Reply to Landy et al.: Terms and conditions may apply.
作者信息
Melnikoff David E, Bailey April H
机构信息
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520.
出版信息
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 19;115(25):E5637-E5638. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1807699115. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Reply to Landy et al.: Terms and conditions may apply.回复兰迪等人：条款和条件可能适用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 19;115(25):E5637-E5638. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1807699115. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
2
Reply to Claessens et al.: Maybe the Footbridge sacrifice is indeed the only one that sends a negative social signal.对克莱森斯等人的回应：或许天桥困境牺牲行为确实是唯一会传递负面社会信号的行为。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 16;117(24):13205-13206. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007044117.
3
Having hands and moral status: a reply to Curtis and Vehmas.拥有双手与道德地位：对柯蒂斯和韦马斯的回应
J Med Ethics. 2016 Apr;42(4):265. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103355. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
4
Competitive morality.竞争道德。
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Feb;36(1):97-8. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1200091X.
5
On the evolutionary origins of revenge and forgiveness: a converging systems hypothesis.论复仇和宽恕的进化起源：一个趋同系统假说。
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Feb;36(1):19-20. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000362. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
6
Necessity and least infringement conditions in public health ethics.公共卫生伦理中的必要性与最小侵害条件。
Med Health Care Philos. 2017 Dec;20(4):525-535. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9775-0.
7
Vicarious contagion decreases differentiation - and comes with costs.替代性传染会降低分化程度——而且还会带来代价。
Behav Brain Sci. 2016 Jan;39:e162. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X15001508.
8
Response to Faulkner et al.对福克纳等人的回应
Genet Med. 2021 Jan;23(1):243. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-00955-4. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
9
Baumard et al.'s moral markets lack market dynamics.鲍马等人的道德市场缺乏市场动态。
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Feb;36(1):89-90. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000945.
10
Correspondence on "Is there a duty to reinterpret genetic data? The ethical dimensions" by Appelbaum et al.关于阿佩尔鲍姆等人所著《是否有重新解读基因数据的义务？伦理维度》的通信
Genet Med. 2021 Jan;23(1):232-233. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-00954-5. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
本文引用的文献
1
Morality traits still dominate in forming impressions of others.在形成对他人的印象时，道德特质仍然占据主导地位。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 19;115(25):E5636. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1807096115. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
2
Preferences for moral vs. immoral traits in others are conditional.人们对他人的道德和不道德特征的偏好是有条件的。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jan 23;115(4):E592-E600. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1714945115. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
3
When It's Bad to Be Friendly and Smart: The Desirability of Sociability and Competence Depends on Morality.友善且聪明有时并非好事：社交能力与能力的可取性取决于道德。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Sep;42(9):1272-90. doi: 10.1177/0146167216655984. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
4
Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation.道德品质在人际知觉和评价中占主导地位。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Jan;106(1):148-68. doi: 10.1037/a0034726. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
5
Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change: a systems of reasoning analysis.理解内隐和外显态度改变：一种推理系统分析
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Dec;91(6):995-1008. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.995.
Zotero 插件