J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Jun;49(6):380-388. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.7916. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
Motor control exercise has been shown to be effective in the management of low back pain (LBP). However, the effect sizes for motor control exercise are modest, possibly because studies have used a one-size-fits-all approach, while the literature suggests that patients may differ in presence or type of motor control issues. In this commentary, we address the question of whether consideration of such variation in motor control issues might contribute to more personalized motor control exercise for patients with LBP. Such an approach is plausible, because motor control changes may play a role in persistence of pain through effects on tissue loading that may cause nociceptive afference, particularly in the case of peripheral sensitization. Subgrouping systems used in clinical practice, which comprise motor control aspects, allow reliable classification that is, in part, aligned with findings in studies on motor control in patients with LBP. Motor control issues may have heuristic value for treatment allocation, as the different presentations observed suggest different targets for motor control exercise, but this remains to be proven. Finally, clinical assessment of patients with LBP should take into account more aspects than motor control alone, including pain mechanisms, musculoskeletal health, and psychosocial factors, and may need to be embedded in a stratification approach based on prognosis to avoid undue diagnostic procedures. .
运动控制训练已被证明在腰痛(LBP)的管理中是有效的。然而,运动控制训练的效果大小是适度的,这可能是因为研究采用了一刀切的方法,而文献表明患者可能在运动控制问题的存在或类型上存在差异。在这篇评论中,我们探讨了这样一个问题,即考虑运动控制问题的这种变化是否有助于为患有 LBP 的患者提供更个性化的运动控制训练。这种方法是合理的,因为运动控制的改变可能通过对组织负荷的影响而在疼痛持续中发挥作用,从而引起伤害性传入,特别是在外周致敏的情况下。在临床实践中使用的亚组系统包括运动控制方面,允许进行可靠的分类,部分与 LBP 患者运动控制研究的发现一致。运动控制问题对于治疗分配可能具有启发价值,因为观察到的不同表现表明运动控制训练的不同目标,但这仍有待证明。最后,对 LBP 患者的临床评估应考虑到除运动控制以外的更多方面,包括疼痛机制、肌肉骨骼健康和社会心理因素,并可能需要嵌入基于预后的分层方法,以避免不必要的诊断程序。