Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences and CeSi-Met, 'G. D'Annunzio' University of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini 31, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences University of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini 31, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 16;15(6):1277. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061277.
Post-operative pain and swelling are frequently observed after sinus lift procedures. The aim of the present study was the clinical evaluation of swelling and pain of two different sinus flap lift techniques using a visual analogue scale (VAS), verbal rating scale (VRS), and infrared thermal imaging (i.e., thermography). : A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 15 patients (30 sinuses in total) randomly allocated into two groups. For the sinuses of Group I a trapezoidal flap was used, while for Group II a modified triangular flap without anterior release was utilized. Postoperative pain was scored by means of a 100-mm VAS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain imaginable), and was recorded at 2, 4, 6 and 14 days after surgery. Swelling was recorded by a verbal rating scale (VRS) and was classified into four categories: a score of 1 referred the absence of swelling, patients with intra-oral swelling in the surgical zone scored 2, any extra-oral swelling in the surgical zone scored 3, and intense swelling exhibited by extra-oral swelling extending beyond the surgical zone scored 4. The facial temperature was recorded before and after sinus augmentation, and at 2, 4, 6, and 14 days post-surgery to check the course of healing. : In Group I pain intensity was recorded at 2 days after surgery with a mean score of 38.67 ± 6.4 mm. Swelling was greater at 2 and 4 days, and was absent at day 6. The facial temperature difference before and after the procedure was 4.737 °C ± 0.37. In Group II the pain score were lower than in Group I ( < 0.05). The score for swelling was 2 on the first and second days, and was reduced on day 4. After the second day the difference in temperature was significantly reduced as compared to the day of surgery (0.77 °C); at 2 and 4 days no difference was registered. : The results of this clinical study show the significant effectiveness of the modified triangular flap in the sinus lift procedure for reducing pain and swelling.
术后疼痛和肿胀是鼻窦提升手术后经常观察到的。本研究的目的是通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)、语言评定量表(VRS)和红外热成像(即热成像)对两种不同鼻窦皮瓣提升技术的肿胀和疼痛进行临床评估。 :一项随机对照试验共纳入 15 名患者(共 30 个鼻窦),随机分为两组。对于组 I 的鼻窦,使用了梯形皮瓣,而对于组 II 的鼻窦,则使用了无需前释放的改良三角形皮瓣。术后疼痛通过 100mm VAS 评分进行评分,范围从 0(无痛)到 100(可想象的最痛),并在术后 2、4、6 和 14 天记录。肿胀通过语言评定量表(VRS)记录,并分为四个等级:1 分表示无肿胀,手术区域口腔内肿胀患者得 2 分,手术区域任何额外肿胀患者得 3 分,口腔外肿胀剧烈且延伸至手术区域以外患者得 4 分。在鼻窦增大之前和之后、术后 2、4、6 和 14 天记录面部温度,以检查愈合过程。 :在组 I 中,术后 2 天记录疼痛强度,平均得分为 38.67 ± 6.4mm。肿胀在第 2 天和第 4 天更大,第 6 天消失。手术前后的面部温差为 4.737 °C ± 0.37。在组 II 中,疼痛评分低于组 I(<0.05)。肿胀评分在第 1 天和第 2 天为 2,第 4 天减少。第 2 天之后,与手术当天相比,温差显著降低(0.77 °C);第 2 天和第 4 天没有差异。 :本临床研究的结果表明,改良三角形皮瓣在鼻窦提升术中显著有效,可减少疼痛和肿胀。