• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者与健康专业人员营养基因组学技术界面工具比较:一项混合方法研究方案

Comparison of Nutrigenomics Technology Interface Tools for Consumers and Health Professionals: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study.

作者信息

Littlejohn Paula, Cop Irene, Brown Erin, Afroze Rimi, Davison Karen M

机构信息

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Health Science, Department of Biology, Kwantlen Polytechnic University, Surrey, BC, Canada.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Jun 11;7(6):e115. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9846.

DOI:10.2196/resprot.9846
PMID:29891470
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6018240/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although nutrition interventions are a widely accepted resource for the prevention of long-term health conditions, current approaches have not adequately reduced chronic disease morbidity. Nutrigenomics has great potential; however, it is complicated to implement. There is a need for products based on nutrition-related gene test results that are easily understood, accessible, and used.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to compare a nonpractitioner-assisted direct-to-consumer self-driven approach to nutrigenomics versus an integrated and personalized practitioner-led method.

METHODS

This 4-month study used a mixed-methods design that included (1) a phase 1 randomized controlled trial that examined the effectiveness of a multifaceted, nutrition-based gene test (components assessed included major nutrients, food tolerances, food taste and preferences, and micronutrients) in changing health behaviors, followed by (2) a qualitative investigation that explored participants' experiences. The study recruited 55 healthy males and females (aged 35-55 years) randomized as a 2:1 ratio where 36 received the intervention (gene test results plus integrated and personalized nutrition report) and 19 were assigned to the control group (gene test results report emailed). The primary outcomes of interest measures included changes in diet (nutrients, healthy eating index), changes in measures on General Self-efficacy and Health-Related Quality of Life scales, and anthropometrics (body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio) measured at baseline, post intervention (3 and 6 weeks), and the final visit (week 9 post intervention).

RESULTS

Of the 478 individuals who expressed interest, 180 were invited (37.7%, 180/478) and completed the eligibility screening questionnaire; 73 of the 180 invited individuals (40.5%) were deemed eligible. Of the 73 individuals who were deemed to be eligible, 58 completed the baseline health questionnaire and food records (79%). Of these 58 individuals, 3 were excluded either because they did not complete all required data collection forms or were later found to be ineligible. The final sample (n=55) was mostly female (75%), married (85%), and those who had completed postsecondary education (62%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study will leverage quantitative and qualitative findings, which will guide the development of nutrigenomics-based products in electronic formats that are user-friendly for consumers and health professionals. Although the quantitative data have not been analyzed yet, the overwhelming interest in the study and the extremely high retention rate show that there is a great degree of interest in this field. Given this interest and the fact that nutrigenomics is an evolving science, a need for continued research exists to further the understanding of the role of genetic variation and its role and applications in nutrition practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03310814; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03310814 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6yGnU5deB).

REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER

RR1-10.2196/9846.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/128c/6018240/2fbb623c966f/resprot_v7i6e115_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/128c/6018240/2fbb623c966f/resprot_v7i6e115_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/128c/6018240/2fbb623c966f/resprot_v7i6e115_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

尽管营养干预是预防长期健康问题的一种广泛认可的手段,但目前的方法尚未充分降低慢性病的发病率。营养基因组学具有巨大潜力;然而,其实施过程较为复杂。需要基于营养相关基因检测结果开发易于理解、获取和使用的产品。

目的

本研究的主要目的是比较非从业者辅助的直接面向消费者的自我驱动型营养基因组学方法与综合且个性化的从业者主导方法。

方法

这项为期4个月的研究采用混合方法设计,包括:(1)一项1期随机对照试验,该试验检验了一种多方面的、基于营养的基因检测(评估的组成部分包括主要营养素、食物耐受性、食物口味和偏好以及微量营养素)在改变健康行为方面的有效性,随后是(2)一项定性调查,探究参与者的经历。该研究招募了55名健康男性和女性(年龄在35 - 55岁之间),按2:1的比例随机分组,其中36人接受干预(基因检测结果加上综合且个性化的营养报告),19人被分配到对照组(通过电子邮件发送基因检测结果报告)。主要关注的测量结果包括饮食变化(营养素、健康饮食指数)、一般自我效能感量表和健康相关生活质量量表上的测量指标变化,以及在基线、干预后(3周和6周)和最终访视(干预后第9周)测量的人体测量指标(体重指数、腰臀比)。

结果

在478名表示感兴趣的个体中,180人被邀请(37.7%,180/478)并完成了资格筛选问卷;180名被邀请个体中有73人(40.5%)被认为符合资格。在这73名被认为符合资格的个体中,58人完成了基线健康问卷和食物记录(79%)。在这58名个体中,3人被排除,要么是因为他们没有完成所有要求的数据收集表格,要么后来被发现不符合资格。最终样本(n = 55)大多为女性(75%)、已婚(85%)且完成了高等教育(62%)。

结论

本研究将利用定量和定性研究结果,这将指导以电子形式开发对消费者和健康专业人员都用户友好的基于营养基因组学的产品。尽管定量数据尚未进行分析,但该研究中极高的兴趣度和保留率表明该领域存在极大的关注度。鉴于这种兴趣以及营养基因组学是一门不断发展的科学,有必要继续开展研究以进一步了解基因变异在营养实践中的作用及其应用。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03310814;http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03310814(由WebCite存档于http://www.webcitation.org/6yGnU5deB)。

注册报告标识符

RR1 - 10.2196/9846。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Nutrigenomics Technology Interface Tools for Consumers and Health Professionals: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study.消费者与健康专业人员营养基因组学技术界面工具比较:一项混合方法研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Jun 11;7(6):e115. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9846.
2
Comparison of Nutrigenomics Technology Interface Tools for Consumers and Health Professionals: A Sequential Explanatory Mixed Methods Investigation.面向消费者和健康专业人员的营养基因组学技术界面工具比较:一项序列解释性混合方法调查
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 28;21(6):e12580. doi: 10.2196/12580.
3
Testing a Web-Based Interactive Comic Tool to Decrease Obesity Risk Among Minority Preadolescents: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Control Trial.测试基于网络的交互式漫画工具以降低少数民族青春期前儿童肥胖风险:一项试点随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Nov 9;7(11):e10682. doi: 10.2196/10682.
4
Working With Parents to Prevent Childhood Obesity: Protocol for a Primary Care-Based eHealth Study.与家长合作预防儿童肥胖:一项基于初级保健的电子健康研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2015 Mar 25;4(1):e35. doi: 10.2196/resprot.4147.
5
Mobile Phone Support for Diabetes Self-Care Among Diverse Adults: Protocol for a Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.针对不同成年人糖尿病自我护理的手机支持:一项三臂随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Apr 10;7(4):e92. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9443.
6
A Remote Intervention to Prevent or Delay Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: Design, Recruitment, and Baseline Characteristics of the Virtual Cognitive Health (VC Health) Study.一项预防或延缓老年人认知障碍的远程干预措施:虚拟认知健康(VC健康)研究的设计、招募及基线特征
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Aug 13;7(8):e11368. doi: 10.2196/11368.
7
A Web- and Mobile-Based Intervention for Women Treated for Breast Cancer to Manage Chronic Pain and Symptoms Related to Lymphedema: Randomized Clinical Trial Rationale and Protocol.一项基于网络和移动设备的干预措施,用于乳腺癌治疗后女性管理慢性疼痛及与淋巴水肿相关的症状:随机临床试验原理与方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Jan 21;5(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5104.
8
The Effects of Positive Affect and Episodic Future Thinking on Temporal Discounting and Healthy Food Demand and Choice Among Overweight and Obese Individuals: Protocol for a Pilot 2×2 Factorial Randomized Controlled Study.积极情绪和情景式未来思维对超重和肥胖个体的时间折扣、健康食品需求及选择的影响:一项2×2析因随机对照试验的研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Mar 20;8(3):e12265. doi: 10.2196/12265.
9
A Self-Paced, Web-Based, Positive Emotion Skills Intervention for Reducing Symptoms of Depression: Protocol for Development and Pilot Testing of MARIGOLD.一种用于减轻抑郁症状的基于网络的自主节奏积极情绪技能干预:MARIGOLD开发与试点测试方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Jun 5;7(6):e10494. doi: 10.2196/10494.
10
Comparing the Effectiveness of Clinicians and Paraprofessionals to Reduce Disparities in Perinatal Depression via the Mothers and Babies Course: Protocol for a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.通过母婴课程比较临床医生和辅助专业人员减少围产期抑郁症差异的效果:一项整群随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Nov 20;7(11):e11624. doi: 10.2196/11624.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in Functional Food Ingredient Discovery and Characterisation: A Focus on Bioactive Plant and Food Peptides.人工智能在功能性食品成分发现与表征中的应用:聚焦生物活性植物肽和食物肽
Front Genet. 2021 Nov 19;12:768979. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.768979. eCollection 2021.
2
Comparison of Nutrigenomics Technology Interface Tools for Consumers and Health Professionals: A Sequential Explanatory Mixed Methods Investigation.面向消费者和健康专业人员的营养基因组学技术界面工具比较:一项序列解释性混合方法调查
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 28;21(6):e12580. doi: 10.2196/12580.
3
Food Security in the Context of Paternal Incarceration: Family Impact Perspectives.

本文引用的文献

1
The Evolving Role of Multivitamin/Multimineral Supplement Use among Adults in the Age of Personalized Nutrition.个性化营养时代成年人对多种维生素/多种矿物质补充剂使用的不断变化的作用。
Nutrients. 2018 Feb 22;10(2):248. doi: 10.3390/nu10020248.
2
Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice.评估基于基因型的饮食建议的科学有效性和证据的拟议指南。
Genes Nutr. 2017 Dec 15;12:35. doi: 10.1186/s12263-017-0584-0. eCollection 2017.
3
Precision Nutrition: A Review of Personalized Nutritional Approaches for the Prevention and Management of Metabolic Syndrome.
父囚背景下的粮食安全:家庭影响视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 4;16(5):776. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050776.
精准营养:个性化营养方法在预防和管理代谢综合征中的应用综述。
Nutrients. 2017 Aug 22;9(8):913. doi: 10.3390/nu9080913.
4
Can genetic-based advice help you lose weight? Findings from the Food4Me European randomized controlled trial.基于基因的建议能帮助你减肥吗?欧洲“为我选食物”随机对照试验的结果。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 May;105(5):1204-1213. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.145680. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
5
Polymorphisms of lipid metabolism enzyme-coding genes in patients with diabetic dyslipidemia.糖尿病血脂异常患者脂质代谢酶编码基因的多态性
Anatol J Cardiol. 2017 Apr;17(4):313-321. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2016.7142. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
6
Effect of an Internet-based, personalized nutrition randomized trial on dietary changes associated with the Mediterranean diet: the Food4Me Study.一项基于互联网的个性化营养随机试验对与地中海饮食相关的饮食变化的影响:Food4Me研究。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Aug;104(2):288-97. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.129049. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
7
Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.基于互联网的直接面向消费者的基因检测:一项系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 14;17(12):e279. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4378.
8
Effects of a Web-Based Personalized Intervention on Physical Activity in European Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的个性化干预对欧洲成年人身体活动的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Oct 14;17(10):e231. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4660.
9
Homocysteine, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, folate status and atherothrombosis: A mechanistic and clinical perspective.同型半胱氨酸、亚甲基四氢叶酸还原酶、叶酸状态与动脉粥样硬化血栓形成:机制与临床视角
Vascul Pharmacol. 2016 Mar;78:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
10
Nutrigenetics and nutrigenomics insights into diabetes etiopathogenesis.营养遗传学和营养基因组学对糖尿病病因发病机制的见解。
Nutrients. 2014 Nov 21;6(11):5338-69. doi: 10.3390/nu6115338.