UMR CNRS 6144 GEPEA, IMT Atlantique, Campus de Nantes, La Chantrerie, 4 rue Alfred Kastler, CS 20722, 44307, Nantes Cedex 3, France.
N Biotechnol. 2018 Nov 25;46:31-37. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
In order to limit ammonia (NH) emissions from pig farms, various air cleaning solutions are widely applied. However, the literature data report that these systems (chemical scrubbers, bioscrubbers and biofilters) can be both inefficient and promote nitrous oxide (NO) production. As air cleaning technologies should not contribute to secondary trace gases that may have a stronger environmental impact than the raw gas compounds themselves, the objective of this study was to quantify the effect of NH treatment in pig farms on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. GHGs (carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide) emitted at the outlet of three different cleaning systems ("chemical scrubber", "bioscrubber" and "bioscrubber + denitrification step") were assessed and compared with the emissions generated by the exhaust air with "no treatment". The calculations show that the chemical scrubber has no effect whereas biological treatments can increase GHG emissions. The use of bioscrubbers alone for NH removal can remain acceptable provided that less than 3% of the NH entering the apparatus is converted into NO. In such cases, a maximum increase of 1.9% in GHG emissions could be obtained. Conversely, the addition of a denitrification step to a bioscrubber must be avoided. Increases in overall GHG emissions of up to 25.8% were calculated but more significant increases could occur. With regard to GHG emissions, it is concluded that the use of a chemical scrubber is more suitable than a bioscrubber to treat exhaust air from pig farms.
为了限制猪场氨气(NH)排放,广泛应用了各种空气净化解决方案。然而,文献数据表明,这些系统(化学洗涤器、生物洗涤器和生物过滤器)可能效率低下,并促进氧化亚氮(NO)的产生。由于空气净化技术不应促成可能比原始气体化合物本身具有更强环境影响的次生痕量气体的产生,因此本研究的目的是量化猪场 NH 处理对温室气体(GHG)排放的影响。评估了三种不同清洁系统(“化学洗涤器”、“生物洗涤器”和“生物洗涤器+反硝化步骤”)出口处排放的 GHG(二氧化碳、甲烷和氧化亚氮),并将其与“无处理”产生的废气排放进行了比较。计算表明,化学洗涤器没有效果,而生物处理可以增加 GHG 排放。如果进入设备的 NH 中有小于 3%转化为 NO,则单独使用生物洗涤器去除 NH 仍可接受。在这种情况下,GHG 排放最多可增加 1.9%。相反,必须避免在生物洗涤器中添加反硝化步骤。计算出 GHG 排放的总体增加高达 25.8%,但可能会出现更大的增加。关于 GHG 排放,得出的结论是,与生物洗涤器相比,使用化学洗涤器更适合处理猪场的废气。