Yammine Salwa, Jabbour Edgard, Diemer Franck, Majzoub Zeina
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Lebanese University, Hadath, Beirut, Lebanon.
Université Paul Sabatier, Institut Clément Ader, CHU de Toulouse, France.
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2018 May-Jun;8(3):245-251. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_18_18. Epub 2018 May 17.
The aim of the present study to compare canal straightening following shaping of curved canals with three types of new generation nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary instruments-ProTaper Next (PTN), BT RaCe (BTR), and WaveOne Gold (WOG)- and three different levels of protrusion beyond the major apical foramen.
Forty-five extracted human maxillary and mandibular molars with at least one curved canal were distributed in three comparable groups of 15 canals each. The canals were instrumented to the major foramen and then overinstrumented with the final file 0.5 mm, 1 mm, and 1.5 mm beyond the foramen using PTN (Group PTN = 15), BTR (Group BTR = 15), and WOG (Group WOG = 15). Standardized pre- and post-instrumentation radiographs of the root canal were obtained for all groups using digital intraoral radiographs coupled with software. Differences in the degree of curvature were regarded as straightening and canal curvature was evaluated based on Schneider technique using the AmScope software for measurements and compared between groups and levels of instrumentation applying Mixed-model ANOVA. Significance was set at 0.05.
Canal curvature tended to gradually straighten out as the level of instrumentation increased in all three groups without statistically significant difference among the groups ( = 0.826).
Overinstrumentation in curved canals resulted in straightening of the canal curvature.
本研究旨在比较使用三种新一代镍钛(NiTi)旋转器械——ProTaper Next(PTN)、BT RaCe(BTR)和WaveOne Gold(WOG)对弯曲根管进行预备后根管变直的情况,以及超出根尖孔主要开口三种不同程度的突出情况。
45颗拔除的人上颌和下颌磨牙,每颗至少有一条弯曲根管,被分为三组,每组15条根管。将根管预备至主要根尖孔,然后分别使用PTN(PTN组 = 15)、BTR(BTR组 = 15)和WOG(WOG组 = 15)超出根尖孔0.5毫米、1毫米和1.5毫米用最终锉进行过度预备。使用数字口腔内X光片结合软件为所有组获取根管预备前后的标准化X光片。将曲率的差异视为变直情况,并基于施奈德技术,使用AmScope软件进行测量来评估根管曲率,在组间以及不同预备水平之间应用混合模型方差分析进行比较。显著性设定为0.05。
在所有三组中,随着预备水平的提高,根管曲率均有逐渐变直的趋势,组间无统计学显著差异(P = 0.826)。
弯曲根管的过度预备导致根管曲率变直。