J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Jun;49(6):437-452. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8451. Epub 2019 May 15.
Many approaches for low back pain (LBP) management focus on modifying motor control, which refers to motor, sensory, and central processes for control of posture and movement. A common assumption across approaches is that the way an individual loads the spine by typical postures, movements, and muscle activation strategies contributes to LBP symptom onset, persistence, and recovery. However, there are also divergent features from one approach to another. This commentary presents key principles of 4 clinical physical therapy approaches, including how each incorporates motor control in LBP management, the convergence and divergence of these approaches, and how they interface with medical LBP management. The approaches considered are movement system impairment syndromes of the lumbar spine, Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy, motor control training, and the integrated systems model. These were selected to represent the diversity of applications, including approaches using motor control as a central or an adjunct feature, and approaches that are evidence based or evidence informed. This identification of areas of convergence and divergence of approaches is designed to clarify the key aspects of each approach and thereby serve as a guide for the clinician and to provide a platform for considering a hybrid approach tailored to the individual patient. .
许多腰痛(LBP)管理方法都侧重于改变运动控制,这是指用于控制姿势和运动的运动、感觉和中枢过程。这些方法的一个共同假设是,个体通过典型姿势、运动和肌肉激活策略对脊柱的加载方式会导致 LBP 症状的发生、持续和恢复。然而,不同方法之间也存在明显的差异。本评论介绍了 4 种临床物理治疗方法的关键原则,包括每种方法如何将运动控制纳入 LBP 管理,这些方法的趋同和分歧,以及它们如何与医学 LBP 管理相衔接。所考虑的方法包括腰椎运动系统障碍综合征、机械诊断和治疗、运动控制训练以及综合系统模型。这些方法的选择代表了应用的多样性,包括将运动控制作为核心或辅助特征的方法,以及基于证据或循证的方法。这种对方法趋同和分歧的识别旨在澄清每种方法的关键方面,从而为临床医生提供指导,并为考虑针对个体患者量身定制的混合方法提供平台。