Suppr超能文献

拓宽我们对农场儿童风险暴露的理解,考虑其父母的务农背景。

Broadening Our Understanding of Farm Children's Risk Exposure by Considering Their Parents' Farming Background.

机构信息

National Farm Medicine Center, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, 1000 N Oak Ave, Marshfield, WI 54449, USA.

Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 14;18(10):5218. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105218.

Abstract

While farm safety researchers have seldom considered the association between farm parents' background and their children's safety, researchers who have compared first- and multi-generation farmers have found differences that may shape safety outcomes. We draw on the farm safety and family farm bodies of literature and a survey of 203 United States farm parents to assess the role of farming background in farm children risk exposure. Exploratory in nature, the bivariate analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between first- and multi-generation farmers in children injury, agricultural safety perceptions, knowledge, and practices but revealed differences in key demographic characteristics and parenting styles. A range of factors likely explain these findings with meso- and macro-level factors likely impacting farm parents' ability to adopt safety practices. In contrast to the emphasis on knowledge and behaviors, we call for the integration of lived realities in farm safety research and to do so in a way that connects realities and choices to larger contexts. We also call on the need to expand the toolkit of interventions to address meso- and macro-level factors. A shift towards addressing social and economic conditions in agriculture could reduce farm children's injuries while supporting the sustainability of farm labor systems.

摘要

虽然农场安全研究人员很少考虑农场父母的背景与其子女安全之间的关系,但比较第一代和多代农民的研究人员发现了可能影响安全结果的差异。我们借鉴了农场安全和家庭农场文献以及对 203 名美国农场父母的调查,评估了农业背景在农场儿童风险暴露中的作用。由于是探索性的,双变量分析显示,第一代和多代农民在儿童受伤、农业安全感知、知识和实践方面没有统计学上的显著差异,但在关键人口特征和育儿风格方面存在差异。一系列因素可能解释了这些发现,中观和宏观层面的因素可能影响了农场父母采用安全实践的能力。与强调知识和行为不同,我们呼吁将现实生活融入农场安全研究中,并以一种将现实和选择与更大的背景联系起来的方式进行。我们还呼吁有必要扩大干预措施的工具包,以解决中观和宏观层面的因素。解决农业中的社会和经济条件的转变可以减少农场儿童的受伤,同时支持农场劳动力系统的可持续性。

相似文献

1
Broadening Our Understanding of Farm Children's Risk Exposure by Considering Their Parents' Farming Background.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 14;18(10):5218. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105218.
2
Do parents' perceptions of risks protect children engaged in farm work?
Prev Med. 2005 Jun;40(6):860-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.10.007.
3
Towards a deeper understanding of parenting on farms: A qualitative study.
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 13;13(6):e0198796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198796. eCollection 2018.
4
Influence of Permissive Parenting on Youth Farm Risk Behaviors.
J Agromedicine. 2016;21(3):244-52. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2016.1179610.
5
Utilizing the Delphi method to develop parent and child surveys to understand exposure to farming hazards and attitudes toward farm safety.
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 9;10:1027426. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1027426. eCollection 2022.
6
Parents' Attitudes to Risk and Injury to Children and Young People on Farms.
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 30;11(6):e0158368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158368. eCollection 2016.
7
Farm Safety: A Study of Young Farmers' Awareness, Attitudes and Behaviors.
J Agromedicine. 2023 Jul;28(3):576-586. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2023.2180124. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
8
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
10
Telling Tales: Using Vignettes to Overcome Optimism Bias in Farm Health and Safety Attitudinal Studies.
J Agromedicine. 2024 Oct;29(4):531-546. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2365638. Epub 2024 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Profile and risk factors in farmer injuries: a review based on Haddon matrix and 5 E's risk reduction strategy.
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 6;12:1322884. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1322884. eCollection 2024.
2
The backover threat: adopting thermal imaging infrared sensor for agricultural safety.
J Inj Violence Res. 2023 Jul 18;15(2):189-92. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v15i2.1847.
4
Utilizing the Delphi method to develop parent and child surveys to understand exposure to farming hazards and attitudes toward farm safety.
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 9;10:1027426. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1027426. eCollection 2022.
5
Children, Work, and Safety on the Farm during COVID-19: A Harder Juggling Act.
J Agromedicine. 2022 Jul;27(3):315-328. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2022.2068716. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
6
Child Farm-Related Injury in Australia: A Review of the Literature.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 4;18(11):6063. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18116063.

本文引用的文献

1
The invisible labor and multidimensional impacts of negotiating childcare on farms.
Agric Human Values. 2021;38(2):431-447. doi: 10.1007/s10460-020-10162-1. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
3
A Farm Kid Paradox.
J Anthropol N Am. 2019 Fall;22(2):139-142. doi: 10.1002/nad.12118. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
4
Key Risk Factors Affecting Farmers' Mental Health: A Systematic Review.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 2;16(23):4849. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234849.
5
A Comparison of Pediatric Traumatic Injuries on Farms and Residences from 2009 to 2014.
J Rural Health. 2019 Sep;35(4):453-459. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12372. Epub 2019 May 14.
6
Why do farm accidents persist? Normalising danger on the farm within the farm family.
Sociol Health Illn. 2019 Mar;41(3):470-483. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12824. Epub 2018 Nov 18.
8
Towards a deeper understanding of parenting on farms: A qualitative study.
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 13;13(6):e0198796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198796. eCollection 2018.
9
Child Work Safety on the Farms of Local Agricultural Market Producers: Parent and Child Perspectives.
J Agromedicine. 2018;23(1):52-59. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2017.1387635.
10
Using the Socio-Ecological Model to Frame Agricultural Safety and Health Interventions.
J Agromedicine. 2017;22(4):298-303. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2017.1356780.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验