Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜修复在治疗女性原发性腹股沟疝方面优于开放技术:一项基于全国登记的队列研究。

Laparoscopic repair is superior to open techniques when treating primary groin hernias in women: a nationwide register-based cohort study.

机构信息

Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2019 Jan;33(1):71-78. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6270-5. Epub 2018 Jun 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies have described recurrence rates after groin hernia repair in women. Our aim was to investigate if laparoscopic repair of primary groin hernias in women results in a lower reoperation rate for recurrence compared with open repairs. Furthermore, we wished to compare hernia subtypes at primary repair and reoperation.

METHODS

This nationwide cohort study was reported according to the RECORD statement. We used prospectively collected data from the Danish Hernia Database to generate a cohort of females operated for a primary groin hernia from 1998 to 2017. Our primary outcome was reoperation for recurrence. The secondary outcome was subtype of hernia at primary repair and reoperation. All females had at least 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

We included 13,945 primary groin hernia operations in women, of whom 649 had undergone a reoperation for recurrence. Median follow-up time was 8.8 years. The cumulative reoperation rates were lower after laparoscopic repair compared with the open techniques, for both inguinal hernias (1.8 vs. 6.3%, p < 0.001) and femoral hernias (2.2 vs. 5.5%, p = 0.005). After laparoscopic repair, 25% of inguinal hernias recurred as femoral, compared with 47% after Lichtenstein (p < 0.001). Direct inguinal hernias and femoral hernias had higher risk of reoperation for recurrence after open repair compared with indirect inguinal hernias. For laparoscopic procedures, hernia subtypes at the primary groin hernia repair had similar reoperation rates.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic repair of primary groin hernia in women had lower reoperation rates and fewer femoral recurrences than open repair techniques.

摘要

背景

鲜有研究描述女性腹股沟疝修补术后的复发率。我们旨在研究女性腹腔镜修补原发性腹股沟疝是否比开放修补术的复发再手术率更低。此外,我们还希望比较初次修补和再次手术时的疝亚型。

方法

本项全国性队列研究根据 RECORD 声明进行报告。我们使用丹麦疝数据库中前瞻性收集的数据,生成了 1998 年至 2017 年期间接受原发性腹股沟疝手术的女性队列。我们的主要结局是复发再手术。次要结局是初次修补和再次手术时的疝亚型。所有女性均有至少 6 个月的随访。

结果

我们纳入了 13945 例女性原发性腹股沟疝手术,其中 649 例因复发而行再次手术。中位随访时间为 8.8 年。与开放技术相比,腹腔镜修补后的累积再手术率较低,无论是腹股沟疝(1.8%比 6.3%,p<0.001)还是股疝(2.2%比 5.5%,p=0.005)。腹腔镜修补后,25%的腹股沟疝复发为股疝,而 Lichtenstein 修补后为 47%(p<0.001)。与间接腹股沟疝相比,开放修补后直接腹股沟疝和股疝的复发再手术风险更高。对于腹腔镜手术,初次腹股沟疝修补时的疝亚型有相似的再手术率。

结论

女性腹腔镜修补原发性腹股沟疝的再手术率更低,复发为股疝的比例也低于开放修补技术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验