Rodrigues João Lima, Rocha Patrícia Souza, Pardim Silvia Letícia de Souza, Machado Ana Cláudia Vieira, Faria-E-Silva André Luis, Seraidarian Paulo Isaías
PUC Minas - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
FUNORTE - Faculdades Unidas do Norte de Minas, Montes Claros, MG, Brazil.
Braz Dent J. 2018 Mar-Apr;29(2):133-139. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201801726.
This controlled randomized clinical trial evaluated the effect of associating at-home and in-office bleaching procedures on tooth sensitivity (TS) and bleaching effectiveness. Forty patients subjected to on session of in-office bleaching with 38% peroxide hydrogen. Subsequently, the patients were randomly allocated to receive a second session of in-office bleaching or to use a tray containing 10% carbamide peroxide delivered during 7 consecutive days. The worst TS score reported during or after each bleaching procedure was recorded using a verbal rating scale and TS risk (score different from 0) was calculated. Color changes were measured 7 days after each in-office session (for patients receiving in-office procedures only) or after the end of at-home bleaching (for the combined protocol), and 6 months after the last procedure for both bleaching protocols. Color was assessed by a spectrophotometer and by color match with the Vita Classical and Bleach guide scales. Statistical analyses were carried out to assess possible differences between the protocols regarding the outcomes and to analyze the effect of time of assessment on color changes. The bleaching protocol did not affect the risk for and the maximum level of TS reported, irrespective of the time of assessment. In the color evaluation, the bleaching protocol also did not affect the ultimate tooth color. In conclusion, after one in-office bleaching session, there was no difference in bleaching effectiveness and TS between performing a second in-office session and associating it with 1-week at-home bleaching.
这项对照随机临床试验评估了联合家庭和诊室漂白程序对牙齿敏感(TS)及漂白效果的影响。40名患者接受了一次使用38%过氧化氢的诊室漂白。随后,患者被随机分配接受第二次诊室漂白或使用含10%过氧化脲的托盘连续7天进行家庭漂白。使用语言评定量表记录每次漂白程序期间或之后报告的最严重TS评分,并计算TS风险(评分不为0)。对于仅接受诊室程序的患者,在每次诊室漂白后7天测量颜色变化;对于联合方案,则在家庭漂白结束后测量颜色变化,且两种漂白方案在最后一次程序后6个月测量颜色变化。通过分光光度计以及与Vita经典比色板和漂白比色板进行颜色匹配来评估颜色。进行统计分析以评估两种方案在结果方面的可能差异,并分析评估时间对颜色变化的影响。无论评估时间如何,漂白方案均不影响报告的TS风险和最高水平。在颜色评估中,漂白方案也不影响最终牙齿颜色。总之,在一次诊室漂白后,进行第二次诊室漂白或将其与1周家庭漂白相结合,在漂白效果和TS方面没有差异。