• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轻度感音神经性听力损失患者使用先进数字助听器的益处、满意度及自我效能感

Benefits from, Satisfaction with, and Self-Efficacy for Advanced Digital Hearing Aids in Users with Mild Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

作者信息

Johnson Carole E, Jilla Anna Marie, Danhauer Jeffrey L, Sullivan J Connor, Sanchez Kristin R

机构信息

Hearing Evaluation, Rehabilitation, and Outcomes (HERO) Laboratory, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 1200 N. Stonewall, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California.

出版信息

Semin Hear. 2018 May;39(2):158-171. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641742. Epub 2018 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1055/s-0038-1641742
PMID:29915453
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6003810/
Abstract

Little evidence is available regarding outcomes of advanced digital technology (ADT) hearing aid wearers with mild sensorineural hearing loss (MSNHL). The purpose of this article is to report the characteristics of and outcomes for this population. A cross-sectional research design was employed with 56 participants from a private practice setting. The International Outcomes Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA), Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL), and the Measure of Audiologic Rehabilitation Self-Efficacy for Hearing Aids (MARS-HA) were completed, scored, and compared with normative data. Results revealed that ADT aids were worn 10.5 hours/day, were mostly advanced to premium (55%), had an average cost per aid of $2,138 (SD = $840), and provided significant benefit (IOI-HA overall score: mean = 4.1; SD = 0.6) and satisfaction (SADL global score: mean = 5.4; SD = 0.8) to users who had good overall self-efficacy (MARS-HA composite score: mean = 81.7; SD = 12.8). Patients were most dissatisfied with and had the least self-efficacy for managing background noise and advanced handling of their devices. ADT hearing aid users with MSNHL achieved excellent outcomes, but ongoing follow-up and counseling from hearing health care providers may be important for successful management of background noise and mastery of advanced handling skills.

摘要

关于佩戴先进数字技术(ADT)助听器的轻度感音神经性听力损失(MSNHL)患者的预后,目前几乎没有相关证据。本文旨在报告该人群的特征和预后情况。采用横断面研究设计,选取了来自一家私人诊所的56名参与者。完成了《助听器国际预后量表》(IOI-HA)、《日常生活中对放大效果的满意度》(SADL)以及《助听器听力康复自我效能量表》(MARS-HA),并进行评分,然后与标准数据进行比较。结果显示,ADT助听器使用者每天佩戴10.5小时,大多数使用的是高级至顶级型号(55%),每台助听器的平均成本为2138美元(标准差=840美元),对总体自我效能良好的使用者(MARS-HA综合得分:平均值=81.7;标准差=12.8)有显著益处(IOI-HA总体得分:平均值=4.1;标准差=0.6)和满意度(SADL总体得分:平均值=5.4;标准差=0.8)。患者对背景噪声管理和设备高级操作的满意度最低,自我效能也最低。佩戴ADT助听器的MSNHL患者取得了良好的预后,但听力保健提供者持续的随访和咨询对于成功管理背景噪声和掌握高级操作技能可能很重要。

相似文献

1
Benefits from, Satisfaction with, and Self-Efficacy for Advanced Digital Hearing Aids in Users with Mild Sensorineural Hearing Loss.轻度感音神经性听力损失患者使用先进数字助听器的益处、满意度及自我效能感
Semin Hear. 2018 May;39(2):158-171. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641742. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
2
Predictors of Hearing Aid Use in the Advanced Digital Era: An Investigation of Benefit, Satisfaction, and Self-Efficacy.预测先进数字时代助听器使用的因素:利益、满意度和自我效能感的调查。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2020 Feb;31(2):87-95. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.18036. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
3
Hearing aid outcomes: effects of gender and experience on patients' use and satisfaction.助听器效果:性别和经验对患者使用情况及满意度的影响。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2009 Jul-Aug;20(7):422-32; quiz 459-60. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.20.7.4.
4
Effectiveness of a Web-Based SUpport PRogram (SUPR) for Hearing Aid Users Aged 50+: Two-Arm, Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的支持计划(SUPR)对 50 岁以上助听器使用者的有效性:双臂、群组随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 22;22(9):e17927. doi: 10.2196/17927.
5
Hearing aid fitting outcome: clinical application and psychometric properties of a Swedish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA).助听器验配结果:国际助听器结果量表(IOI-HA)瑞典语译本的临床应用及心理测量特性
J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Sep;21(8):512-21. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.8.3.
6
Hearing aid satisfaction and use in the advanced digital era.助听器在先进数字时代的满意度和使用情况。
Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):2029-36. doi: 10.1002/lary.23404. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
7
Hearing Aid Benefit in Patients with Mild Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review.轻度感音神经性听力损失患者的助听器益处:一项系统评价。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Apr;27(4):293-310. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.14076.
8
Evaluation of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids in a veteran sample.对退伍军人样本中助听器国际成效量表的评估。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2009 Jun;20(6):374-80. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.20.6.5.
9
International outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA): results from the Chinese version.国际助听器结局量表(IOI-HA)中文版测试结果。
Int J Audiol. 2011 Oct;50(10):673-8. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.588966.
10
Evaluation of satisfaction measures of analog and digital hearing aid users.模拟和数字助听器用户满意度测量的评估
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Sep-Oct;71(5):650-7. Epub 2006 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Translation of Chinese version of the measure of audiologic rehabilitation self-efficacy for hearing aids and the self-efficacy among hearing aid users in China: Application of the questionnaire.中文版助听器听觉康复自我效能感量表及中国助听器使用者自我效能感的翻译:问卷的应用
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 20;20(8):e0330163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330163. eCollection 2025.
2
Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Measure of Audiologic Rehabilitation Self-Efficacy for Hearing Aids (P-MARS-HA).助听器听力康复自我效能量表波斯语版(P-MARS-HA)的翻译、跨文化适应及心理测量学特性
Audiol Res. 2025 Mar 15;15(2):31. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15020031.
3
Intelligibility Sound Therapy Enhances the Ability of Speech-in-Noise Perception and Pre-Perceptual Neurophysiological Response.可懂度声音疗法增强噪声环境下言语感知能力和感知前神经生理反应。
Biology (Basel). 2024 Dec 6;13(12):1021. doi: 10.3390/biology13121021.
4
Determinants of Continuance Intention to Use Hearing Aids among Older Adults in Tehran (Iran).德黑兰(伊朗)老年人使用助听器持续意愿的决定因素
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Feb 17;12(4):487. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12040487.
5
Age-related hearing loss and its potential drug candidates: a systematic review.年龄相关性听力损失及其潜在的候选药物:一项系统综述。
Chin Med. 2023 Sep 20;18(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13020-023-00825-6.
6
Auditory Perceptual Exercises in Adults Adapting to the Use of Hearing Aids.成人适应使用助听器的听觉感知练习。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 18;13:832100. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.832100. eCollection 2022.
7
Neural Plasticity Induced by Hearing Aid Use.使用助听器诱导的神经可塑性。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 May 19;14:884917. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.884917. eCollection 2022.
8
Classification of Hearing Aids Into Feature Profiles Using Hierarchical Latent Class Analysis Applied to a Large Dataset of Hearing Aids.使用分层潜在类别分析将助听器分类为特征概况,应用于大型助听器数据集。
Ear Hear. 2020 Nov/Dec;41(6):1619-1634. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000410.
9
Toward the Future of Early Intervention for Adult Hearing Loss.迈向成人听力损失早期干预的未来。
Semin Hear. 2018 May;39(2):221-226. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641745. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
10
Disruptive Hearing Technologies and Mild Sensorineural Hearing Loss I: Accessibility and Affordability Issues.突破性听力技术与轻度感音神经性听力损失I:可及性与可负担性问题
Semin Hear. 2018 May;39(2):135-145. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641740. Epub 2018 Jun 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Hearing Aid Use and Mild Hearing Impairment: Learnings from Big Data.助听器使用与轻度听力障碍:大数据带来的启示
J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Sep;28(8):731-741. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16104.
2
Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life III: Localization.助听技术对日常生活结果的影响 III:定位。
Ear Hear. 2017 Nov/Dec;38(6):746-759. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000473.
3
The Effects of Service-Delivery Model and Purchase Price on Hearing-Aid Outcomes in Older Adults: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.服务提供模式和购买价格对老年人助听器使用效果的影响:一项随机双盲安慰剂对照临床试验
Am J Audiol. 2017 Mar 1;26(1):53-79. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJA-16-0111.
4
Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life II: Speech Understanding and Listening Effort.助听器技术对日常生活结局的影响II:言语理解与聆听努力
Ear Hear. 2016 Sep-Oct;37(5):529-40. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000327.
5
Prevalence of Hearing Loss by Severity in the United States.美国不同严重程度听力损失的患病率。
Am J Public Health. 2016 Oct;106(10):1820-2. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303299. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
6
Hearing Aid Benefit in Patients with Mild Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review.轻度感音神经性听力损失患者的助听器益处:一项系统评价。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Apr;27(4):293-310. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.14076.
7
Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life I: The Patients' Perspective.助听器技术对日常生活结果的影响I:患者视角
Ear Hear. 2016 Jul-Aug;37(4):e224-37. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000277.
8
Comments Regarding Rauterkus and Palmer (2014).关于劳特库斯和帕尔默(2014年)的评论
J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Sep;26(8):741-743. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15044.
9
Adults with mild hearing impairment: Are we meeting the challenge?轻度听力障碍的成年人:我们应对得了挑战吗?
Int J Audiol. 2015;54(11):786-95. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1046504. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
10
The hearing aid effect in 2013.2013年的助听器效果。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2014 Oct;25(9):893-903. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.25.9.10.