• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向对农场养育的更深入理解:一项定性研究。

Towards a deeper understanding of parenting on farms: A qualitative study.

机构信息

Canadian Centre for Health and Safety in Agriculture, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Jun 13;13(6):e0198796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198796. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0198796
PMID:29897960
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5999275/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Children living on farms experience exceptionally high risks for traumatic injury. There is a large body of epidemiological research documenting this phenomenon, yet few complementary studies that have explored the deep underlying reasons for such trends. Fundamental to this is understanding the decision-making processes of parents surrounding their choice to bring children, or not, into the farm worksite.

OBJECTIVES

To (1) document farm parent views of the risks and benefits of raising children on a family farm, and, (2) understand more deeply why children are brought into the farm worksite.

METHODS

Interviews were conducted as part of a larger cohort study, The Saskatchewan Farm Injury Cohort. Subsequent to an initial mail-out question focused on parental decision-making, 11 semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with rural Saskatchewan farm parents. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim, then thematically analyzed using interpretive description methodology.

FINDINGS

This parental decision-making process on farms fundamentally involves weighing the risks vs. benefits of bringing children into the worksite, as if on a balance scale. One side of this scale holds potential risks such as exposure to physical and chemical farm hazards, in the absence of full supervision. The other side holds potential benefits such as meeting family needs for childcare, labour, and family time; building work ethic and pride; and the positive impacts of involvement and responsibility. Decision-making 'tips the scales', in part dependent upon parental perceptions of the risk-benefit trade-off. This 'perceptual lens' is influenced by factors such as: the agricultural way of life, parents' prior knowledge and past experience, characteristics of children, and safety norms.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel qualitative study provides deep insight into how Saskatchewan farm parents approach a fundamental decision-making process associated with their parenting. The proposed model provides insight into the etiology of pediatric farm injuries as well as their prevention.

摘要

背景

生活在农场的儿童遭受创伤性伤害的风险极高。有大量的流行病学研究记录了这一现象,但很少有研究探讨导致这种趋势的深层次原因。理解父母在决定是否让孩子进入农场工作场所时的决策过程是至关重要的。

目的

(1)记录农场家长对在家庭农场抚养孩子的风险和收益的看法,(2)更深入地了解为什么孩子会被带到农场工作场所。

方法

访谈是作为一项更大的队列研究的一部分进行的,即萨斯喀彻温省农场伤害队列研究。在最初的邮件调查关注父母的决策之后,对 11 名萨斯喀彻温省农村农场家长进行了 11 次半结构化电话访谈。访谈进行了数字记录并逐字转录,然后使用解释性描述方法进行主题分析。

结果

这种在农场的父母决策过程从根本上涉及到权衡将孩子带入工作场所的风险与收益,就像在天平上一样。天平的一边是在没有充分监督的情况下接触物理和化学农场危害等潜在风险。另一边是满足家庭对儿童保育、劳动力和家庭时间的需求、培养职业道德和自豪感以及参与和责任的积极影响等潜在收益。决策“使天平倾斜”,部分取决于父母对风险-收益权衡的看法。这种“感知视角”受到农业生活方式、父母的先前知识和以往经验、孩子的特征以及安全规范等因素的影响。

结论

这项新颖的定性研究深入了解了萨斯喀彻温省农场家长如何处理与育儿相关的基本决策过程。所提出的模型为小儿农场伤害的病因学及其预防提供了深入的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4a/5999275/80fb4a72c0f9/pone.0198796.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4a/5999275/baa17d2eef31/pone.0198796.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4a/5999275/c66a35f2fdb0/pone.0198796.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4a/5999275/80fb4a72c0f9/pone.0198796.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4a/5999275/baa17d2eef31/pone.0198796.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4a/5999275/c66a35f2fdb0/pone.0198796.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4a/5999275/80fb4a72c0f9/pone.0198796.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Towards a deeper understanding of parenting on farms: A qualitative study.迈向对农场养育的更深入理解:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 13;13(6):e0198796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198796. eCollection 2018.
2
Broadening Our Understanding of Farm Children's Risk Exposure by Considering Their Parents' Farming Background.拓宽我们对农场儿童风险暴露的理解,考虑其父母的务农背景。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 14;18(10):5218. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105218.
3
Influence of Permissive Parenting on Youth Farm Risk Behaviors.放任型育儿方式对青少年农场风险行为的影响。
J Agromedicine. 2016;21(3):244-52. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2016.1179610.
4
Not raising a "bubble kid": farm parents' attitudes and practices regarding the employment, training and supervision of their children.不培养“泡泡孩子”:农场父母对其子女就业、培训和监管的态度与做法。
J Rural Health. 2002 Winter;18(1):57-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2002.tb00877.x.
5
Do parents' perceptions of risks protect children engaged in farm work?父母对风险的认知能保护从事农活的儿童吗?
Prev Med. 2005 Jun;40(6):860-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.10.007.
6
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
7
Determinants of agricultural injury: a novel application of population health theory.农业伤害的决定因素:人群健康理论的新应用。
Inj Prev. 2010 Dec;16(6):376-82. doi: 10.1136/ip.2010.026286. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
8
Children home alone unsupervised: modeling parental decisions and associated factors in Botswana, Mexico, and Vietnam.独自在家无人监管的儿童:博茨瓦纳、墨西哥和越南的父母决策及相关因素建模
Child Abuse Negl. 2009 May;33(5):312-23. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.09.010. Epub 2009 May 27.
9
'Communication is everything I think.' Parenting a child who needs Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC).“我认为沟通就是一切。”养育一个需要辅助和替代沟通(AAC)的孩子。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008 Jan-Feb;43(1):77-98. doi: 10.1080/13682820701267444.
10
Maternal perceptions of supervision in pre-school-aged children: a qualitative approach to understanding differences between families living in affluent and disadvantaged areas.学龄前儿童母亲对监管的认知:一种理解富裕地区与贫困地区家庭差异的质性研究方法
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2015 Jul;16(4):346-55. doi: 10.1017/S1463423614000218. Epub 2014 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
How Stressors and Facilitators of Work-Family Dynamics Interrelate and Affect Psychological Outcomes in Farming Women: A Mixed-Methods Approach in Chile.工作-家庭动态中的压力源与促进因素如何相互关联并影响农村女性的心理结果:智利的一种混合方法研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 21;13(14):1760. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13141760.
2
Editorial: Safeguarding youth from agricultural injury and illness: international experiences.社论:保护青少年免受农业伤害与疾病之害:国际经验
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 18;11:1270578. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1270578. eCollection 2023.
3
Navigating the Ethical and Methodological Dimensions of a Farm Safety Photovoice Project.

本文引用的文献

1
Using the Socio-Ecological Model to Frame Agricultural Safety and Health Interventions.运用社会生态模型构建农业安全与健康干预措施。
J Agromedicine. 2017;22(4):298-303. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2017.1356780.
2
Parents' Attitudes to Risk and Injury to Children and Young People on Farms.父母对农场中儿童和青少年面临的风险及伤害的态度。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 30;11(6):e0158368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158368. eCollection 2016.
3
Factors Related to Self-perceived Health in Rural Men and Women.农村男性和女性自我认知健康的相关因素。
探索农场安全影像纪实项目的伦理和方法论维度。
J Bioeth Inq. 2023 Jun;20(2):249-263. doi: 10.1007/s11673-023-10261-8. Epub 2023 May 23.
4
Do social influences, awareness, or experience matter? Toward a better understanding of Farm-related Injury Risk Perception among agricultural science college students in Ireland.社会影响、意识或经验重要吗?——爱尔兰农业科学专业大学生对与农场相关伤害风险感知的深入理解。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 27;11:1076332. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1076332. eCollection 2023.
5
Safeguarding youth from agricultural injury and illness: The United States' experience.保护青少年免受农业伤害和疾病:美国的经验。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 30;11:1048576. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1048576. eCollection 2023.
6
International commentary: Child injuries on the farm: A brief commentary from Canada.国际评论:农场中的儿童伤害:来自加拿大的简短评论
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 28;10:1050621. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1050621. eCollection 2022.
7
Childcare for farm families: A key strategy to keep children safe yet largely absent from farm programming.农场家庭的儿童保育:保障儿童安全的关键策略,但在农场项目中却基本缺失。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 8;10:1043774. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1043774. eCollection 2022.
8
Children, Work, and Safety on the Farm during COVID-19: A Harder Juggling Act.儿童、新冠疫情期间的农场工作与安全:更艰难的平衡。
J Agromedicine. 2022 Jul;27(3):315-328. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2022.2068716. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
9
Views and experiences of compassion in Sri Lankan students: An exploratory qualitative study.斯里兰卡学生的同情心观点和体验:一项探索性定性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 24;16(11):e0260475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260475. eCollection 2021.
10
Factors that Influence Farm Safety Decisions of Young Adults when Entering Agricultural Grain Bins.影响年轻成年人进入农业粮仓时农场安全决策的因素。
J Agric Saf Health. 2021 Jul 9;27(3):147-158. doi: 10.13031/jash.14450.
J Agromedicine. 2015;20(2):178-87. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2015.1010063.
4
Childhood agricultural injuries: an update for clinicians.儿童期农业伤害:临床医生最新资讯
Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2013 Feb;43(2):20-44. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2012.08.002.
5
Using protection motivation theory and formative research to guide an injury prevention intervention: increasing adherence to the North American Guidelines for Children's Agricultural Tasks.运用保护动机理论和形成性研究指导伤害预防干预:提高对《北美儿童农业任务指南》的依从性
Health Promot Pract. 2011 May;12(3):396-405. doi: 10.1177/1524839910362034.
6
Injury surveillance for youth on farms in the U.S., 2006.2006年美国农场青少年伤害监测
J Agric Saf Health. 2010 Oct;16(4):279-91. doi: 10.13031/2013.34838.
7
Prevention of agricultural injuries: an evaluation of an education-based intervention.农业伤害的预防:一项基于教育的干预措施评估
Inj Prev. 2008 Oct;14(5):290-5. doi: 10.1136/ip.2008.018515.
8
The Saskatchewan Farm Injury Cohort: rationale and methodology.萨斯喀彻温省农场伤害队列研究:基本原理与方法
Public Health Rep. 2008 Sep-Oct;123(5):567-75. doi: 10.1177/003335490812300506.
9
Adult supervision and pediatric injuries in the agricultural worksite.农业工作场所中的成人监管与儿童伤害
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 May;40(3):1149-56. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.12.007. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
10
Fatal work-related injuries in the agriculture production sector among youth in the United States, 1992-2002.1992 - 2002年美国青年农业生产部门与工作相关的致命伤害
J Agromedicine. 2006;11(2):57-65. doi: 10.1300/J096v11n02_09.