Suppr超能文献

突破性听力技术与轻度感音神经性听力损失I:可及性与可负担性问题

Disruptive Hearing Technologies and Mild Sensorineural Hearing Loss I: Accessibility and Affordability Issues.

作者信息

Jilla Anna Marie, Johnson Carole E, Danhauer Jeffrey L

机构信息

Hearing Evaluation, Rehabilitation, and Outcomes (HERO) Laboratory, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, California.

出版信息

Semin Hear. 2018 May;39(2):135-145. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641740. Epub 2018 Jun 15.

Abstract

Limited accessibility to and affordability of hearing health care (HHC) and hearing aids (HAs) are two reasons why people do not seek treatment for their hearing losses. This article is the first in a series of two and discusses affordability issues (i.e., billing models, cost-effectiveness, insurance coverage, and reimbursement) related to and provides a historical context for the Over-the-Counter Hearing Aid Act of 2017. This piece of legislation supports development of a new class of over-the-counter HAs that represents a disruptive technology that may transform the HHC industry by reducing costs specific to the device. A discussion of ethical issues and the importance of using evidence-based practice guidelines set the stage for the second article in this series, which reviews relevant research on issues pertaining to persons with mild hearing loss.

摘要

听力保健(HHC)及助听器(HAs)获取途径有限且价格高昂,是人们听力损失后不寻求治疗的两个原因。本文是系列文章中的第一篇,共两篇,探讨了与2017年《非处方助听器法案》相关的可负担性问题(即计费模式、成本效益、保险覆盖范围和报销),并提供了该法案的历史背景。这项立法支持开发一类新型非处方助听器,这是一种颠覆性技术,可能通过降低设备特定成本来改变听力保健行业。对伦理问题的讨论以及使用循证实践指南的重要性为该系列的第二篇文章奠定了基础,第二篇文章将回顾与轻度听力损失患者相关问题的相关研究。

相似文献

4
Hearing aid affordability in the United States.美国助听器的可负担性
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Apr;18(3):246-252. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1822449. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
7
Pharmacist competencies for over-the-counter hearing aids: A Delphi study.非处方助听器药师的能力:德尔菲研究。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2021 Jul-Aug;61(4):e255-e262. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.01.039. Epub 2021 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical issues in direct-to-consumer healthcare: A scoping review.面向消费者的医疗保健中的伦理问题:一项范围综述。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Feb 13;3(2):e0000452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000452. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Toward the Future of Early Intervention for Adult Hearing Loss.迈向成人听力损失早期干预的未来。
Semin Hear. 2018 May;39(2):221-226. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641745. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
5
The Early Intervention of Hearing Loss in Adults.成人听力损失的早期干预
Semin Hear. 2018 May;39(2):115-122. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1642616. Epub 2018 Jun 15.

本文引用的文献

4
Self-Fitting Hearing Aids: Status Quo and Future Predictions.自适配助听器:现状与未来预测
Trends Hear. 2016 Apr 12;20:2331216516643284. doi: 10.1177/2331216516643284.
5
Policy Solutions for Better Hearing.改善听力的政策解决方案。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 9;315(6):553-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0044.
9
The socioeconomic impact of hearing loss in U.S. adults.美国成年人听力损失的社会经济影响。
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Mar;36(3):545-50. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000562.
10
Hearing loss and dementia - who is listening?听力损失与痴呆症——谁在关注?
Aging Ment Health. 2014;18(6):671-3. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2014.915924.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验