Suppr超能文献

科学传播中的诚信管理。

Stewardship of Integrity in Scientific Communication.

作者信息

Albertine Kurt H

机构信息

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

出版信息

Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2018 Sep;301(9):1481-1487. doi: 10.1002/ar.23858.

Abstract

Integrity in the pursuit of discovery through application of the scientific method and reporting the results is an obligation for each of us as scientists. We cannot let the value of science be diminished because discovering knowledge is vital to understand ourselves and our impacts on the earth. We support the value of science by our stewardship of integrity in the conduct, training, reporting, and proposing of scientific investigation. The players who have these responsibilities are authors, reviewers, editors, and readers. Each role has to be played with vigilance for ethical behavior, including compliance with regulations for protections of study subjects, use of select agents and biohazards, regulations of use of stem cells, resource sharing, posting datasets to public repositories, and so on. The positive take-home message is that the scientific community is taking steps in behavior to protect the integrity of science. Anat Rec, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Anat Rec, 301:1481-1487, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

摘要

通过应用科学方法追求发现并报告结果时保持诚信,是我们每一位科学家的义务。我们不能让科学的价值被贬低,因为发现知识对于理解我们自身以及我们对地球的影响至关重要。我们通过在科学研究的开展、培训、报告和提议过程中坚守诚信来维护科学的价值。承担这些责任的主体包括作者、审稿人、编辑和读者。每个角色都必须警惕道德行为,包括遵守保护研究对象的法规、使用特定病原体和生物危害物、干细胞使用规定、资源共享、将数据集发布到公共存储库等等。积极的信息是科学界正在采取行动保护科学的诚信。《解剖学记录》,2018年。© 2018 威利期刊公司。《解剖学记录》,301:1481 - 1487,2018年。© 2018 威利期刊公司。

相似文献

1
Stewardship of Integrity in Scientific Communication.科学传播中的诚信管理。
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2018 Sep;301(9):1481-1487. doi: 10.1002/ar.23858.
7
Maintaining the Public Trust in Journals with Ethical Publishing.通过道德出版维护公众对期刊的信任。
J Med Toxicol. 2017 Dec;13(4):275-277. doi: 10.1007/s13181-017-0635-3. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
8
The voice of evidence.证据之声。
Elife. 2018 Jul 11;7:e39915. doi: 10.7554/eLife.39915.
9
Pitfalls and Misconducts in Medical Writing.医学写作中的陷阱与不当行为。
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2019 Dec;18(4):350-353. doi: 10.1177/1534734619870083. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

本文引用的文献

2
Shaping the Future of Research: a perspective from junior scientists.塑造研究的未来:初级科学家的视角
F1000Res. 2014 Nov 28;3:291. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.5878.2. eCollection 2014.
3
How to make more published research true.如何让更多已发表的研究成果真实可靠。
PLoS Med. 2014 Oct 21;11(10):e1001747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001747. eCollection 2014 Oct.
4
Why has the number of scientific retractions increased?为什么科学撤稿的数量增加了?
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 8;8(7):e68397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068397. Print 2013.
5
Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications.不当行为导致了大多数被撤回的科学出版物。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 16;109(42):17028-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212247109. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
7
Science publishing: The trouble with retractions.科学出版:撤稿的麻烦。
Nature. 2011 Oct 5;478(7367):26-8. doi: 10.1038/478026a.
9
Data integrity, reliability and fraud in medical research.医学研究中的数据完整性、可靠性和欺诈。
Eur J Intern Med. 2010 Feb;21(1):40-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2009.11.002. Epub 2009 Nov 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验