• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在墨西哥法律边缘实现堕胎权。

Realizing Abortion Rights at the Margins of Legality in Mexico.

机构信息

a Department of Anthropology , University of Oklahoma , Norman , Oklahoma , USA.

出版信息

Med Anthropol. 2019 Feb-Mar;38(2):167-181. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2018.1474213. Epub 2018 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1080/01459740.2018.1474213
PMID:29924658
Abstract

I analyze the alternative tactics and logics of Las Fuertes, a feminist organization that has taken an "alegal" approach to realizing the human right to abortion in the conservative Mexican state of Guanajuato. Since a series of United Nations agreements throughout the 1990s enshrined reproductive rights as universal human rights, Mexican feminists have adopted the human rights platform as a lobbying tool to pressure the government to reform restrictive abortion laws. This strategy bore fruit in Mexico City, with passage of the historic 2007 abortion legalization. Las Fuertes has leveraged the human rights strategy differently - to justify the direct provision of local abortion accompaniment in a context of near-total abortion criminalization. By directly seizing abortion rights, rather than seeking to implement them through legalistic channels, Las Fuertes has effectively challenged Mexican reproductive governance in an adversarial political environment.

摘要

我分析了 Las Fuertes 的替代策略和逻辑,Las Fuertes 是一个女权组织,在墨西哥保守的瓜纳华托州采取了“非法”手段来实现堕胎的人权。自上世纪 90 年代一系列联合国协议将生殖权利奉为普遍人权以来,墨西哥女权主义者已将人权平台作为游说工具,向政府施压,要求其改革限制堕胎的法律。这一策略在墨西哥城取得了成果,通过了具有历史意义的 2007 年堕胎合法化。Las Fuertes 以不同的方式利用了人权策略——在几乎完全将堕胎定罪的背景下,为直接提供当地堕胎陪伴辩护。Las Fuertes 通过直接夺取堕胎权,而不是试图通过法律渠道来实施这些权利,在敌对的政治环境中有效地挑战了墨西哥的生殖治理。

相似文献

1
Realizing Abortion Rights at the Margins of Legality in Mexico.在墨西哥法律边缘实现堕胎权。
Med Anthropol. 2019 Feb-Mar;38(2):167-181. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2018.1474213. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
2
Luisa's Ghosts: Haunted Legality and Collective Expressions of Pain.路易莎的幽灵:萦绕不去的合法性与集体表达的痛苦。
Med Anthropol. 2018 Nov-Dec;37(8):688-702. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2018.1458308. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
3
Lawful Sinners: Reproductive Governance and Moral Agency Around Abortion in Mexico.《合法的罪人:墨西哥堕胎治理中的生殖治理与道德代理》
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2018 Mar;42(1):11-31. doi: 10.1007/s11013-017-9550-y.
4
Metrics of Survival: Post-Abortion Care and Reproductive Rights in Senegal.生存指标:塞内加尔的流产后护理和生殖权利。
Med Anthropol. 2019 Feb-Mar;38(2):152-166. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2018.1496333. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
5
Twelve years after abortion decriminalization in Mexico City: Can we still remain an island of liberties?墨西哥城堕胎非刑罪化 12 年后:我们还能继续保持自由的孤岛吗?
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jan;62:63-78. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
6
From Reproductive Rights to Responsibilization: Fashioning Liberal Subjects in Mexico City's New Public Sector Abortion Program.从生殖权利到责任化:塑造墨西哥城新公共部门堕胎项目中的自由主体
Med Anthropol Q. 2017 Dec;31(4):445-463. doi: 10.1111/maq.12321. Epub 2017 May 21.
7
Women's right to health and Ireland's abortion laws.妇女的健康权与爱尔兰的堕胎法律。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Jul;130(1):93-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.020. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
8
The need for balancing the reproductive rights of women and the unborn in the Mexican courtroom.在墨西哥法庭上平衡女性生育权利与未出生胎儿权益的必要性。
Med Law Rev. 2010 Autumn;18(3):427-33. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwq018.
9
Reproductive Governance and the (Re)definition of Human Rights in Poland.生殖治理与波兰人权的(再)定义。
Med Anthropol. 2019 Feb-Mar;38(2):182-194. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2018.1472090. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
10
Abortion exile: navigating Mexico's fractured abortion landscape.堕胎流亡:在墨西哥支离破碎的堕胎环境中艰难前行。
Cult Health Sex. 2020 Aug;22(8):855-870. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2019.1631963. Epub 2019 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The chemical geographies of misoprostol: Spatializing abortion access from the biochemical to the global.米索前列醇的化学地理学:将堕胎可及性从生化层面到全球范围进行空间化呈现。
Ann Am Assoc Geogr. 2024 Jan 2;114(1):123-138. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2023.2242453. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
2
Building infrastructures of abortion care in an un-caring state: acompañante's carework and abortion access in Peru.在一个冷漠的国家构建堕胎护理基础设施:秘鲁陪伴者的护理工作与堕胎途径
Signs (Chic). 2023 Spring;48(3):585-608. doi: 10.1086/723296.
3
Viapolitics and the emancipatory possibilities of abortion mobilities.
通过政治与堕胎流动的解放可能性。
Mobilities. 2020;15(6):896-910. doi: 10.1080/17450101.2020.1803588. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
4
Necessary but not sufficient: a scoping review of legal accountability for sexual and reproductive health in low-income and middle-income countries.必要但不充分:对低收入和中等收入国家性健康和生殖健康法律问责制的范围界定审查。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jul;6(7). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006033.
5
Self-managed abortion: a constellation of actors, a cacophony of laws?自我管理的堕胎:一系列行为主体,杂乱的法律?
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021 Dec;29(1):1899764. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2021.1899764.
6
Studying Accompaniment model Feasibility and Effectiveness (SAFE) Study: study protocol for a prospective observational cohort study of the effectiveness of self-managed medication abortion.研究伴随模型可行性和有效性(SAFE)研究:一项前瞻性观察队列研究,研究自我管理药物流产有效性的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 19;10(11):e036800. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036800.
7
Autonomous Health Movements: Criminalization, De-Medicalization, and Community-Based Direct Action.自主健康运动:刑事定罪、非医学化与基于社区的直接行动
Health Hum Rights. 2020 Dec;22(2):85-97.