Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memory and Alzheimer's Treatment Center andAlzheimer's Disease Research Center, Division of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neuropsychiatry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;64(2):597-606. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180121.
Given recent challenges in developing new treatments for Alzheimer dementia (AD), it is vital to explore alternate treatment targets, such as neuromodulation for circuit dysfunction. We previously reported an exploratory Phase IIb double-blind trial of deep brain stimulation targeting the fornix (DBS-f) in mild AD (the ADvance trial). We reported safety but no clinical benefits of DBS-f versus the delayed-on (sham) treatment in 42 participants after one year. However, secondary post hoc analyses of the one-year data suggested a possible DBS-f benefit for participants≥65 years.
To examine the long-term safety and clinical effects of sustained and delayed-on DBS-f treatment of mild AD after two years.
42 participants underwent implantation of DBS-f electrodes, with half randomized to active DBS-f stimulation (early on) for two years and half to delayed-on (sham) stimulation after 1 year to provide 1 year of active DBS-f stimulation (delayed on). We evaluated safety and clinical outcomes over the two years of the trial.
DBS-f had a favorable safety profile with similar rates of adverse events across both trial phases (years 1 and 2) and between treatment arms. There were no differences between treatment arms on any primary clinical outcomes. However, post-hoc age group analyses suggested a possible benefit among older (>65) participants.
DBS-f was safe. Additional study of mechanisms of action and methods for titrating stimulation parameters will be needed to determine if DBS has potential as an AD treatment. Future efficacy studies should focus on patients over age 65.
鉴于最近在开发阿尔茨海默病(AD)新疗法方面面临的挑战,探索替代治疗靶点至关重要,例如针对电路功能障碍的神经调节。我们之前报告了一项针对轻度 AD 患者穹窿内深部脑刺激(DBS-f)的探索性 IIb 期双盲试验(ADvance 试验)。我们报告了安全性,但在 42 名参与者一年后,DBS-f 与延迟开启(假)治疗相比没有临床获益。然而,一年数据的二次事后分析表明,DBS-f 对≥65 岁的参与者可能有获益。
检查持续和延迟开启 DBS-f 治疗轻度 AD 两年后的长期安全性和临床效果。
42 名参与者接受了 DBS-f 电极植入,其中一半随机分为主动 DBS-f 刺激(早期)两年,另一半在 1 年后延迟开启(假)刺激,以提供 1 年的主动 DBS-f 刺激(延迟开启)。我们评估了试验两年期间的安全性和临床结果。
DBS-f 具有良好的安全性,在两个试验阶段(第 1 年和第 2 年)和治疗臂之间,不良事件的发生率相似。在任何主要临床结果上,治疗臂之间均无差异。然而,事后年龄组分析表明,老年(>65 岁)参与者可能存在获益。
DBS-f 是安全的。需要进一步研究作用机制和刺激参数调整方法,以确定 DBS 是否有作为 AD 治疗的潜力。未来的疗效研究应关注 65 岁以上的患者。