Kim Chul-Hyun, Hwang Jong Moon, Park Jin-Sung, Han Seungwoo, Park Donghwi
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, South Korea.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(25):e11098. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011098.
The aim of this study is to investigate the usefulness of flexion-extension (dynamic) radiographs in evaluating the severity of disc degeneration and disc protrusion in cervical magnetic resonance image (MRI). Patients complaining of neck or arm pain with no prior surgical history and who had undergone both cervical MRI and dynamic radiographs were included in this study. The following patients were excluded: those who had any history of trauma, autoimmune disease such as rheumatoid arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis, prior cervical fracture or prior cervical spine surgery. Based on these criteria, 161 patients who visited our department for neck pain or upper extremity radicular symptoms were initially included retrospectively. Among them, 69 patients were excluded due to the lack of cervical MRI or dynamic radiographs. Therefore, a total of 92 patients were included for analysis in this study. The maximal diameter of disc protrusion in sagittal or axial MRI, the severity of cervical disc degeneration, and segmental horizontal displacement in dynamic cervical radiographs are the main outcome measurements. In the results of this study, the extension radiograph of C5/6 had the highest sensitivity (93.33%) and specificity (100%) in predicting cervical disc protrusion followed by C4/5 (sensitivity; 77.28%, specificity 92.86%) among the dynamic radiographs. Segmental horizontal displacement at the C3/4, C4/5, and C5/6 level in the neutral and extension radiographs had a significant correlation with the severity of cervical disc degeneration in MRI (P < .05). At the C6/7 level, however, only extension radiograph had a significant correlation with the severity of cervical disc degeneration in the MRI (P < .05). In conclusion, if MRI is not available in a primary clinical setting, dynamic cervical radiographs may be useful in predicting the severity of degenerative disc and disc protrusion in cervical MRI. Among the dynamic cervical radiographs, the extension radiograph was the most sensitive for predicting the severity of cervical disc degeneration and disc protrusion, especially at the C3/4, C4/5, C5/6, and C6/7 levels in MRI.
本研究的目的是探讨屈伸(动态)X线片在评估颈椎磁共振成像(MRI)中椎间盘退变和椎间盘突出严重程度方面的实用性。本研究纳入了主诉颈部或手臂疼痛、无既往手术史且已接受颈椎MRI和动态X线片检查的患者。排除以下患者:有任何创伤史、自身免疫性疾病(如类风湿性关节炎或强直性脊柱炎)、既往颈椎骨折或既往颈椎手术史的患者。根据这些标准,最初回顾性纳入了161名因颈部疼痛或上肢神经根症状前来我院就诊的患者。其中,69名患者因缺乏颈椎MRI或动态X线片而被排除。因此,本研究共纳入92名患者进行分析。矢状面或轴位MRI中椎间盘突出的最大直径、颈椎间盘退变的严重程度以及动态颈椎X线片中节段水平位移是主要观察指标。在本研究结果中,在动态X线片中,C5/6的伸展位X线片在预测颈椎间盘突出方面具有最高的敏感性(93.33%)和特异性(100%),其次是C4/5(敏感性;77.28%,特异性92.86%)。中立位和伸展位X线片中C3/4、C4/5和C5/6水平的节段水平位移与MRI中颈椎间盘退变的严重程度具有显著相关性(P<0.05)。然而,在C6/7水平,只有伸展位X线片与MRI中颈椎间盘退变的严重程度具有显著相关性(P<0.05)。总之,如果在初级临床环境中无法进行MRI检查,动态颈椎X线片可能有助于预测颈椎MRI中椎间盘退变和椎间盘突出的严重程度。在动态颈椎X线片中,伸展位X线片在预测颈椎间盘退变和椎间盘突出的严重程度方面最为敏感,尤其是在MRI的C3/4、C4/5、C5/6和C6/7水平。