Respiratory Rehabilitation and Respiratory Division, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.
Thorax. 2018 Oct;73(10):942-950. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211417. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
This study aimed to investigate whether adjunctive inspiratory muscle training (IMT) can enhance the well-established benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in patients with COPD.
219 patients with COPD (FEV: 42%±16% predicted) with inspiratory muscle weakness (PImax: 51±15 cm HO) were randomised into an intervention group (IMT+PR; n=110) or a control group (Sham-IMT+PR; n=109) in this double-blind, multicentre randomised controlled trial between February 2012 and October 2016 (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01397396). Improvement in 6 min walking distance (6MWD) was a priori defined as the primary outcome. Prespecified secondary outcomes included respiratory muscle function and endurance cycling time.
No significant differences between the intervention group (n=89) and the control group (n=85) in improvements in 6MWD were observed (0.3 m, 95% CI -13 to 14, p=0.967). Patients who completed assessments in the intervention group achieved larger gains in inspiratory muscle strength (effect size: 1.07, p<0.001) and endurance (effect size: 0.79, p<0.001) than patients in the control group. 75 s additional improvement in endurance cycling time (95% CI 1 to 149, p=0.048) and significant reductions in Borg dyspnoea score at isotime during the cycling test (95% CI -1.5 to -0.01, p=0.049) were observed in the intervention group.
Improvements in respiratory muscle function after adjunctive IMT did not translate into additional improvements in 6MWD (primary outcome). Additional gains in endurance time and reductions in symptoms of dyspnoea were observed during an endurance cycling test (secondary outcome) TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01397396; Results.
本研究旨在探讨辅助吸气肌训练(IMT)是否可以增强 COPD 患者中已确立的肺康复(PR)益处。
219 名 FEV:42%±16%预计值,吸气肌力量弱(PImax:51±15cmHO)的 COPD 患者,在这项双盲、多中心随机对照试验中被随机分为干预组(IMT+PR;n=110)或对照组(假 IMT+PR;n=109),于 2012 年 2 月至 2016 年 10 月期间进行(ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01397396)。6 分钟步行距离(6MWD)的改善被预先定义为主要结局。预设的次要结局包括呼吸肌功能和耐力踏车时间。
干预组(n=89)和对照组(n=85)在 6MWD 改善方面无显著差异(0.3m,95%CI-13 至 14,p=0.967)。完成干预组评估的患者在吸气肌力量(效应量:1.07,p<0.001)和耐力(效应量:0.79,p<0.001)方面的获益大于对照组。在耐力踏车测试中,干预组的耐力时间延长了 75s(95%CI1 至 149,p=0.048),在踏车测试中等时的 Borg 呼吸困难评分显著降低(95%CI-1.5 至-0.01,p=0.049)。
辅助 IMT 后呼吸肌功能的改善并未转化为 6MWD 的额外改善(主要结局)。在耐力踏车测试中观察到耐力时间的额外增加和呼吸困难症状的减少(次要结局)。
NCT01397396;结果。