Suppr超能文献

直肠癌中CpG岛甲基化表型预后价值的Meta分析

Meta-analysis of the prognostic value of CpG island methylator phenotype in rectal cancer.

作者信息

Kokelaar R F, Jones H, Beynon J, Evans M E, Harris D A

机构信息

ABMU Singleton Hospital, Sketty Lane, Swansea, Wales, SA2 8QA, UK.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Aug;33(8):995-1000. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3108-5. Epub 2018 Jun 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The pathological and prognostic importance of CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in rectal cancer, as a sub-population of colorectal cancer, is unknown. A meta-analysis was preformed to estimate the prognostic significance of CIMP in rectal cancer.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed of PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and Cochrane electronic databases for articles pertaining to CIMP and rectal cancer. Articles were analysed and data extracted according to PRISMA standards.

RESULTS

Six studies including 1529 patients were included in the analysis. Following dichotomisation, the prevalence of CIMP-positive tumours was 10 to 57%, with a median of 12.5%. Meta-analysis demonstrated the pooled odds ratio for all-cause death for CIMP-positive tumours vs CIMP-negative tumours was 1.24 (95% CI 0.88-1.74). Z test for overall effect was 1.21 (p = 0.23). Heterogeneity between the studies was low (X 5.96, df 5, p = 0.31, I = 16%). A total of 15 different loci were used for assessing CIMP across the studies, with a median of 6.5 loci (range 5-8).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant association between CIMP and poor outcomes in rectal cancer was demonstrated. There was a high degree of heterogeneity in CIMP assessment methodologies and in study populations. Rectal cancer datasets were frequently not extractable from larger colorectal cohorts, limiting analysis.

摘要

目的

作为结直肠癌的一个亚群,CpG岛甲基化表型(CIMP)在直肠癌中的病理及预后重要性尚不清楚。本研究进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估CIMP在直肠癌中的预后意义。

方法

对PubMed、Embase、MEDLINE、PubMed Central和Cochrane电子数据库进行系统检索,查找与CIMP和直肠癌相关的文章。根据PRISMA标准对文章进行分析并提取数据。

结果

分析纳入了6项研究,共1529例患者。二分法分析后,CIMP阳性肿瘤的发生率为10%至57%,中位数为12.5%。荟萃分析显示,CIMP阳性肿瘤与CIMP阴性肿瘤全因死亡的合并比值比为1.24(95%可信区间0.88 - 1.74)。总体效应的Z检验值为1.21(p = 0.23)。研究间的异质性较低(X² = 5.96,自由度 = 5,p = 0.31,I² = 16%)。各项研究共使用了15个不同的位点来评估CIMP,中位数为6.5个位点(范围5 - 8)。

结论

未证实CIMP与直肠癌不良预后之间存在显著关联。CIMP评估方法和研究人群存在高度异质性。直肠癌数据集常常无法从较大的结直肠癌队列中提取,限制了分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb8a/6060825/ca194dbabfb8/384_2018_3108_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验