National Farm Medicine Center, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, 1000 N Oak Ave, Marshfield, WI 54449, USA.
Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 14;18(10):5218. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105218.
While farm safety researchers have seldom considered the association between farm parents' background and their children's safety, researchers who have compared first- and multi-generation farmers have found differences that may shape safety outcomes. We draw on the farm safety and family farm bodies of literature and a survey of 203 United States farm parents to assess the role of farming background in farm children risk exposure. Exploratory in nature, the bivariate analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between first- and multi-generation farmers in children injury, agricultural safety perceptions, knowledge, and practices but revealed differences in key demographic characteristics and parenting styles. A range of factors likely explain these findings with meso- and macro-level factors likely impacting farm parents' ability to adopt safety practices. In contrast to the emphasis on knowledge and behaviors, we call for the integration of lived realities in farm safety research and to do so in a way that connects realities and choices to larger contexts. We also call on the need to expand the toolkit of interventions to address meso- and macro-level factors. A shift towards addressing social and economic conditions in agriculture could reduce farm children's injuries while supporting the sustainability of farm labor systems.
虽然农场安全研究人员很少考虑农场父母的背景与其子女安全之间的关系,但比较第一代和多代农民的研究人员发现了可能影响安全结果的差异。我们借鉴了农场安全和家庭农场文献以及对 203 名美国农场父母的调查,评估了农业背景在农场儿童风险暴露中的作用。由于是探索性的,双变量分析显示,第一代和多代农民在儿童受伤、农业安全感知、知识和实践方面没有统计学上的显著差异,但在关键人口特征和育儿风格方面存在差异。一系列因素可能解释了这些发现,中观和宏观层面的因素可能影响了农场父母采用安全实践的能力。与强调知识和行为不同,我们呼吁将现实生活融入农场安全研究中,并以一种将现实和选择与更大的背景联系起来的方式进行。我们还呼吁有必要扩大干预措施的工具包,以解决中观和宏观层面的因素。解决农业中的社会和经济条件的转变可以减少农场儿童的受伤,同时支持农场劳动力系统的可持续性。