• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

俯卧桥与6次重复最大负荷深蹲时核心肌肉激活情况的比较。

Comparison of Core Muscle Activation between a Prone Bridge and 6-RM Back Squats.

作者信息

van den Tillaar Roland, Saeterbakken Atle Hole

机构信息

Department of Sports Science and Physical Education, Nord University, Levanger, Norway.

Department of Teacher Education and Sports, Western Norwy University of Applied Sciences, Sogndal, Norway.

出版信息

J Hum Kinet. 2018 Jun 13;62:43-53. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0176. eCollection 2018 Jun.

DOI:10.1515/hukin-2017-0176
PMID:29922376
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6006542/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare core muscle activation during a prone bridge (plank) until failure and 6-RM back squats. Twelve resistance-trained males (age 23.5 ± 2.6 years, body mass 87.8 ± 21.3 kg, body height 1.81 ± 0.08 m) participated in this study. Total exercise time and EMG activity of the rectus abdominis, external abdominal oblique and erector spinae were measured during 6-RM back squats and a prone bridge with a weight of 20% of participants' body mass on their lower back. The main findings showed non-significant differences between the exercises in the rectus abdominis or external oblique, but greater erector spinae activation in squatting. Furthermore, in contrast to the prone bridge, the erector spinae and rectus abdominis demonstrated increasing muscle activation throughout the repetitions while squatting, whereas the prone bride demonstrated increasing external oblique activation between the beginning and the middle of the set. It was concluded that since squatting resulted in greater erector spine activation, but similar rectus abdominis and oblique external activation as the prone bridge, high-intensity squats rather than isometric low intensity core exercises for athletes would be recommended.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较俯卧桥(平板支撑)直至力竭和6次重复最大重量的深蹲过程中核心肌肉的激活情况。12名经过抗阻训练的男性(年龄23.5±2.6岁,体重87.8±21.3千克,身高1.81±0.08米)参与了本研究。在6次重复最大重量的深蹲以及在参与者下背部负重其体重20%的俯卧桥过程中,测量了总运动时间以及腹直肌、腹外斜肌和竖脊肌的肌电图活动。主要研究结果表明,在腹直肌或腹外斜肌方面,两种运动之间无显著差异,但深蹲时竖脊肌的激活程度更高。此外,与俯卧桥不同,深蹲时竖脊肌和腹直肌在整个重复过程中肌肉激活程度不断增加,而俯卧桥在组间开始和中间阶段腹外斜肌的激活程度增加。研究得出结论,由于深蹲导致竖脊肌的激活程度更高,但腹直肌和腹外斜肌的激活程度与俯卧桥相似,因此建议运动员进行高强度深蹲而非等长低强度核心训练。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb41/6006542/675934d4db32/hukin-62-043-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb41/6006542/283e457ebf63/hukin-62-043-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb41/6006542/d64e85b3f35e/hukin-62-043-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb41/6006542/675934d4db32/hukin-62-043-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb41/6006542/283e457ebf63/hukin-62-043-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb41/6006542/d64e85b3f35e/hukin-62-043-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb41/6006542/675934d4db32/hukin-62-043-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Core Muscle Activation between a Prone Bridge and 6-RM Back Squats.俯卧桥与6次重复最大负荷深蹲时核心肌肉激活情况的比较。
J Hum Kinet. 2018 Jun 13;62:43-53. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0176. eCollection 2018 Jun.
2
Muscle Activation Among Supine, Prone, and Side Position Exercises With and Without a Swiss Ball.使用和不使用瑞士球的仰卧、俯卧和侧卧姿势练习中的肌肉激活情况。
Sports Health. 2016 Jul;8(4):372-9. doi: 10.1177/1941738116653931. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
3
Change in trunk muscle activities with prone bridge exercise in patients with chronic low back pain.慢性下腰痛患者进行俯卧桥运动时躯干肌肉活动的变化
J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Jan;28(1):264-8. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.264. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
4
Electromyographic Effect of Using Different Attentional Foci During the Front Plank Exercise.使用不同注意力焦点进行前平板支撑练习的肌电图效果。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jan;98(1):26-29. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001008.
5
Progression of Core Stability Exercises Based on the Extent of Muscle Activity.基于肌肉活动程度的核心稳定性训练进展
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Oct;96(10):694-699. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000713.
6
Activity of Trunk and Lower Extremity Musculature: Comparison Between Parallel Back Squats and Belt Squats.躯干与下肢肌肉活动:平行背蹲与腰带深蹲的比较
J Hum Kinet. 2020 Mar 31;72:223-228. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2019-0126. eCollection 2020 Mar.
7
Effect of modified bridge exercise on trunk muscle activity in healthy adults: a cross sectional study.改良桥式运动对健康成年人躯干肌肉活动的影响:一项横断面研究。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2018 Mar-Apr;22(2):161-167. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
8
Effects of replacing free weights with elastic band resistance in squats on trunk muscle activation.深蹲时用弹力带阻力替代自由重量对躯干肌肉激活的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Nov;28(11):3056-62. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000516.
9
Influence of Scapular Position on the Core Musculature Activation in the Prone Plank Exercise.俯卧平板支撑运动中肩胛骨位置对核心肌群激活的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Aug;31(8):2255-2262. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001689.
10
Core muscle activation during Swiss ball and traditional abdominal exercises.瑞士球和传统腹部练习中的核心肌肉激活。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 May;40(5):265-76. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3073.

引用本文的文献

1
A Critical Review of Trunk and Hip Exercise Prescription: Applying Evidence for a Modern Approach.躯干与髋部运动处方的批判性综述:为现代方法应用证据
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2025 Mar 1;20(3):448-475. doi: 10.26603/001c.129972. eCollection 2025.
2
Relationship Between the Results of the Landing Error Scoring System and Trunk Muscle Thickness.着陆误差评分系统结果与躯干肌肉厚度之间的关系
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2024 Sep 1;19(9):1080-1087. doi: 10.26603/001c.122639. eCollection 2024.
3
The Quantification of Muscle Activation During the Loaded Carry Movement Pattern.

本文引用的文献

1
Muscle Activation and Performance During Trunk Strength Testing in High-Level Female and Male Football Players.高水平男女足球运动员躯干力量测试中的肌肉激活与表现
J Appl Biomech. 2016 Jun;32(3):241-7. doi: 10.1123/jab.2014-0303. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
2
Effects of Strength Training Using Unstable Surfaces on Strength, Power and Balance Performance Across the Lifespan: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.使用不稳定表面进行力量训练对全生命周期力量、功率和平衡表现的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Sports Med. 2015 Dec;45(12):1645-69. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0384-x.
3
Comparison of Kinematics and Muscle Activation in Free-Weight Back Squat With and Without Elastic Bands.
负重搬运运动模式中肌肉激活的量化
Int J Exerc Sci. 2024 Apr 1;17(1):480-490. doi: 10.70252/NWUE9985. eCollection 2024.
4
The Significance of Maximal Squat Strength for Neuromuscular Knee Control in Elite Handball Players: A Cross-Sectional Study.最大深蹲力量对精英手球运动员神经肌肉膝关节控制的意义:一项横断面研究。
Sports (Basel). 2023 Nov 27;11(12):236. doi: 10.3390/sports11120236.
5
Compensatory muscle activation and spinal curve changes in response to fatigue among adolescent male athletes.青春期男性运动员疲劳状态下的代偿性肌肉激活及脊柱曲线变化
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023 Apr 13;15(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13102-023-00668-6.
6
Core Muscle Activation With Foam Rolling and Static Planks.使用泡沫轴滚动和静态平板支撑激活核心肌肉
Front Physiol. 2022 Mar 8;13:852094. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.852094. eCollection 2022.
7
Core Muscle Activity During Physical Fitness Exercises: A Systematic Review.核心肌肉活动在体能锻炼中的作用:系统综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 16;17(12):4306. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124306.
8
The effects of performing integrated compared to isolated core exercises.进行综合核心练习与孤立核心练习的效果比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 27;14(2):e0212216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212216. eCollection 2019.
自由重量深蹲时使用和不使用弹力带的运动学和肌肉激活情况比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Apr;30(4):945-52. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001178.
4
The existence of a sticking region in free weight squats.自由重量深蹲中存在一个停滞区域。
J Hum Kinet. 2014 Oct 10;42:63-71. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0061. eCollection 2014 Sep 29.
5
An electromyographic comparison of a modified version of the plank with a long lever and posterior tilt versus the traditional plank exercise.一项关于长杠杆后倾改良版平板支撑与传统平板支撑运动的肌电图比较。
Sports Biomech. 2014 Sep;13(3):296-306. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2014.942355. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
6
Electromyographical comparison of plank variations performed with and without instability devices.使用和不使用不稳定装置进行平板支撑变体动作时的肌电图比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Nov;28(11):3298-305. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000521.
7
Effects of exercise with and without different degrees of blood flow restriction on torque and muscle activation.不同程度血流限制下运动对扭矩和肌肉激活的影响。
Muscle Nerve. 2015 May;51(5):713-21. doi: 10.1002/mus.24448.
8
Effect of Fatigue Upon Performance and Electromyographic Activity in 6-RM Bench Press.6 次重复最大负荷卧推中疲劳对运动表现和肌电图活动的影响。
J Hum Kinet. 2014 Apr 9;40:57-65. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0007. eCollection 2014 Mar 27.
9
Electromyographic comparison of traditional and suspension push-ups.传统俯卧撑与悬垂俯卧撑的肌电图比较。
J Hum Kinet. 2013 Dec 31;39:75-83. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2013-0070. eCollection 2013 Dec 18.
10
Effect of different rest intervals on the exercise volume completed during squat bouts.不同休息间歇对深蹲运动中完成的运动总量的影响。
J Sports Sci Med. 2005 Dec 1;4(4):361-6. eCollection 2005 Dec.