Suppr超能文献

基于重症监护病房的结果的质量指标之间的关系。

The association between outcome-based quality indicators for intensive care units.

机构信息

Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Department: Medical Informatics, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Intensive Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Jun 13;13(6):e0198522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198522. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess and improve the effectiveness of ICU care, in-hospital mortality rates are often used as principal quality indicator for benchmarking purposes. Two other often used, easily quantifiable, quality indicators to assess the efficiency of ICU care are based on readmission to the ICU and ICU length of stay. Our aim was to examine whether there is an association between case-mix adjusted outcome-based quality indicators in the general ICU population as well as within specific subgroups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included patients admitted in 2015 of all Dutch ICUs. We derived the standardized in-hospital mortality ratio (SMR); the standardized readmission ratio (SRR); and the standardized length of stay ratio (SLOSR). We expressed association through Pearson's correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

The SMR ranged from 0.6 to 1.5; the SRR ranged from 0.7 to 2.1; and the SLOSR ranged from 0.7 to 1.3. For the total ICU population we found no significant associations. We found a positive, non-significant, association between SMR and SLOSR for admissions with low-mortality risk, (r = 0.25; p = 0.024), and a negative association between these indicators for admissions with high-mortality risk (r = -0.49; p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Overall, we found no association at ICU population level. Differential associations were found between performance on mortality and length of stay within different risk strata. We recommend users of quality information to take these three outcome indicators into account when benchmarking ICUs as they capture different aspects of ICU performance. Furthermore, we suggest to report quality indicators for patient subgroups.

摘要

目的

为了评估和提高 ICU 护理的效果,住院死亡率通常被用作基准比较的主要质量指标。另外两个常用于评估 ICU 护理效率的、易于量化的质量指标是基于 ICU 再入院率和 ICU 住院时间。我们的目的是检验一般 ICU 人群以及特定亚组中,基于病例组合调整的基于结果的质量指标之间是否存在关联。

材料和方法

我们纳入了 2015 年所有荷兰 ICU 的患者。我们得出了标准化住院死亡率比(SMR);标准化再入院率(SRR);以及标准化住院时间比(SLOSR)。我们通过皮尔逊相关系数来表示关联。

结果

SMR 范围为 0.6 至 1.5;SRR 范围为 0.7 至 2.1;SLOSR 范围为 0.7 至 1.3。对于整个 ICU 人群,我们没有发现显著的关联。我们发现低死亡率风险患者的 SMR 和 SLOSR 之间存在正相关(r = 0.25;p = 0.024),而高死亡率风险患者的这两个指标之间存在负相关(r = -0.49;p<0.001)。

结论

总体而言,我们在 ICU 人群水平上没有发现关联。在不同风险分层中,死亡率和住院时间之间的表现存在差异关联。我们建议质量信息使用者在对 ICU 进行基准比较时,考虑这三个结果指标,因为它们捕捉了 ICU 表现的不同方面。此外,我们建议报告患者亚组的质量指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6da0/5999279/66cd67621233/pone.0198522.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验