Scott Patricia J, McKinney Kelsey G, Perron Jeff M, Ruff Emily G, Smiley Jessica L
1 Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA.
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2019 Jan;39(1):56-63. doi: 10.1177/1539449218780618. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
The Role Checklist is used by occupational therapists across the globe. Developed in 1981 and consistent with the Model of Human Occupation (MOHO), until recently, the Role Checklist was not updated. This is of concern as the Role Checklist originally was established to measure role performance. In 2008, Kielhofner, in the fourth edition of A Model of Human Occupation, differentiated occupational performance in 10 roles which clearly fall into occupational participation in the Role Checklist Version 3. The objective of the study was to describe changes and establish utility, feasibility, and reliability of the Role Checklist Version 3. The Role Checklist Version 3 was administered electronically to N = 114 occupational therapists and students. A short time span was used due to sensitivity to history bias. Test-retest reliability using Cohen's Kappa and Cronbach's alpha mirrored analysis done on the original version. Qualitatively, nine themes emerged regarding utility and feasibility. Test-retest reliability is acceptable to excellent for present role incumbency (κ = 0.74-1.00), desired future role engagement (κ = 0.44-1.00), and satisfaction with performance (α = 0.77-0.98). Participants (91%) found it useful for treatment planning and 75% would recommend Version 3 over the original Role Checklist. Data support the Role Checklist Version 3 as a reliable, electronic instrument feasible for occupational therapists to measure participation.
角色清单被全球的职业治疗师所使用。它于1981年开发,与人类作业模式(MOHO)一致,直到最近才进行更新。这令人担忧,因为角色清单最初是为了衡量角色表现而设立的。2008年,基尔霍夫纳在《人类作业模式》第四版中,区分了10种角色中的职业表现,这些角色在角色清单第3版中显然属于职业参与范畴。本研究的目的是描述角色清单第3版的变化,并确定其效用、可行性和可靠性。角色清单第3版以电子方式发放给了N = 114名职业治疗师和学生。由于对历史偏差敏感,所以采用了较短的时间跨度。使用科恩kappa系数和克朗巴哈系数进行的重测信度反映了对原始版本所做的分析。在效用和可行性方面,定性地出现了九个主题。对于当前角色履行情况(κ = 0.74 - 1.00)、期望的未来角色参与度(κ = 0.44 - 1.00)以及对表现的满意度(α = 0.77 - 0.98),重测信度从可接受至优秀。参与者(91%)发现它对治疗计划有用,75%的人会推荐第3版而非原始的角色清单。数据支持角色清单第3版作为一种可靠的电子工具,可供职业治疗师用于测量参与情况。