Aix Marseille Université, IRD, AP-HM, MEPHI, IHU-Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France.
Aix Marseille Université, IRD, AP-HM, VITROME, IHU-Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France.
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Aug 27;56(9). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00542-18. Print 2018 Sep.
Endocarditis and vascular infections are common manifestations of persistent localized infection due to , and recently, fluorescence hybridization (FISH) was proposed as an alternative tool for their diagnosis. In this study, we evaluated the efficiency of FISH in a series of valve and vascular samples infected by We tested 23 -positive valves and thrombus samples obtained from patients with Q fever endocarditis. Seven aneurysms and thrombus specimens were retrieved from patients with Q fever vascular infections. Samples were analyzed by culture, immunochemistry, and FISH with oligonucleotide and PNA probes targeting -specific 16S rRNA sequences. The immunohistochemical analysis was positive for five (17%) samples with significantly more copies of DNA than the negative ones ( = 0.02). FISH was positive for 13 (43%) samples and presented 43% and 40% sensitivity compared to that for quantitative PCR (qPCR) and culture, respectively. PNA FISH detected in 18 (60%) samples and presented 60% and 55% sensitivity compared to that for qPCR and culture, respectively. Immunohistochemistry had 38% and 28% sensitivity compared to that for FISH and PNA FISH, respectively. Samples found positive by both immunohistochemistry and PNA FISH contained significantly more copies of DNA than the negative ones ( = 0.03). Finally, PNA FISH was more sensitive than FISH (60% versus 43%, respectively) for the detection of We provide evidence that PNA FISH and FISH are important assays for the diagnosis of endocarditis and vascular infections.
心内膜炎和血管感染是由持续性局部感染引起的常见表现,最近荧光杂交(FISH)被提议作为其诊断的替代工具。在这项研究中,我们评估了 FISH 在一系列感染 的心瓣膜和血管样本中的效率。我们测试了 23 例由 Q 热心内膜炎患者获得的阳性瓣膜和血栓样本。从 Q 热血管感染患者中获得了 7 个动脉瘤和血栓标本。使用针对 -特异性 16S rRNA 序列的寡核苷酸和 PNA 探针通过培养、免疫化学和 FISH 分析样本。免疫组织化学分析对 5 个(17%)样本呈阳性,这些样本的 DNA 拷贝数明显高于阴性样本(=0.02)。FISH 对 13 个(43%)样本呈阳性,与定量 PCR(qPCR)和培养相比,其灵敏度分别为 43%和 40%。PNA FISH 在 18 个(60%)样本中检测到 ,与 qPCR 和培养相比,其灵敏度分别为 60%和 55%。免疫组织化学与 FISH 和 PNA FISH 相比,其灵敏度分别为 38%和 28%。通过免疫组织化学和 PNA FISH 均呈阳性的样本中 DNA 的拷贝数明显高于阴性样本(=0.03)。最后,PNA FISH 比 FISH 更敏感(分别为 60%和 43%),用于检测 我们提供了证据表明 PNA FISH 和 FISH 是诊断 心内膜炎和血管感染的重要检测方法。