Gil-Rojas Yaneth, Lasalvia Pieralessandro, Hernández Fabián, Castañeda-Cardona Camilo, Rosselli Diego
NeuroEconomix, Bogota, Colombia.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Facultad de Medicina de la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018 May;40(5):242-250. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1655747. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
To assess the cost-effectiveness of carbetocin versus oxytocin for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) due to uterine atony after vaginal delivery/cesarean section in women with risk factors for bleeding.
A decision tree was developed for vaginal delivery and another one for cesarean, in which a sequential analysis of the results was obtained with the use of carbetocin and oxytocin for prevention of PPH and related consequences. A third-party payer perspective was used; only direct medical costs were considered. Incremental costs and effectiveness in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were evaluated for a one-year time horizon. The costs were expressed in 2016 Colombian pesos (1 USD = 3,051 Col$).
In the vaginal delivery model, the average cost of care for a patient receiving prophylaxis with uterotonic agents was Col$ 347,750 with carbetocin and Col$ 262,491 with oxytocin, while the QALYs were 0.9980 and 0.9979, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is above the cost-effectiveness threshold adopted by Colombia. In the model developed for cesarean section, the average cost of a patient receiving prophylaxis with uterotonics was Col$ 461,750 with carbetocin, and Col$ 481,866 with oxytocin, and the QALYs were 0.9959 and 0.9926, respectively. Carbetocin has lower cost and is more effective, with a saving of Col$ 94,887 per avoided hemorrhagic event.
In case of elective cesarean delivery, carbetocin is a dominant alternative in the prevention of PPH compared with oxytocin; however, it presents higher costs than oxytocin, with similar effectiveness, in cases of vaginal delivery.
评估卡贝缩宫素与缩宫素在预防有出血风险因素的女性阴道分娩/剖宫产术后因子宫收缩乏力导致的产后出血(PPH)方面的成本效益。
为阴道分娩和剖宫产分别建立了决策树,其中对使用卡贝缩宫素和缩宫素预防PPH及其相关后果的结果进行了序贯分析。采用第三方支付者视角;仅考虑直接医疗成本。在一年的时间范围内评估了增量成本和质量调整生命年(QALY)方面的有效性。成本以2016年哥伦比亚比索表示(1美元 = 3,051哥伦比亚比索)。
在阴道分娩模型中,接受宫缩剂预防的患者,使用卡贝缩宫素的平均护理成本为347,750哥伦比亚比索,使用缩宫素的为262,491哥伦比亚比索,而QALY分别为0.9980和0.9979。增量成本效益比高于哥伦比亚采用的成本效益阈值。在为剖宫产建立的模型中,接受宫缩剂预防的患者,使用卡贝缩宫素的平均成本为461,750哥伦比亚比索,使用缩宫素的为481,866哥伦比亚比索,QALY分别为0.9959和0.9926。卡贝缩宫素成本更低且更有效,每避免一次出血事件可节省94,887哥伦比亚比索。
在择期剖宫产的情况下,与缩宫素相比,卡贝缩宫素在预防PPH方面是一种优势选择;然而,在阴道分娩的情况下,它与缩宫素效果相似,但成本更高。