Wang Michele S, Wang Shouwen
AKDHC Ambulatory Surgery Center, Arizona Kidney Disease and Hypertension Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
J Vasc Access. 2018 Jul;19(4):350-357. doi: 10.1177/1129729818757709. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
Substantial percentages of cephalic arteriovenous fistulas are situated too deep and require superficialization before use for hemodialysis. The superficialization techniques are diverse: tunnel transposition, elevation, elevation transposition, and lipectomy. Since the fistula veins are not mobilized during lipectomy, it is believed that lipectomy produces better outcomes than other techniques. However, no available report directly compares lipectomy with other techniques. The objective of this report is to compare the outcomes of cephalic elevation transposition with lipectomy.
The clinical data of patients who underwent second-stage cephalic elevation transposition or lipectomy at an ambulatory surgery center from 2009 to 2017 were analyzed ( n = 153).
Comparing the cephalic elevation transposition group ( n = 125) with the lipectomy group ( n = 28), the mean body mass index was 36.8 ± 7.6 versus 38.1 ± 7.2 ( p = 0.41); the percentage of upper arm fistulas was 84% versus 61% ( p < 0.01); the mean follow-up was 20.1 ± 17.5 versus 38.6 ± 24.4 months ( p < 0.01); the primary patency rates of the whole fistula conduits were 42% versus 50% at 1 year ( p = 0.08); the secondary patency rates were 99% versus 100% at 1 year ( p = 0.22); the primary patency rates of the superficialized vein segments were 73% versus 68% at 1 year ( p = 0.72); and the mean number of percutaneous interventions required for the superficialized vein segments was 0.49 ± 1.10 versus 0.43 ± 0.71 per access-year ( p = 0.74).
Cephalic elevation transposition and lipectomy are both reliable techniques for superficialization of cephalic fistula veins and their outcomes are comparable.
相当比例的头臂动静脉内瘘位置过深,在用于血液透析之前需要进行浅表化处理。浅表化技术多种多样:隧道移位、抬高、抬高移位和脂肪切除术。由于在脂肪切除术中内瘘静脉未被游离,人们认为脂肪切除术比其他技术能产生更好的效果。然而,尚无现有报告直接比较脂肪切除术与其他技术。本报告的目的是比较头臂抬高移位术与脂肪切除术的效果。
分析了2009年至2017年在一家门诊手术中心接受二期头臂抬高移位术或脂肪切除术的患者的临床资料(n = 153)。
将头臂抬高移位组(n = 125)与脂肪切除组(n = 28)进行比较,平均体重指数分别为36.8±7.6和38.1±7.2(p = 0.41);上臂内瘘的比例分别为84%和61%(p < 0.01);平均随访时间分别为20.1±17.5个月和38.6±24.4个月(p < 0.01);整个内瘘管道1年时的初级通畅率分别为42%和50%(p = 0.08);1年时的次级通畅率分别为99%和100%(p = 0.22);浅表化静脉段1年时的初级通畅率分别为73%和68%(p = 0.72);每个使用年浅表化静脉段所需的经皮干预平均次数分别为0.49±1.10和0.43±0.71(p = 0.74)。
头臂抬高移位术和脂肪切除术都是头臂内瘘静脉浅表化的可靠技术,它们的效果相当。