Suppr超能文献

胰岛素笔装置与一次性塑料注射器的比较——简易性、安全性、便利性及成本差异

A Comparison of Insulin Pen Devices and Disposable Plastic Syringes - Simplicity, Safety, Convenience and Cost Differences.

作者信息

Singh Ripudaman, Samuel Clarence, Jacob Jubbin J

机构信息

Endocrine and Diabetes Unit, Department of Medicine, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

Department of Community Health, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

出版信息

Eur Endocrinol. 2018 Apr;14(1):47-51. doi: 10.17925/EE.2018.14.1.47. Epub 2018 Apr 18.

Abstract

Managing diabetes efficiently demands a simple, safe, convenient and economical therapy. This study was done to understand the simplicity, safety, convenience and cost effectiveness of using pen versus syringe devices in patients on long-term insulin therapy. This prospective observational study was conducted at the endocrine outpatient department of a universityaffiliated teaching hospital in North India. The investigator interviewed patients using a self-made questionnaire after obtaining consent; patients were scored based on their answers. A high score represented a poor response. A total of 90 completed questionnaires (45 from each group) were obtained. Mean simplicity, safety and convenience score among the pen users was 5.31 ± 0.51, 5.4 ± 0.89 and 4.13 ± 1.04 respectively, as compared to 9.78 ± 1.43, 8.09 ± 2.02 and 8.67 ± 0.56 in syringe users respectively. The difference in these scores was statistically significant (p=0.0001). All patients felt that treatment using pen device was costlier when compared to using syringes, with pen users spending Rs1,756 per month on their insulin therapy, as compared to syringe users, who spent Rs590 per month. Among insulin pen users, 22.2% had optimal glycated haemoglobin levels (6-7.5%) as compared to 2.2% among syringe users, and this difference was statistically significant (p=0.007). An insulin pen is simple, safe and convenient to use, and may provide better glycaemic control. Treatment with a pen device is costlier, which may be due to the higher use of analogue insulin among pen users.

摘要

有效管理糖尿病需要一种简单、安全、方便且经济的治疗方法。本研究旨在了解长期接受胰岛素治疗的患者使用笔式装置与注射器装置的简易性、安全性、便利性和成本效益。这项前瞻性观察性研究在印度北部一所大学附属教学医院的内分泌门诊进行。在获得患者同意后,研究者使用自制问卷对患者进行访谈;根据患者的回答进行评分。高分代表反应不佳。共获得90份完整问卷(每组45份)。笔式装置使用者的简易性、安全性和便利性平均得分分别为5.31±0.51、5.4±0.89和4.13±1.04,而注射器使用者的相应得分分别为9.78±1.43、8.09±2.02和8.67±0.56。这些得分差异具有统计学意义(p=0.0001)。所有患者都认为与使用注射器相比,使用笔式装置治疗成本更高,笔式装置使用者每月胰岛素治疗花费1756卢比,而注射器使用者每月花费590卢比。在胰岛素笔使用者中,22.2%的患者糖化血红蛋白水平处于最佳范围(6 - 7.5%),而注射器使用者中这一比例为2.2%,这一差异具有统计学意义(p=0.007)。胰岛素笔使用简单、安全且方便,可能能更好地控制血糖。使用笔式装置治疗成本更高,这可能是由于笔式装置使用者中类似胰岛素的使用比例更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da70/5954595/341557453640/euendo-14-47-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验