University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville FL.
The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Apr 21;9(8):e015865. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.015865. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
Background Vorapaxar as an adjunct to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) reduces thrombotic events in patients with prior myocardial infarction at the expense of increased bleeding. Withdrawal of aspirin has emerged as a bleeding reduction strategy. The pharmacodynamic effects of vorapaxar with potent P2Y inhibitors as well as the impact of dropping aspirin is unexplored and represented the aim of the VORA-PRATIC (Vorapaxar Therapy in Patients With Prior Myocardial Infarction Treated With Newer Generation P2Y Receptor Inhibitors Prasugrel and Ticagrelor) study. Methods and Results Post-myocardial infarction patients (n=130) on standard DAPT (aspirin+prasugrel or ticagrelor) were randomized to 1 of 3 arms: (1) triple therapy: aspirin+prasugrel/ticagrelor+vorapaxar; (2) dual therapy (drop aspirin): prasugrel/ticagrelor+vorapaxar; (3) DAPT: aspirin+prasugrel/ticagrelor. Pharmacodynamic assessments were performed at 3 time points (baseline and 7 and 30 days). Vorapaxar reduced CAT (collagen-ADP-TRAP)-induced platelet aggregation, a marker of platelet-mediated global thrombogenicity (triple therapy versus DAPT at 30 days: mean difference=-27; 95% CI,-35 to -19; <0.001; primary end point). This effect was attenuated but still significant in the absence of aspirin (dual therapy versus DAPT at 30 days: mean difference=-15; 95% CI,-23 to -7; <0.001; between-group comparisons, <0.05). Vorapaxar abolished TRAP-induced aggregation (<0.001), without affecting thrombin generation and clot strength. There were no differences in markers of P2Y reactivity. Markers sensitive to aspirin-induced effects increased (<0.001) in the dual-therapy arm. Conclusions In post-myocardial infarction patients treated with potent P2Y inhibitors, vorapaxar reduces platelet-driven global thrombogenicity, an effect that persisted, albeit attenuated, in the absence of aspirin and without affecting markers of P2Y reactivity or clot kinetics. The clinical implications of these PD observations warrant future investigation. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02545933.
Vorapaxar 联合双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)可降低既往心肌梗死患者的血栓事件风险,但会增加出血风险。停用阿司匹林已成为一种减少出血的策略。强效 P2Y 抑制剂联合 Vorapaxar 的药效学作用以及停用阿司匹林的影响尚不清楚,这也是 VORA-PRATIC(Vorapaxar 在接受新型 P2Y 受体抑制剂普拉格雷和替格瑞洛治疗的既往心肌梗死患者中的治疗作用)研究的目的。
接受标准 DAPT(阿司匹林+普拉格雷或替格瑞洛)的心肌梗死患者(n=130)随机分为 3 组:(1)三联治疗:阿司匹林+普拉格雷/替格瑞洛+Vorapaxar;(2)双抗治疗(停用阿司匹林):普拉格雷/替格瑞洛+Vorapaxar;(3)DAPT:阿司匹林+普拉格雷/替格瑞洛。在 3 个时间点(基线和 7 天和 30 天)进行药效学评估。Vorapaxar 降低了胶原-ADP-TRAP 诱导的血小板聚集,这是血小板介导的全身性血栓形成的标志物(三联治疗与 30 天 DAPT 相比:平均差值=-27;95%CI,-35 至-19;<0.001;主要终点)。在没有阿司匹林的情况下,这种作用减弱但仍然显著(双抗治疗与 30 天 DAPT 相比:平均差值=-15;95%CI,-23 至-7;<0.001;组间比较,<0.05)。Vorapaxar 消除了 TRAP 诱导的聚集(<0.001),而不影响凝血酶生成和凝块强度。P2Y 反应性标志物无差异。双抗治疗组中对阿司匹林诱导作用敏感的标志物增加(<0.001)。
在接受强效 P2Y 抑制剂治疗的心肌梗死患者中,Vorapaxar 降低了血小板驱动的全身性血栓形成,这种作用在没有阿司匹林的情况下仍然存在,尽管作用减弱,但不影响 P2Y 反应性或凝块动力学的标志物。这些药效学观察的临床意义值得进一步研究。