Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental Faculty Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Jun 15;24:4091-4100. doi: 10.12659/MSM.908606.
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of 2 different esthetic post materials on the final color of direct-composite restorations by using a digital technique under in vivo conditions. MATERIAL AND METHODS We included 22 pulpless incisor teeth treated with conventionally cemented zirconia (n=11) and polyethylene fiber (n=11) posts in the study. Teeth were restored with a hybrid resin. The color of direct-composite restorations and contralateral control teeth was measured using a digital technique. The Commission Internationale de L'Eclairage, or CIE, Lab* and RGB color systems were investigated. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed for the CIE Lab* values. Color differences (ΔE) for the average L*, a*, and b* color parameters between every pair of groups were calculated (P>.05). RESULTS Significant differences were not found in the color difference luminosity (lum), R, G, B, and L* a* b* values between the zircon-rich glass fiber post (Z) and contralateral control teeth (Cz) (P>.05) and between the polyethylene fiber post (P) and contralateral control teeth (Cp) (P>.05). However, there was a statistically significant difference between the color a* values of the polyethylene fiber post (P) and contralateral control teeth (Cp) (p<0.05). Color differences (ΔE) between the zircon-rich glass fiber post (Z) and contralateral control teeth, and the polyethylene fiber post (P) and contralateral teeth were not statistically significant (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS Definitive restorations were equally affected by the 2 materials. Both materials can be used reliably in clinical practice. However, further research that focuses on the effect of intraoral conditions is needed.
本研究旨在通过活体条件下的数字技术,确定两种不同的美学桩材料对直接复合修复体最终颜色的影响。
我们将 22 颗牙髓已失的切牙纳入研究,这些切牙分别采用常规黏接氧化锆(n=11)和聚乙烯纤维(n=11)桩进行治疗。牙齿用混合树脂修复。使用数字技术测量直接复合修复体和对侧对照牙的颜色。研究了国际照明委员会(Commission Internationale de L'Eclairage,CIE)的 Lab和 RGB 颜色系统。对 CIE Lab值进行描述性统计分析。计算了每对组之间平均 L*、a和 b颜色参数的颜色差异(ΔE)(P>.05)。
在富锆玻璃纤维桩(Z)与对侧对照牙(Cz)(P>.05)以及聚乙烯纤维桩(P)与对侧对照牙(Cp)(P>.05)之间,颜色差异亮度(lum)、R、G、B 和 Lab值无显著差异。然而,聚乙烯纤维桩(P)与对侧对照牙(Cp)的 a颜色值存在统计学显著差异(p<0.05)。富锆玻璃纤维桩(Z)与对侧对照牙和聚乙烯纤维桩(P)与对侧对照牙之间的颜色差异(ΔE)无统计学意义(P>.05)。
两种材料对最终修复体的颜色影响相同。两种材料均可在临床实践中可靠使用。然而,需要进一步研究关注口腔内条件的影响。