol. 2018 Nov;129(2):209-217. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
7
Experimental Multicenter and Multivendor Evaluation of the Performance of PET Radiomic Features Using 3-Dimensionally Printed Phantom Inserts.使用三维打印的 phantom 插件进行 PET 放射组学特征的多中心、多供应商性能的实验评估。
J Nucl Med. 2020 Mar;61(3):469-476. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.229724. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
8
Optimized Feature Extraction for Radiomics Analysis of F-FDG PET Imaging.基于 F-FDG PET 成像的放射组学分析的特征优化提取。
J Nucl Med. 2019 Jun;60(6):864-872. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.217612. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
9
The effect of SUV discretization in quantitative FDG-PET Radiomics: the need for standardized methodology in tumor texture analysis.SUV离散化在定量FDG-PET影像组学中的作用:肿瘤纹理分析中标准化方法的必要性。
Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 5;5:11075. doi: 10.1038/srep11075.
10
Influence of gray level discretization on radiomic feature stability for different CT scanners, tube currents and slice thicknesses: a comprehensive phantom study.不同CT扫描仪、管电流和层厚下灰度离散化对影像组学特征稳定性的影响:一项全面的体模研究
Acta Oncol. 2017 Nov;56(11):1544-1553. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1351624. Epub 2017 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporal Validation of an FDG-PET-Radiomic Model for Distant-Relapse-Free-Survival After Radio-Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.胰腺癌放化疗后远处无复发生存的 FDG-PET 放射组学模型的时间验证
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 20;17(6):1036. doi: 10.3390/cancers17061036.
2
A heterogeneous phantom study for investigating the stability of PET images radiomic features with varying reconstruction settings.一项用于研究不同重建设置下PET图像放射组学特征稳定性的异质性体模研究。
Front Nucl Med. 2023 Feb 14;3:1078536. doi: 10.3389/fnume.2023.1078536. eCollection 2023.
3
Mitigating the impact of image processing variations on tumour [F]-FDG-PET radiomic feature robustness.
减轻图像处理变化对肿瘤 [F]-FDG-PET 放射组学特征稳健性的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 15;14(1):16294. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67239-8.
4
Respective contribution of baseline clinical data, tumour metabolism and tumour blood-flow in predicting pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2 and Triple Negative breast cancer.在HER2和三阴性乳腺癌新辅助化疗后预测病理完全缓解方面,基线临床数据、肿瘤代谢和肿瘤血流的各自贡献。
EJNMMI Res. 2024 Jul 4;14(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13550-024-01115-4.
5
External validation of an F-FDG-PET radiomic model predicting survival after radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer.预测口咽癌放疗后生存的F-FDG-PET放射组学模型的外部验证
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023 Apr;50(5):1329-1336. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-06098-9. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
6
Using domain knowledge for robust and generalizable deep learning-based CT-free PET attenuation and scatter correction.利用领域知识进行稳健且可推广的基于深度学习的 CT 自由 PET 衰减和散射校正。
Nat Commun. 2022 Oct 6;13(1):5882. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33562-9.
7
Positron Emission Tomography Radiopharmaceuticals in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.正电子发射断层扫描放射性药物在分化型甲状腺癌中的应用。
Molecules. 2022 Aug 3;27(15):4936. doi: 10.3390/molecules27154936.
8
A multi-modality physical phantom for mimicking tumor heterogeneity patterns in PET/CT and PET/MRI.一种用于模拟 PET/CT 和 PET/MRI 中肿瘤异质性模式的多模态体模。
Med Phys. 2022 Sep;49(9):5819-5829. doi: 10.1002/mp.15853. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
9
Beads phantom for evaluating heterogeneity of SUV on F-FDG PET images.用于评估 F-FDG PET 图像上 SUV 异质性的珠影。
Ann Nucl Med. 2022 May;36(5):495-503. doi: 10.1007/s12149-022-01740-w. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
10
Radiomics Analysis of [F]FDG PET/CT Thyroid Incidentalomas: How Can It Improve Patients' Clinical Management? A Systematic Review from the Literature.[F]FDG PET/CT甲状腺偶发瘤的影像组学分析:如何改善患者的临床管理?文献系统评价
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 12;12(2):471. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020471.